- 2,541
- Netherlands
- Denur; GTP_Denur
I think it's the other way around...
![]()
That little "mistake" was quite intensional.
I think it's the other way around...
![]()
The first few lines are not really very interesting. Holy god, let's follow your commandments. Ok fine whatever that's part of Christianity. But then we get into the "daily bread" line where we're somehow supposed to praise God for our own work, and that's something I really hate about religion. Why must we absolutely refuse to take credit for anything in religion.
You appear not to be looking at the screen at all today when you post. I can't see anything above about a grail in a Spanish church.According to Dr Jones the cup of christ is not made of gold since gold was a the cup was not a cup of a carpenter.
So the cup of christ in the spanish church is clearly a fake.
According to Dr Jones the cup of christ is not made of gold since gold was a the cup was not a cup of a carpenter.
So the cup of christ in the spanish church is clearly a fake.
Sure, if you ignore the doctrine in many religions about converting the unbelievers and the entirety of history involving the persecution of nonbelievers by "the faithful".If you don't believe in God, then don't, nobody is making you.
Sure, if you ignore the doctrine in many religions about converting the unbelievers and the entirety of history involving the persecution of nonbelievers by "the faithful".
Sharing opinion in a forum thread is hardly "forcing".
Why is that "better" when religion is trying to force its way into science teaching and lawmaking in place of sense?Then be the better man. If you don't believe in God, then stop yelling about people who do.
Thanks for the permission.Yes sharing your opinion is fine
What about adult debate without anyone getting mad? That's what happens here most of the time.arguing with people and getting mad when they don't see it your way is something else.
Why do people who don't believe in God always try to force their opinions on people who do? If you don't believe in God, then don't, nobody is making you.
Why is that "better" when religion is trying to force its way into science teaching and lawmaking in place of sense?
It' not. Just because someone wants to say a prayer in school doesn't mean you have to. OTOH, I've seen plenty of times where someone is harassed for being religious or expressing their religious beliefs. That very thing is happening with Hobby Lobby and the Obamacare contraceptive mandate right now.
Did we all imagine the teaching of evolution as fact being banned then? Did we imagine that science textbooks had to include phrasing that suggested evolution was "only a theory" and a single explanation of many that could be equally valid?It' not.
I've not been to school for many, many years now - but when a science textbook has to, by law include idiotic Creationist fantasies that evolution is no more valid that "poof, God did it in 7 days", you're in a situation where religion is forcing its way into science teaching in place of sense.Just because someone wants to say a prayer in school doesn't mean you have to.
And you'll find the atheists on this forum defending them - while attacking Obamacare itself.OTOH, I've seen plenty of times where someone is harassed for being religious or expressing their religious beliefs. That very thing is happening with Hobby Lobby and the Obamacare contraceptive mandate right now.
So why has the UK had to put in place legislation to stop faith school redacting exam questions that mention evolution?It' not.
Yes because school behave ideally in this regard don't they.Just because someone wants to say a prayer in school doesn't mean you have to.
So why has the UK had to put in place legislation to stop faith school redacting exam questions that mention evolution?
http://www.education11kbw.com/2014/03/31/faith-schools-banned-from-redacting-evolution-questions/
Why has an entire country stated that being an atheist makes you a terrorist?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ack-down-on-political-dissidents-9228389.html
Religion is far from 'hands off' when it comes to every area of life, so given that it wants to try and walk right over mine I think I will continue to exercise the right of reply.
Now please don't get me wrong I totally support your right to religious freedom (almost certainly to a far greater degree than many religions do - which is kind of ironic), but I certainly don't respect religion itself and certainly do not recognise that religions as having any 'right' (people have rights, religions don't).
Yes because school behave ideally in this regard don't they.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/...led-told-to-accept-it-leave-school-or-convert
Why has an entire country stated that being an atheist makes you a terrorist?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ack-down-on-political-dissidents-9228389.html
He actually supported his point in several ways. What I don't see is you refuting it in any way...Saudi Arabia? Really? You're going to use them to support your point?
I've had lots of people come knocking on my door trying to persuade me to adopt their religion. I've had any number of people handing me flyers about their God(s) in airports and other public facilities. I have never, ever seen an atheist do anything remotely similar.Why do people who don't believe in God always try to force their opinions on people who do? If you don't believe in God, then don't, nobody is making you.
Actually I used numerous example to support my point, one of them being Saudi (and given that its an area of the world I work in from time to time its rather relevant to my point).Saudi Arabia? Really? You're going to use them to support your point?
Believing in God is one of the more amazing applications of the human mind (I think both sides see it that way).
This is invariably at the hands of people who are themselves religious, of a different religion obviously.I've seen plenty of times where someone is harassed for being religious or expressing their religious beliefs.
Premise 1: Either the Bible is the Word of God or it is not.
Premise 2: If the Bible is the Word of God, the Qur’an is not.
Premise 3: If the Bible is not the Word of God, the Qur’an is not.
Conclusion: Therefore, the Qur’an is not the Word of God.
Premise 1: Either the Qur’an is the Word of Allah or it is not.
Premise 2: If the Qur’an is the Word of Allah, the Bible is not.
Premise 3: If the Qur’an is not the Word of Allah, the Bible is not.
Conclusion: Therefore, the Bible is not the Word of Allah.
Christians and Jews may disagree with the Koran but if they know their bibles, they will agree upon Gods blessings of the Arab people.My mate reposted this on Facebook....
http://www.christianapologeticsalli...ason-why-the-quran-cannot-be-the-word-of-god/
The fact that it was published on 1st April but is evidently not a joke just adds to the fun factor.
I will confess, I didn't make it beyond this pseudo-logical deduction (OK, so I didn't read the bit before it either) but it is still chucklesome.
I'm just waiting for the inevitable rebuttal:
So how come a god can't get the right message out? Seems to have managed to get three groups of people who follow him (not including the hundreds of sub-sects) to dedicate thousands of years killing each other instead?Christians and Jews may disagree with the Koran but if they know their bibles, they will agree upon Gods blessings of the Arab people.
All three agree on only One God, who is the God of Abraham and the God of Noah, but they disagree on how to serve and worship God.
Which is why again? Seeing as all three groups have texts that specifically state your not allowed to follow god and eat pork (or prawns for that matter), yet Christians simply ignore it? Oh and please don't try the nonsense that the NT removes the OT laws, because it clearly doesn't.Also Jews and Muslims can't eat Bacon and Pork, Christians can eat pork.