DIRTY ENDURANCE RACING LEAGUE (DERL)

  • Thread starter JKRACING23
  • 5,290 comments
  • 134,074 views
That's a stupid reason not to get gold on something. Cards is right if you don't want it sell it and it's a free car regardless. It's actually not a bad car.

I think I got gold on all of them.
 
How about Chris Buescher winning at Pocono and Regan Smith getting 3rd!!!!!!!

Race for week 9 are;
580pp LFAs SS Route 5
400hp 1201kg Japan track vote
460pp VW Lupos track vote
480pp 2001 & 2002 AWD track vote

Apparently according to Kaz sport is basically 7. I don't know if I'd call a full GT title starting with 140 cars and fewer tracks then 6 a 'full' game. To me this looks like a typical GT half ass game. Just in this case they've re branded it cause GT5 P was so bad and they want people to get sport. If what Kaz is saying is legit we could have a long 3 years of sport if the game after sport is kinda suppose to GT8. I really hope that sport is a legit game and if it isn't we get a legit 7 in like a year but I doubt it.

Barrett finally got his premium.
 
Last edited:
JKRACING23
How about Chris Buescher winning at Pocono and Regan Smith getting 3rd!!!!!!!

Race for week 9 are;
580pp LFAs SS Route 5
400hp 1201kg Japan track vote
460pp VW Lupos track vote
480pp 2001 & 2002 AWD track vote

Apparently according to Kaz sport is basically 7. I don't know if I'd call a full GT title starting with 140 cars and fewer tracks then 6 a 'full' game. To me this looks like a typical GT half ass game. Just in this case they've re branded it cause GT5 P was so bad and they want people to get sport. If what Kaz is saying is legit we could have a long 3 years of sport if the game after sport is kinda suppose to GT8. I really hope that sport is a legit game and if it isn't we get a legit 7 in like a year but I doubt it.

Barrett finally got his premium.
Click to expand...
As long as the servers are consistent and reliable Sport will be worth getting in my opinion.

I still would like more cars and tracks though.
 
JKRACING23
How about Chris Buescher winning at Pocono and Regan Smith getting 3rd!!!!!!!

Race for week 9 are;
580pp LFAs SS Route 5
400hp 1201kg Japan track vote
460pp VW Lupos track vote
480pp 2001 & 2002 AWD track vote

Apparently according to Kaz sport is basically 7. I don't know if I'd call a full GT title starting with 140 cars and fewer tracks then 6 a 'full' game. To me this looks like a typical GT half ass game. Just in this case they've re branded it cause GT5 P was so bad and they want people to get sport. If what Kaz is saying is legit we could have a long 3 years of sport if the game after sport is kinda suppose to GT8. I really hope that sport is a legit game and if it isn't we get a legit 7 in like a year but I doubt it.

Barrett finally got his premium.
Click to expand...
I told you a long time ago that sport could be 7 but you didn't listen to me @JKRACING23.
 
It was more out of hope then anything else. Cause after how bad GT6 has been especially lately I think we all need a really good next game.

And you've only been playing GT since December so you don't know how PD appears to operate.
 
JKRACING23
It was more out of hope then anything else. Cause after how bad GT6 has been especially lately I think we all need a really good next game.

And you've only been playing GT since December so you don't know how PD appears to operate.
Click to expand...
It's common sense really.
 
But PD doesn't operate with common sense. As we've learned over the years. Better graphics, bigger car selection, take good tracks away, have crappy servers, make offline worse and worse, make the career pathetic, ruin Daytona then say it was the PS3s fault.
 
JKRACING23
But PD doesn't operate with common sense. As we've learned over the years. Better graphics, bigger car selection, take good tracks away, have crappy servers, make offline worse and worse, make the career pathetic, ruin Daytona then say it was the PS3s fault.
Click to expand...
well servers yea they could blame the ps3. The ps3 was crap for online games.
 
I doubt it that if you asked the developers for some games on PS3 they would say it sucked. I think Kaz is making an excuse for why 5P was crappy 5 was boarder line as good as 4 pound for pound after how many years of development and 6 is worse then 5 and it seems with every day the severs get worse. I could forgive it if the offline was good cause then you have a backup but the offline it probably the worst in the series. They must have taken a leaf out of Call of Duty's book make a few really great games then once you have people hooked and people believe the next game will be better then give up trying.
 
JKRACING23
I doubt it that if you asked the developers for some games on PS3 they would say it sucked. I think Kaz is making an excuse for why 5P was crappy 5 was boarder line as good as 4 pound for pound after how many years of development and 6 is worse then 5 and it seems with every day the severs get worse. I could forgive it if the offline was good cause then you have a backup but the offline it probably the worst in the series. They must have taken a leaf out of Call of Duty's book make a few really great games then once you have people hooked and people believe the next game will be better then give up trying.
Click to expand...
Call of duty went south or down the hole in 2012. :) But they make a new game every year and make it so easy and so bad that even you could do good at it. xD Put on PS3 the servers would usually lag so.
 
megadarklord
Call of duty went south or down the hole in 2012. :) But they make a new game every year and make it so easy and so bad that even you could do good at it. xD Put on PS3 the servers would usually lag so.
Click to expand...
Need for Speed is the same way, a lot of the fans of the PS2 era games (including me) were hopeful when "Underground 3" (GT7) rumors started. Then it became known that it would be called 2015 (GT Sport) and hope dwindled a bit. Soon in game photos and a trailer came out. The graphics look awesome and hope is renewed. Once the car list came out... with mostly pretty looking new cars but not nearly as many as expected the critics started having mixed opinions.
Then the game was released. It was arguably one of the best looking games ever and the livery editor was a great addition. Sadly, the physics were downright terrible and we're hated by most. A lot of people could forgive the small car list and gimmicky name if it didn't have bad physics, but because the cars were pretty much unresponsive for today's standards, the game was borderline unplayable.
GT Sport seems to be going down the same road so far as NFS 2015. the series's heyday has come and gone and fans want a game that is as good as ones 15 years ago. What PD should focus on now that we have seen the graphics and car list is making the gameplay fun. Not in the physics aspect like NFS because I'm sure the cars will drive like they should, but by making the offline have substance and having online servers be as glitch free and stable as possible.
Need for Speed did get updates and new cars, but never got better physics. PD should learn from EA's mistake of putting fluff over functionality and above all make GT Sport an enjoyable game to play.
 
MOPARbarrett5
Need for Speed is the same way, a lot of the fans of the PS2 era games (including me) were hopeful when "Underground 3" (GT7) rumors started. Then it became known that it would be called 2015 (GT Sport) and hope dwindled a bit. Soon in game photos and a trailer came out. The graphics look awesome and hope is renewed. Once the car list came out... with mostly pretty looking new cars but not nearly as many as expected the critics started having mixed opinions.
Then the game was released. It was arguably one of the best looking games ever and the livery editor was a great addition. Sadly, the physical were downright terrible and we're hated by most. A lot of people could forgive the small car list and gimmicky name if it didn't have bad physical, but because the cars were pretty much unresponsive for today's standards, the game was borderline unplayable.
GT Sport seems to be going down the same road so far as NFS 2015. the series's heyday has come and gone and fans want a game that is as good as ones 15 years ago. What PD should focus on now that we have seen the graphics and car list is making the gameplay fun. Not in the physics aspect like NFS because I'm sure the cars will drive like they should, but by making the offline have substance and having online servers be as glitch free and stable as possible.
Need for Speed did get updates and new cars, but never got better physics. PD should learn from EA's mistake of putting fluff over functionality and above all make GT Sport an enjoyable game to play.
Click to expand...
The thing is barrett it isn't EA's fault (well most of it) its Ghost. They ruined Need for speed for the true fans and etc. Look at the games before Ghost was evolved they were great (most of the time) but when Ghost came along Need for speed went downhill and it was sad to see. But the New Need for speed focused on graphics more then Gameplay and (cut scenes) I Wanted A new Carbon but now I don't all because of Ghost. Ghost Lied when they were releasing 2015 Need for speed they said it would feel like Need for speed Underground but they lied. Customisation sucked a lot and the car selection was not the best.
 
megadarklord
Call of duty went south or down the hole in 2012. :) But they make a new game every year and make it so easy and so bad that even you could do good at it. xD Put on PS3 the servers would usually lag so.
Click to expand...

No matter how easy they make COD I suck at it.

Both Undergrounds were awesome. And I agree barrett PD should basically go back to what drew us to the series but IMPROVE it. GT4 was epic. It had a huge career, good car list, and probably really good physics for the time. If I was Kaz I'd re create GT4 just improve the car list to 800 or so different cars we have and make more premium at minimum keep the career the same or make it bigger. And obviously FIX THE BLOODY SERVERS. I won't believe the 500 DLC cars till I see it cause we are still missing photos let alone cars for VGT and the game has been out for over 2 1/2 years.
 
megadarklord
The thing is barrett it isn't EA's fault (well most of it) its Ghost. They ruined Need for speed for the true fans and etc. Look at the games before Ghost was evolved they were great (most of the time) but when Ghost came along Need for speed went downhill and it was sad to see. But the New Need for speed focused on graphics more then Gameplay and (cut scenes) I Wanted A new Carbon but now I don't all because of Ghost. Ghost Lied when they were releasing 2015 Need for speed they said it would feel like Need for speed Underground but they lied. Customisation sucked a lot and the car selection was not the best.
Click to expand...
I don't really care who's fault it is, I just want a good game. What were the companies involved with the PS2 games? Maybe they could partner with EA again. Time will tell if it is good or bad, but quality companies who have been quiet for awhile are coming back (NASCAR Heat and original Burnout companies).
JKRACING23
No matter how easy they make COD I suck at it.

Both Undergrounds were awesome. And I agree barrett PD should basically go back to what drew us to the series but IMPROVE it. GT4 was epic. It had a huge career, good car list, and probably really good physics for the time. If I was Kaz I'd re create GT4 just improve the car list to 800 or so different cars we have and make more premium at minimum keep the career the same or make it bigger. And obviously FIX THE BLOODY SERVERS. I won't believe the 500 DLC cars till I see it cause we are still missing photos let alone cars for VGT and the game has been out for over 2 1/2 years.
Click to expand...
GT4 was the best overall game because it had everything GT3 had plus more and many, many more cars. GT6 on the other hand had some key features of GT5 taken out (shuffle racing) and only had about 15% or so more cars. Also the release timing of GT6 was bad, coming out right after the PS4 made a lot of people not care about it and it seemed obsolete on release. GT4 came out when the PS2 was the main system, HD was first being used and there was a chance of it being online (a few copies had online access).
There was no way GT6 could have done as good selling as the others and Sport will probably outsell it. GT Sport doesn't really need to be made like GT4, it just needs to not be like GT6. Luckily it doesn't seem to be like GT6 as of now.
 
MOPARbarrett5
I don't really care who's fault it is, I just want a good game. What were the companies involved with the PS2 games? Maybe they could partner with EA again. Time will tell if it is good or bad, but quality companies who have been quiet for awhile are coming back (NASCAR Heat and original Burnout companies).

GT4 was the best overall game because it had everything GT3 had plus more and many, many more cars. GT6 on the other hand had some key features of GT5 taken out (shuffle racing) and only had about 15% or so more cars. Also the release timing of GT6 was bad, coming out right after the PS4 made a lot of people not care about it and it seemed obsolete on release. GT4 came out when the PS2 was the main system, HD was first being used and there was a chance of it being online (a few copies had online access).
There was no way GT6 could have done as good selling as the others and Sport will probably outsell it. GT Sport doesn't really need to be made like GT4, it just needs to not be like GT6. Luckily it doesn't seem to be like GT6 as of now.
Click to expand...
That's the reason I didn't buy 6 when it didn't come out. It came out at the worse time ever I thought it was gonna be on the ps4 and when I herd it was gonna be on the PS3 I just didn't bother buying it.
 
Ya 6 should have came out earlier on the 3 or maybe slightly later on the 4. It probably didn't come out on the 4 because the 4 was so new PD probably thought no enough people would have the 4 to get it. Obviously PD and rockstar don't collaborate very much cause if they had PD probably would have done and should have done the same thing as GTA. Launch it on the PS3 then a couple of months later put it on the 4 or release it at the same time on both and be able to transfer game date. GTA mastered the late in a consoles life release. PD completely bungled it.
 
JKRACING23
Ya 6 should have came out earlier on the 3 or maybe slightly later on the 4. It probably didn't come out on the 4 because the 4 was so new PD probably thought no enough people would have the 4 to get it. Obviously PD and rockstar don't collaborate very much cause if they had PD probably would have done and should have done the same thing as GTA. Launch it on the PS3 then a couple of months later put it on the 4 or release it at the same time on both and be able to transfer game date. GTA mastered the late in a consoles life release. PD completely bungled it.
Click to expand...
GTA 5 is still the fastest selling entertainment product ever, GT6 probably is the slowest selling of the major GTs ever. What is ironic about this is Rockstar put tons of money into GTA 5 and got tons more out of it. PD didn't even have TV commercials for 6. If only more money was put into GT6...
 
MOPARbarrett5
GTA 5 is still the fastest selling entertainment product ever, GT6 probably is the slowest selling of the major GTs ever. What is ironic about this is Rockstar put tons of money into GTA 5 and got tons more out of it. PD didn't even have TV commercials for 6. If only more money was put into GT6...
Click to expand...
Hey barrett don't post gta 5 glitches anymore. Rockstar is striking channels who do that so :).
 
Why YouTube isn't owned by rockstar as long as Barrett isn't plagiarizing he should be fine. And if there are glitches they should fix them not ban channels that expose them. Aren't most of those crazy made up races and LTSs glitches in some way and people make tonnes of them. That's like PD getting all YouTube channels banned that have people with fiats with red bull chassis.

It's going to be hard for GT to sell any were close to GTA but GTA would have sold regardless of if they made commercials. Simulators just aren't as popular as games like GTA or COD. So I'm happy they didn't waste anymore money on commercials and spent it on the game even though the game is crap but it might have been worse is they'd put money in to advertisement. Cause then they'd also have even more angry people who bought the game after not planning to but saw the commercials and thought it looked good.
 
Last edited:
JKRACING23
Why YouTube isn't owned by rockstar as long as Barrett isn't plagiarizing he should be fine. And if there are glitches they should fix them not ban channels that expose them. Aren't most of those crazy made up races and LTSs glitches in some way and people make tonnes of them. That's like PD getting all YouTube channels banned that have people with fiats with red bull chassis.

It's going to be hard for GT to sell any were close to GTA but GTA would have sold regardless of if they made commercials. Simulators just aren't as popular as games like GTA or COD. So I'm happy they didn't waste anymore money on commercials and spent it on the game even though the game is crap but it might have been worse is they'd put money in to advertisement. Cause then they'd also have even more angry people who bought the game after not planning to but saw the commercials and thought it looked good.
Click to expand...
I'm out this week I'm at the beach. And is Barrett posting glitches online? Because if they are offline Rockstar doesn't care.
 

Similar threads

Benny44
Benny's Beer League Racing
Replies
0
Views
1K
Benny44
Benny44
MOPARbarrett5
Wreckfest Dirty Endurance Racing League
Replies
0
Views
1K
MOPARbarrett5
MOPARbarrett5
AuzKangaroo94
Gr.3 Dunlop Championship 2025
Replies
1
Views
302
AuzKangaroo94
AuzKangaroo94
zer05ive
◆ SNAIL [Spec] Racing - Join now to win a Digit Racing EDGE Masterclass enrollment!!
Replies
1
Views
727
A_Higher_Place
A_Higher_Place
addictions
Widdowmaker racing league
Replies
3
Views
1K
Bowtner
Bowtner

Latest Posts

Back