- 7,153
- killermrk
- KillerMRK2
SUBMIT THIS TO AUTOBLOG. NOW.
Okay?
Yes - 1996.
M5PowerI'm surprised you need variety from Gallardos. I've seen 30 and my heart still skips a beat when I see one.
I thought so. The 190E 2.5 wasn't really an AMG, right?
If I was just focused on getting a parking space before sunset, I never would have seen this on the side street. Made a U-turn up ahead and parked right across from it. Not a single person who walked by didn't stop and look. I didn't get to hear it start up, having more important sunsets to catch, but it was completely mint, inside and out. A total spaceship among horse & buggies, even today. (And "Hi" to ML, who's probably watching me post this.)
(And "Hi" to ML, who's probably watching me post this.)
No, though I bet AMG had a hand in it. The first US-badged model was the C36.
M5PowerAre you totally sure that's real? Looks quite a bit shorter than a normal one. That said, my complete experience with on-road Countach sightings comes from one viewing once a year ago next week, and I've never seen a replica Countach in person.
I'm not sure at all. It had quite a lot of familiar cues, but it's been years since I've seen a Countach first hand. Looking at studio photos, it looks very close. If it's a kit, it's a top-notch job.
Nice R34 spot, Doug. That thing's gorgeous. 👍
Spotted this today:
I have a feeling it's really a Mirage in disguise...can anyone tell? Note its RHD-ness. Either way, it was pretty cool seeing it.
The top half is pretty convincing, but the sill extentions scream glassfibre rather than the aluminium that they probably should be. The position of the exhausts is also wrong - yet the style of them is spot on. The panel gap and placement around the doors and engine cover is also pretty appalling. My biggest issue with it is the rear wheels position within the wheel arches - they just don't fill them like they should.
On closer inspection of a genuine Countach...
...it becomes obvious that its a replica. Type 'countach replica' into Google images and you'll find dozens of similar kits.
The top half is pretty convincing, but the sill extentions scream glassfibre rather than the aluminium that they probably should be. The position of the exhausts is also wrong - yet the style of them is spot on. The panel gap and placement around the doors and engine cover is also pretty appalling. My biggest issue with it is the rear wheels position within the wheel arches - they just don't fill them like they should.
On closer inspection of a genuine Countach...
http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/703/lamborealey4.jpg
http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/961/lamborepzx5.jpg
...it becomes obvious that its a replica. Type 'countach replica' into Google images and you'll find dozens of similar kits.
That settles that, then. It was kind of unexpected in that particular town, too. Looking at the rear arches again, they don't have much of that Gandini kink, either. I was so taken aback by its presence that I didn't even look inside. I'm sure it was a bit more obvious....
Why worst? Don't you like Porsche? I prefer the GT3 (RS).worst till last.......looks awful in red
Why worst? Don't you like Porsche? I prefer the GT3 (RS).
Sarcasm aside, the guy probably owns a Subway or two.Are these standard wheels? For some reason this Conti seemed more bad-ass then all the others I've seen.
*snip*
The Number Plate was 'Subman', 2 shops to the left of the Chicken shop is a subway, so one can only assume he does an awful lot of shifts there....
Are these standard wheels?
Is the number plate how much *snip* she paid for it?
I like how it's in front of a chicken shack . That doesn't seem like something a Bentley client would be at.
Ony my way to school today I saw a Porsche Boxster parked outside a house!