- 687
- United Kingdom
- jamiemb17
I hope you don't feel pressured into responding quickly if it gets in the way of your work. But I'll respond now whilst it's on my mind. What you say is true, that often we don't really know what we want. I know that often when I hear what fellow players would do if they were developing a game that I play, or what transfers fans would make if they were managing my favourite footy team, it makes me appreciate that there is a reason we have dedicated professionals for these jobs. And I haven't personally been on GTS since the change to weeklies (on holiday atm), so I can't really say that I don't like the change, but I am pretty sure I will be having less fun when I get home than I was having before. 9.1% of voters agree with PD's decision, and this is coming after the update, so the majority of voters will have played the game and developed a true opinion before voting. So in this case, I'm not sure PD have got it right. I don't know if myself and the majority will come to grow on the change eventually, but I would have to see that happen to believe it. My main concern is that PD have had some ulterior motive in this change; or maybe they really just ****** it up. And again, I respect that you and a few others support the change to weeklies, but for now I don't see it being what "the community", if we imagine it as a single body, wants.Your post is way too deep (and really good) for me to analyze now (I'm in the end of a deadline for the Uni, today basically). But you have touched a critical point here, what is the greater good in the case of this game? There must be a reason why this game is sanctioned by the FIA. There must be an answer to why Assetto Corsa Competizione is going to be the official Blancpain GT game. I think gaming companies are starting to integrate profit and education in the same package. Another example in the game industry, but not related to motor sport, could be "Prince of Persia: The Assassin's Creed", which was scratched by UBISOFT and reconverted into its own franchise, a game series that has the potential to integrate action and history education like never before. I'm completely sure game studios are combining education more and more into their products, because this integration brings profit. In the case of PD, this education is oriented to Motorsport and racing. But this is just my personal opinion, and all my views are 100% biased.
I don't want to just play a video game (there are dozens out there to choose that are way more fun), I want competition. I want to race and I want to win. The simple thought of a full 40 laps race in a secure environment in a Gr.2 at Suzuka accelerates my heartbeat, just thinking about it.
Driving is for everyone, racing is not.
So, to me, any measure that PD takes to make the game more competitive is welcome. Even if that means giving the core base what they need not what they want. The majority is not always right. The majority wants a less punitive penalty system, which leads to carnage. The majority wants daily races, which leads to lack of skill and 'track awareness'. The majority wants more cars and more tracks instead of improvements in the features that already exist.
For instance, nobody asked for a more sim-like tyre model, infact we would know nothing about the new tyre model if not because @Tidgney hinted it after the Nürburgring event. Did we really need a new tyre model? The answer is yes, we didn't know it but yes. The new tyre model improves the FFB in most wheels and makes the game less arcade and more simulation-like. You can't put your foot down in a Gr.4 car immediately after a sharp corner without consequences, not anymore, it is more realistic. Funny enough, there is unanimity about how good is, but nobody asked for it.
Nobody asked for not-tuning competition. But it makes the car a simple medium to make the racer shine, and today makes the game very competitive. Nobody asked for this, it was an unilateral decision.
The majority is not asking about linear throttle, but we need it. It will make us better racers, in particular those that are new in sim-racing (the base core... the majority).
A democracy in a game like this would transform GT Sport into Need for Speed. Because the truth is the majority has no ****ing idea of what they want. Imagine if the majority wants to add grenade launchers to the cars to make the game interesting? Should we have them then?
I want to think that PD is really trying to educate in the sense of motorsport and competition. Again, I might be wrong, since this is a 100% biased opinion. If iRacing were as good looking and fun as GTSPort I wouldnt be here asking for competitiveness
Sorry, I really like your post, I will try to respond properly in other moment, I have an MMA for the Uni to deliver today. See you around.
Educating us about motorsports...I don't buy that as a reason for weekly races. FIA races are there for those who want to take this game seriously. They have already done a fine job of providing for both tryhards (or whatever non-derogatory term you want to use ) and casuals.
Anyway, I guess that was just about the specific issue of dailies/weeklies. If you do respond about anything else later than I'll happily read it too. Good luck with Uni!