- 1,718
- Australia
I absolutely love the Group 1s at Sainte-Croix. It's such an interesting circuit. The wide range of strengths and weaknesses of the different car classes plus several sections where it's possible to take different lines results in some amazing, strategic and intense racing. It also helps that I seem to be way stronger on the combo than I should be.
So far I have run the McLaren, the 919 and the Tomahawk in-race. I have the most success in the Tomahawk, but the 919 is a close second. The hybrids will eat the Tomahawk alive out of slow turns but once the Dodge is up to speed, look out. it is also crazy good on tyres. I am doing 4s3m and could easily get 5 or 6 out of the softs BUT the mediums are honestly only barely slower.
The only other car I've seen in-race that intrigues me is the Mazda LM55. That thing is unbelievably strong in a straight line.
I'm baffled by the Audi VGT appearing at the top of the qualy boards. That thing is such a pig to drive. The 3rd gear understeer is just so ridiculous as to be irritating and they surely got the ratio number wrong on 6th? I have yet to see one in a race.
If you haven't tried this week's C yet, give it a go. It rocks!
So far I have run the McLaren, the 919 and the Tomahawk in-race. I have the most success in the Tomahawk, but the 919 is a close second. The hybrids will eat the Tomahawk alive out of slow turns but once the Dodge is up to speed, look out. it is also crazy good on tyres. I am doing 4s3m and could easily get 5 or 6 out of the softs BUT the mediums are honestly only barely slower.
The only other car I've seen in-race that intrigues me is the Mazda LM55. That thing is unbelievably strong in a straight line.
I'm baffled by the Audi VGT appearing at the top of the qualy boards. That thing is such a pig to drive. The 3rd gear understeer is just so ridiculous as to be irritating and they surely got the ratio number wrong on 6th? I have yet to see one in a race.
If you haven't tried this week's C yet, give it a go. It rocks!
Last edited: