(DRRTES) DRR's Team Endurance Series: Powered by MWMOpen 

  • Thread starter Sinyster
  • 928 comments
  • 40,471 views
I can safely say that while I have no clue of the track limits of this track, I have not been warned for any thus far. The only possible reason I have for this is very simple... It must mean that there is an area of track that I'm not attacking hard enough.
 
I can safely say that while I have no clue of the track limits of this track, I have not been warned for any thus far. The only possible reason I have for this is very simple... It must mean that there is an area of track that I'm not attacking hard enough.
Turn 20, track limits warnings were handed out left and right on that one during QP2 :lol:
 
I don't even know which corner is T20 :confused: :lol:
I googled a track map and according to that, T20 is the right hander after Conrod straight. If I'm right, I was getting tagged there cause I think I was taking a bit too much room over the white line on the outside.

@Peelster1 can you confirm?
 
Phishr
First Corner - Ripple strip OK, Bit of tarmac after it that GT6 thinks is dirt - outside the white line, and it kicks up dirt, and its slower than the race track. Don't use it, because you don't want to.
T20 - The tarmac on the outside of the white lines is off limits as per letter of the law "4 wheels within the white lines".
Esses - Curbing on the left is OK as per Peel's statement above.

After the cutting (T4), the track limits are the walls, until you get down out of Forrest Elbow (T19), when the white lines are back in play.

Storm - See above
Noir - Correct, T20 is the right hander into "The Chase", and using the tarmac on the left, past the white line is forbidden.
EH_Team - "Close", 1-3 in Pro class are within 3 tenths, top of Pro-Am also very close.

We are still missing a few pieces of information before we can publish everything. Entry List, Spotter's Guide, QP Results by Team, QP Results by Driver, Grid and Stewards Log will be out shortly.
 
I will state that while I indeed didn't have a number on my car I didn't explicitly receive a warning for no number for the session, in fact the only warning given out was to the #71 for no number... I changed mine before a warning could occur for my team. So, if you mistook my team for the 71, that's kinda not my problem lol...
 
Reminder: Race room will open in 24 hours. The race will start at 14:00 UTC on Saturday, October 8th. Please make sure that you have your starting driver ready to go by the room open time. We will be calling drivers into the lobby soon after. If you find your starting driver is suddenly unable to start, please send us a message in your team chat ASAP so that we may make needed changes.

I will state that while I indeed didn't have a number on my car I didn't explicitly receive a warning for no number for the session, in fact the only warning given out was to the #71 for no number... I changed mine before a warning could occur for my team. So, if you mistook my team for the 71, that's kinda not my problem lol...

We were in the process of typing out your warning when you left. All teams on track without their number get a warning. Keep in mind that not all warnings can be typed out during the session. Races also may have post-race penalties not typed out in race if time doesn't allow for the penalty to be issued in race. Further disputes should be handled in team PM.
 
I have a question.

I did the qualifying practice session and for some reason, I was issued a warning for not following instructions...
 
I just want to point out that the Grid lineup needs to be looked at... it says that CWM were overall 3rd in QP with 2:03.910, yet it states that TOR are third on the grid pdf with that time instead.
 
I just want to point out that the Grid lineup needs to be looked at... it says that CWM were overall 3rd in QP with 2:03.910, yet it states that TOR are third on the grid pdf with that time instead.
Might be a typo. Much as I'd love to have that extra place on the grid, i think that CWM should be starting 3rd
 
Might be a typo. Much as I'd love to have that extra place on the grid, i think that CWM should be starting 3rd
It doesn't make much of a difference to us really given we have a lengthy time penalty to serve, just something that might cause confusion on race day if not addressed now.
 
I did the qualifying practice session and for some reason, I was issued a warning for not following instructions...
When we had to create a new lobby drivers were told to wait until they were called. We also posted this on the forum:
CALLING DRIVERS INDIVIDUALLY TO THE ROOM.
WHEN YOU JOIN THE ROOM, IMMEDIATELY LOAD TO PITLANE, AND TYPE "BOX".
WAIT UNTIL YOUR TEAM NUMBER/NAME IS CALLED.
Number 24 Venator Racing, please join the room.
Those that joined before we called them were issued a penalty. The reason why we drip feed into the lobby is for Room Stability, so we don't crash another lobby by getting 12 people to join it at once.

I just want to point out that the Grid lineup needs to be looked at... it says that CWM were overall 3rd in QP with 2:03.910, yet it states that TOR are third on the grid pdf with that time instead.
You are correct, and this error has been corrected. Apologies for the confusion.
 
Last edited:
With some circumstance out of control, i'm looking for a driver tomorrow, Kross can't race unfortunately. I'm not really full of contact in GT6, if someone can make me enter in contact with a Driver i can give him all informations we have found on the Camaro. ( To the guy gonna driving with me, not to you lol )

In all case, i'll be there and drive the most time allowed for one driver.

Venator will be on the race track.
 
It's obviously far far too late for this but I just thought, why not BoP the Challenger to the Camaro? Sure it's not Ford but it's two big american companies that fight each other more often than not, which was sort of the spirit of V8SC before Nissan and the others joined up. Just a race night thought.
 
It's obviously far far too late for this but I just thought, why not BoP the Challenger to the Camaro? Sure it's not Ford but it's two big american companies that fight each other more often than not, which was sort of the spirit of V8SC before Nissan and the others joined up. Just a race night thought.
Funny enough, this was our original idea! We were desperate to get the Camaro and Challenger TC cars to match up and race each other, but sadly it couldn't be done, as the Challenger didn't have a similar enough downforce range, thus making the vehicle much too understeery, compared to the Camaro's oversteering capabilities.
 
Back