If pre-born 'children' and children under (8?) get a free pass into heaven, who brings them up? A child is shaped as much by their upbringing as they are by their genetics. If a pre-born 'child' is granted an upbringing in heaven whilst their own parents are still shuffling along the mortal coil, i assume they're being brought up by strangers? By the time their parents arrive, if they even do, that child will have grown up a relative stranger, probably with a completely different set of beliefs. May may not even like their natural parents. Its like heavenly adoption or fostering. I can see many potential problems with this concept/scenario.
There will be a resurrection where the people who will be taking care of the children, etc., will be given the gift of immortality. Then, the parents of the children in question will be given the chance to raise their child to maturity.
Families are the MOST important part of an eternal existence, as they are in mortality.
Maybe this should go in the dumb questions thread.
But how does heaven work? (i do not believe in a god myself, but interested to see how people that do believe handle my next question.)
Do children who die, age in heaven. Or do they stay the same age.
If so, at what age do they stop aging?
Same goes for adults who die at a young age.
The simple answer is that there is eternal growth and learning. The more complex answer has to do with the why and how. But I'll answer that separately if you want that answer.
Edited to add: I was reminded of this video, and knew I should share it, but I didn't put it up. It's never good to ignore promptings:
I'm not a biblical scholar by any means nor am I Christian, but Thomas Acquinis made the argument that we will be 33 years old in heaven because that's the age Jesus was supposedly when he died and then climbed the stairway to heaven. Some also believe that we will get to choose our age when we get to heaven or that we will merely appear how we want to appear.
I remember asking this question when I was in Catholic school and the nun teaching our religion class seemed offended by it.
I don't think that is the best answer, but it's not bad. I feel that our bodies will be in their most prime condition that they ever could have been. But that's not for me to decide.
I wasn't being facetious when I asked about hallucinations.
I'm just wondering whether you've ever entertained that as an explanation, and why you dismissed it.
I was a bit surprised that you asked that, and I didn't want to get into an involved question. Thank you for clarifying.
I have never considered the experiences that I have had with messages from God (or, quite honestly, satan) to be hallucinations. They really do happen. It's just up to us to decide to follow whichever one.
Edit to add:
The idea that understanding God, or any gospel or "gospel", is more important than being a good person and caring about those around you (or simply communicate with) is sick, demented, and twisted.
In the end, the direction you face and the intentions you live for are more important than whether or not you believe much of anything.
But, like it says in Luke 12:47-48 (basically) If you know and accept, you will be held accountable for that.