Looks like it was designed by Michael Bay.
You know, this all seems like Chevrolet is stuck in one of those "extreme" phases like Cadillac was in 2000 and children's cartoons were in the 1990s. Everything needs to be razor sharp and edgy and cool or else it's awful.
It almost seems like a parody.
Looks like it was designed by Michael Bay.
Zenith013This. It looks like GM's impact on Transformers is reciprocating.
You know, this all seems like Chevrolet is stuck in one of those "extreme" phases like Cadillac was in 2000 and children's cartoons were in the 1990s. Everything needs to be razor sharp and edgy and cool or else it's awful.
It almost seems like a parody.
New Viper will take their market and their clients.
How do you figure that?
You know, this all seems like Chevrolet is stuck in one of those "extreme" phases like Cadillac was in 2000 and children's cartoons were in the 1990s. Everything needs to be razor sharp and edgy and cool or else it's awful.
It almost seems like a parody.
RocZXThe C7 is set to debut Jan. 13th 2013 at Detroit Show Auto.
the C7 will also have a new logo...
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5OYmE7fVpk">YouTube Link</a>
And Chevy now has a website for the C7
http://www.chevrolet.com/one13thirteen.html
it will release video about the C7 every few weeks.
I went to that page and saw nothing but a statement about them changing. I doubt it. It's a Corvette - a low man's low-budget imitation of a real sports car. It'll just be a big-but-low-tech engine (heaps of displacement to get big power but only as much power as Ferrari would get from a third less engine) mounted onto an Amish buggy complete with medieval suspension (leaf springs, literally medieval since they date back centuries) and covered in a cheap plastic shell.
YSSMANIf I'm understanding things correctly, the dual-flags are supposed to be coming back on a wider variety of vehicles as a way to denote a performance variant of the vehicle. It's what they did back in the '50s and '60s at Chevrolet, and with the SS Sedan likely taking the wind out of the use of "SS" as a performance designation, it will likely be a bit more reasonable.
We'll see. Chevrolet's new design language is interesting, if a bit bland. They'll need to do something interesting to jazz it up.
ShobThaBobAnd in the states, a 1lt base Corvette starts at around 46k MSRP, which you can still talk down from no problem.
SlashfanJust read that the new Corvette will be so different that GM is shutting down several plants to retool, retrain, and renovate their body shops.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2012/1019/2014-Corvette-so-different-GM-will-shut-down-plant-to-retool
Retool is just "were now coming in to the 21st century so need to modernise our factory". To be honest, the C6 could of been sold as a kit car as it looked like a puzzle being put together.
Ooh, look. More informed sentiment.I went to that page and saw nothing but a statement about them changing. I doubt it. It's a Corvette - a low man's low-budget imitation of a real sports car. It'll just be a big-but-low-tech engine (heaps of displacement to get big power but only as much power as Ferrari would get from a third less engine) mounted onto an Amish buggy complete with medieval suspension (leaf springs, literally medieval since they date back centuries) and covered in a cheap plastic shell.
IceMan PJNI went to that page and saw nothing but a statement about them changing. I doubt it. It's a Corvette - a low man's low-budget imitation of a real sports car. It'll just be a big-but-low-tech engine (heaps of displacement to get big power but only as much power as Ferrari would get from a third less engine) mounted onto an Amish buggy complete with medieval suspension (leaf springs, literally medieval since they date back centuries) and covered in a cheap plastic shell.
We'll see....
Sold as a kit car. LOL Yes, right...
Yeh i agree that the LS will be historic but for everywhere but america, it works. after all, there up to LSx now right. but THE best engine i've seen is the LFAs V10 thats the size of a V8 and weight of a V6. Europe is stuck with turboing engines now due to european laws new M3 will be Tri-Turbo straight six from a powerful turbod V8The Corvette's LS engine will go down in history as one of the all time best engines ever. It is powerful, light, reliable, has great aftermarket support, and is capable of extensive modification. Power per displacement is also an absolutely meaningless measurement.
I won't even begin to respond to your plastic comment.
Yeh i agree that the LS will be historic but for everywhere but america, it works. after all, there up to LSx now right. but THE best engine i've seen is the LFAs V10 thats the size of a V8 and weight of a V6. Europe is stuck with turboing engines now due to european laws new M3 will be Tri-Turbo straight six from a powerful turbod V8
Being plastic is an advantage and a disadvantage. Light and cheap but in the end, old and flimsy. Time for CF.
Which would matter if the body of a Corvette was meant to provide any rigidity.Being plastic is an advantage and a disadvantage. Light and cheap but in the end, old and flimsy.
I went to that page and saw nothing but a statement about them changing. I doubt it. It's a Corvette - a low man's low-budget imitation of a real sports car. It'll just be a big-but-low-tech engine (heaps of displacement to get big power but only as much power as Ferrari would get from a third less engine) mounted onto an Amish buggy complete with medieval suspension (leaf springs, literally medieval since they date back centuries) and covered in a cheap plastic shell.
We'll see....
Edit:
On the GT Planet app on my phone and have no idea which page it started from with the aforementioned link, so.... Didn't realize this thread was forty-some pages until after I replied.
:-/
Edit 2:
Found it.
How about you get some knowledge about cars before posting.
Zenith013I wasn't saying that the LS is historic, and I didn't mean that the LS is a good engine for manufacturers to use.
One could probably think of more car models that have had an LS swap done to them than haven't.
(heaps of displacement to get big power but only as much power as Ferrari would get from a third less engine)
That's not a customer point of view. The average Corvette buyer isn't going to hold off until they can spend twice as much money to buy a car that would most likely suit their needs worse.I don't have it too. But from a customer point of view i would rather wait, gather some more money and Buy Viper instead of Corvette.
Yeah. Because an 800+ pound (probably much more if you built it up to have that much power), ungainly dimensioned iron block engine is totally better for the job.Being european, i'd rather import a japanese rather than a American so rb25/6DET tuned to over 1000hp any day.
No. The reason to go that way is because it's cheaper, more reliable, more powerful and does almost nothing to the handling balance compared to the engine that is already in there.Ive seen a few LS rx7s but reasoning for them to go that way is price, the expensive swaps go GTR engine or triple/quad rotor conversations.
Try to find a Ferrari that has 100K miles on it, without having a rebuild engine.
Edit. Maybe 100K is a bit high. Try 50K.
A better challenge is try finding a modern Ferrari with those mileages to begin with.