You warn me? Pound sand. But here's my answer:
The individuals who flew the planes into the twin towers did so BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY BELIEVED. They believed that they were doing the right thing according to Allah (yet another delusional belief system). Without said beliefs of promises of 72 virgins awaiting them in the afterlife, the event would likely not have occured. It should be a painfully good example of why it matters what we believe.
Non-religious man flies plane into IRS building because of Federal policy.
I don't have a problem with you believing in God if it doesn't affect anyone else. However it's important for people to understand the implications of believing things without evidence and what consequences that may have. I know you're intelligent enough to have thought about this, and though I don't know exactly why you believe there is a god, I'm totally okay with you believing it. I also know that you admit you could be wrong, something which many other believers could benefit to do.
I'm not religous person, but I'll still play the ball.
Tic Tach
I don't see how you could know that .
Evolution is science fact , tried and tested .
Neutrinos are not mass , they are small non-zero mass . The speed of light barrier has little to do with the question I asked . And no , the experiments re-run does not disprove evolution as a fact . 👍
I for one am not scared of death, hopefully it will come later than sooner, the unknown outcome of the transition is what bothers me. But at the end of the day, either you'll be nothing, or you'll be living a second life that is hopefully more pleasant than the first one.
I am currently studying Physics and I'm an amateur astronomer, so I tend to pursue Science a lot more than my religion. I don't attend church, but I believe in intelligent design, an afterlife, and I go by the moral values Christianity has to offer. It's easy enough for me to do scientific research without bringing God into the mix, unless of course the HST looks back 14.5 billion years and sees God lighting some TNT or whatever!
Ahhh , that's what they taught you in school right ? All atheists are evil ? ..... Hmm interesting.
How can science prove something without doubt? To do that would require universal understanding, or at least accepting, of the method and findings of the scientists involved. Scientists have claimed unquestionable certainty before, and been later proved wrong. Hence a doubt will always remain amongst even the learned population.
Incorrect. Genetic mutation is fact. Adapt and survive is fact. But evolution takes millions of years to show significant results in large multi-cell organisms, hence we haven't had the time to prove it with experimental data. It's like testing medicine on mice and applying the results to humans when comparing few-cell "evolutions" with large multi-cell organisms. I don't dispute evolutionary theory, but I you shouldn't maintain it as fact.
The speed of light has been taken as fact for several decades now. And in contemporary physics was believed to be indisputable.
You warn me? Pound sand. But here's my answer:
The individuals who flew the planes into the twin towers did so BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY BELIEVED. They believed that they were doing the right thing according to Allah (yet another delusional belief system). Without said beliefs of promises of 72 virgins awaiting them in the afterlife, the event would likely not have occured. It should be a painfully good example of why it matters what we believe.
