Danoff
Premium
- 34,045
- Mile High City
To the contrary, it has been clearly demonstrated and established.
If it is not, then who may I ask is choosing your beliefs for you.
In the sense that you use the word "belief", I have only one belief - that I exist. Everything else is not a belief, but rather an assumption based on probability.
As I said in my previous post, this has been explained in this thread countless times. So please refrain from making the assertion that I rely on beliefs or faith to function in everyday life. It is absolutely 100% false. I will continue to call you out every time I see you making this claim.
I report from the findings of my investigation. Each person should do their own.
Ok, now please respond to my original statement.
meNot according to you. According to you it requires the unsupported CONCLUSION that god is real. It requires BELIEF, not an investigation.
You cannot investigate a lack of evidence - and faith is not an investigation.
As with everything else each must draw their own conclusion.
You missed the point (quite deliberately I'm afraid). The point is that you have no more basis for your conclusion than they have for theirs.
I've already answered that two or three times.
Link.
As long as you can dismiss evidence to the contrary.
As pointed out the cynic will not recognize evidence, reguardless of merit.
Look. You can't have it both ways. Sorry, you just can't. I know you want to, you want to really really badly, but you can't. Ok? So you have two choices, either you get to have faith, or evidence. You do not get to have both. If you have evidence, you don't have faith. If you have faith, you can't have evidence.
Now, you MIGHT have evidence AFTER you have faith. But as soon as you have evidence you no longer have faith - and my point is about the very beginning of the process. That part where you're required to have faith (which, btw, requires an absence of evidence).
I have concluded my investigation. Again each person should do their own.
I have done an investigation (unlike you - who took a leap of faith). My investigation was performed in a much more rigorous and logical manner than your leap of faith was - and that makes it more valid. My conclusion is that your God does not exist. He is a fabrication of the imagination of human beings from a time when we thought lightning was magic. All evidence points to that. You can show me no evidence whatsoever that points to the contrary - and you (and all other Christians) admit this freely by stating that faith is required.
So a million people tell essentially the same lie about the same experience?
Lack of bloodflow to the brain - repeatable hallucinations.
Last edited: