End of the road for manual shifters?

  • Thread starter Pebb
  • 254 comments
  • 16,805 views
I've never wanted to drive automatic, though I do understand why some people do. I believe the entire discussion over which is best has been covered by Scaff, Duke and others. The drive can be just as important, or even more so than the outright performance. There's a reason I always take my low powered 306 when I drive over the pennines alone over my significantly faster and more refined Bora.
 
If anybody wants to know why the dealers have so many automatics and so few manuals, take a look at the sticker and see what the automatic adds to the price. You think dealers and mfrs are going to give that up???

GM loads the dealers with automatics, then reports sales figures overwhelmingly favoring automatics, and uses that as justification to keep loading them up with automatics, at $1500-$3000 premium per car over stick shift.
 
I think Live4Speed just un-intentionally revealed the fact of the matter at hand...

This discussion has gone from the future of the manual transmission to which is better, auto or manual?

Because of all the support for the manual transmission, I'd say it is safe to assume manual transmissions will be availible in cars for a long time to come.

That said, I never wanted to drive an auto. :indiff:
It's more like the auto was the best choice because of reasons beyond my control. I believe many automatic drivers are in a similar situation.

Trust me, when I get a weekend car it will certainly be manual. :sly:

Btw, my auto cost 1,000 more and last time I checked, dealerships get to order the cars according to their predictions for sales... I suppose the manufacturer could leave absolutely no say in the matter for the dealership but I doubt it.
Plus, when you look at GM and many others you should account for the cars being sold... I've never met someone who wanted a Jimmy or Suburban made after '96 with a manual transmission.
But again, I don't really know so don't mind me. :D
 
My GM example was meant to be for cars like the Camaro/Firebird, Grand Prix, Cavalier Z24/Sunbird turbo, etc. Both available, sold as [exaggerate]99.9999995%[/exaggerate] autos.
 
About the automatic cup holder...
I doubt that came from Toyota because, hate them or not, they generally aren't dumb enough to make typos in their press releases...

I made up the Mr. Toyota Dood's quote, given that it isn't completely outrageous for Toyota to automate the cupholder; Completely unnecessary and utterly useless, and then they will get Car of the Year because of it.

Mr. Toyota Dood
Here at Toyota we believe in the power of the consumer to decide what they want, but we do them one better... We decide what is better for them. We're currently working on a new Hybrid Prius called the MiPo. It uses a chain-driven transmission that is shift-on-the-fly on the steering wheel. The only requirement is that the driver uses the new pedal system we must have in order to operate. Think of a bicycle, and you get the idea, because, well it isn't... Its a quadcycle!!!
 
Take it easy, :cheers:
Keep in mind that you didn't label the quote from "mr. toyota dood" but rather, "toyota representative."

It's not a big deal any way. 👍
Maybe not to you, but to me an automated cup holder is indeed outrageous (even for Toyota) to be taken seriously. That's also why I was quick to dis-believe the comment and took the oppurtunity to mention the basic rules of using quotations in both the real world and on the gtp. (although something as trivial as what you did would never even be close to trouble for the posting member)
So, all good. 👍 :cheers:

Back to the manual transmission's future now. :D
(which I believe has been well answered by various members) :sly:
 
Despite my love of driving, I had to put aside my selfish desire to be a "driver" and do what was best for my life and the life of those around me.
I'm sorry, but other than the injured ankle thing (which is rather important, mind you) I don't really see anything that would really prevent you from owning a manual tranny car. Especially not something that fights with any selfish desires.
 
Perhaps if it's a shared car, you know if he's not going to be the only person that uses it, that would be a factor, other than that I can't see any reason not to buy the transmission of your choice.
 
My GM example was meant to be for cars like the Camaro/Firebird, Grand Prix, Cavalier Z24/Sunbird turbo, etc. Both available, sold as [exaggerate]99.9999995%[/exaggerate] autos.

If that were the case I would've never found nor owned a 6 Speed Z28.


But I did.

Note that the 4 Speed autos are faster in the 1/4 than the 6 Speeds.
 
I'm sorry, but other than the injured ankle thing (which is rather important, mind you) I don't really see anything that would really prevent you from owning a manual tranny car. Especially not something that fights with any selfish desires.
I had a choice:

A) Buy an automatic transmission car so my wife could also drive it; or

B) Buy one car with a manual and a SECOND car with an automatic so my wife could drive that.

Fortunately I was able to afford option B. Not everybody can. And among those who can't afford two cars, not everyone is a teenager who can just say "screw you, I want a manual so that's what I'm getting, deal with it."

If that were the case I would've never found nor owned a 6 Speed Z28.


But I did.

What part of the giant [exaggerate] tags did you miss? Duh.
 
And among those who can't afford two cars, not everyone is a teenager who can just say "screw you, I want a manual so that's what I'm getting, deal with it."
Well, I'm truly sorry for my views, then. My girlfriend drives a Toyota Celica manual. My mother can very easily drive my dad's car, and her (rarely driven) car is also a 5 speed. I wasn't aware that all women were completely aghast and inept at the concept of three pedals, so I guess the manual transmission should die a horrible death.
 
What if Mrs. Duke doesn’t want to drive a manual? I don’t see what’s wrong with that.
 
What if Mrs. Duke doesn’t want to drive a manual? I don’t see what’s wrong with that.
There is nothing wrong with that. But I also don't understand why I would be viewed as a selfish teenager for asking a question that I was actually interested in the answer to, especially considering the vehicle I drive is not a manual anyways.
 
Well, I'm truly sorry for my views, then. My girlfriend drives a Toyota Celica manual. My mother can very easily drive my dad's car, and her (rarely driven) car is also a 5 speed. I wasn't aware that all women were completely aghast and inept at the concept of three pedals, so I guess the manual transmission should die a horrible death.
Women are not all "completely aghast and inept". In fact, about half of all small car sales to women are manual transmissions, compared to about 25% for men.

I successfully taught my wife how to drive a manual transmission car. She's perfectly capable of it - she just doesn't see why she should have to, when the car is perfectly capable of shifting itself. I consider her an enthusiastic driver - it took us quite some time to find a car for her that had enough 'fun factor' to make her like it. That factor just didn't include having 3 pedals and extra arm motion. So why should I make her do something that means she enjoys driving less?

Just like Doug's opinion - I don't take any exception at all to him wanting an ATX. I just take exception to him saying that anyone who wants an MTX is stupid.
I also don't understand why I would be viewed as a selfish teenager for asking a question that I was actually interested in the answer to, especially considering the vehicle I drive is not a manual anyways.
This was your post that prompted my reply:
I'm sorry, but other than the injured ankle thing (which is rather important, mind you) I don't really see anything that would really prevent you from owning a manual tranny car. Especially not something that fights with any selfish desires.
You're saying RIGHT HERE that you have no consideration for having to share a car with someone who doesn't like a manual! In other words, what you want is what goes. I demonstrated how you could be placed in the situation where your desire for a manual conflicts with the need for an automatic.
 
You're saying RIGHT HERE that you have no consideration for having to share a car with someone who doesn't like a manual! In other words, what you want is what goes.
No, I wasn't. I was saying that I didn't understand what need would come before the want of a manual, as in: I didn't realise at the time that spouses may or may not want one. I was NOT saying that if I want a manual, I get a manual. I was asking what would get in the way of getting a manual, and why wanting a manual would be viewed as selfish.
Duke
I demonstrated how you could be placed in the situation where your desire for a manual conflicts with the need for an automatic.
And thank you for that. You answered my question and gave multiple reasons. But I didn't feel the condescension was necessary. That was what set me off in my response to said post, not the actual content.
 
I was asking what would get in the way of getting a manual, and why wanting a manual would be viewed as selfish.
Well, I managed to totally miss that part. I apologize for the condescension. Thanks for explaining.
 
I can drive this very well though:

Image.aspx

Real noobs question coming up (consider I've never been in an Automatic car and taken notice of it's use).

I know what P, R, N and D do. What about 3, 2 and 1. I assume it's relevant to speed does it work like how it does on a manual? Ie, the higher the number essentially the more power available?
 
I know what P, R, N and D do. What about 3, 2 and 1. I assume it's relevant to speed does it work like how it does on a manual? Ie, the higher the number essentially the more power available?
The numbers hold the transmission in said gear. For example, putting it in "1" forces the transmission to stay in that gear and rev until you put it in "2." However, this is different from a manual transmission because the engine can still downshift and upshift to that gear, just not above it (though this varies, as some trannies lock it into that gear until you shift). It is for low traction areas, I believe.



Thank you Interstate '76.
 
Sad reality is, for most of us, buying a regular car with a manual is becoming an increasingly remote possibility. That's about the only reason I haven't upgraded to a new Focus or Mazda3, simply because our local dealerships won't offer them in MT.
Because the people buying entry-level vehicles don't want MTs. This is extremely frustrating to the rest of us. There are 213 Mazda 3's on dealer lots within 150 miles of here. Of those, 27 are 5-speeds. That's a whopping 17%. Lots of fun if you want to be picky about trim and color :). I got quite lucky when I bought my car; I didn't have to travel across the state to find the one I wanted.
Toronado
The numbers hold the transmission in said gear. For example, putting it in "1" forces the transmission to stay in that gear and rev until you put it in "2." However, this is different from a manual transmission because the engine can still downshift and upshift to that gear, just not above it (though I am less sure about this part).
That sounds almost as fun as shifting gears on a lawn tractor. In that case, you have to come to a complete stop before shifting into another gear 👍.
 
There are 213 Mazda 3's on dealer lots within 150 miles of here. Of those, 27 are 5-speeds. That's a whopping 17%. Lots of fun if you want to be picky about trim and color :).
And you’re lucky. ;) My local dealer had precisely two manual Mazda 3’s in their lot (and it’s a fairly large Mazda-Mercury-Volvo dealer). I had to wait two weeks for a boat to come in with a car that had similar (though not exact) specs to what I wanted.
 
Actually, I don't think you do. Though I'm by no means sure, and I'm too lazy to go check on my truck.

You don't have to stop or slow down to move between the numbers on any automatic that I've been in. In both the Mercedes I drive you can actually hold each gear as long as you want by moving the lever a certain way, this method is often used and supposedly doesn't cause any excess wear. (just a little more because you are moving the shifter more) this also helps when merging as you can down shift without flooring it. putting the car in "2" starts the car out in 1st (normally starts in 2nd unless you floor it) moving it to "3" then immediately back to "2" shifts to 2nd and holds that until you move it to "3" again and leave it there, moving it to "D" allows the car to shift into 4th. I don't think this works on most automatics but it is fairly common and well known among older Mercedes autos. If I could find my car with a manual I would snap it up as I love driving stick and they are pretty rare (300 sold between 86 and 89).
 
It's just simply not as involving and fun to drive. End of story.

And now, it's not as fast either. End of story.

I just take exception to him saying that anyone who wants an MTX is stupid.

Ironic considering I didn't say that, nor do I think that. I also find it funny that you seem to think automatics offer no driving pleasure, and that I have no idea how to get pleasure from driving. :rolleyes:
 
GM loads the dealers with automatics, then reports sales figures overwhelmingly favoring automatics, and uses that as justification to keep loading them up with automatics, at $1500-$3000 premium per car over stick shift.

Interesting counterpoint:

The General has been quite spectacular in offering manual transmissions in most of their new models as of late. Although not every model can be had with one, a growing number of them can, and for the most part have been welcome additions to the lineup... Although it may be questionable how many are there... But I think what is most important is that it is offered as a choice...

But even then, GM's automatics aren't that bad. For God's sake, BMW was still using them with the previous X5 for quite some time. The 4L80E is still probably one of the strongest automatics available on the market, probably one of the most reliable as well, and I'm certain that the well-regarded 6L80E successor will do just fine as well.
 
I also find it funny that you seem to think automatics offer no driving pleasure, and that I have no idea how to get pleasure from driving. :rolleyes:

Don't take this wrong. It reads with a harsher tone than I'm actually trying to use, OK? :dopey:

Please stop criticizing the manual drivers who prefer their manuals. They've driven both, and they understand the differences. As has been stated, it's not about speed and only speed, although it's only been recently that an auto could keep up with an otherwise identical and well-driven manual. I hope by speed you're not simply talking about shift speed. Yes, an auto changes ratios faster than any clutch-operated shift ever will (aside from the computer-controlled semi-auto manuals you get on Ferraris, Astons and the like), but that does NOT equate to performance. Torque converter slippage and shortage of ratios has always been the bane of an automatic transmission. A 5 or 6-speed Camaro would kill any similarly-powered auto Camaro, with its 3-speed, maybe 4-speed auto because the torque converter converts a significant amount of your torque to heat, rather than transmitting it through to the transmission. Fewer ratios in the auto meant that the engine had to run further outside its optimum power band for longer than with the manual, as well.

I'm not going to say that you take no pleasure in your driving, as that is obviously not the case. I AM going to say that what you don't understand is that operating the clutch and shifter is one of the greater pleasures of driving for those of us who do it well, and it's obvious that this IS the case. Especially if your understanding of the car is so incomplete as to believe that a shifter with P, R, and D on it was a manual. (If you were kidding, then I retract the remark with full apologies.)

Basically, all the guys here stating their preference for manual have driven both, and learned both well enough to make a choice. You have driven autos, and I've read nothing to say that you've even tried to learn a manual. That's like me criticizing my son's choice of surfboard: I've never surfed, I've never even paddled out on a board as a flotation device. What business do I have telling him his board sucks next to such-and-such other board? Similarly, if your skill level with a clutch is bang-bang-bang-stall, or smoke smoke smoke burn, then kindly stf up about it. :sly: You're welcome to meet any of us at any autocross event anywhere and see how your "speed" stacks up against the rest of us.

One thing an automatic simply cannot do, is be ready for you. It won't downshift until you nail the gas out of the turn, which is a delay, and may kick the car out of sorts. (Also, I find in a manual I may want to give a good amount of throttle briefly, but I DON'T want a downshift. Can't be done in an auto unless you've got one of those gated selector thingies to control it, and SOME of those still downshift, even if it won't upshift out of the selected gear. Nothing says loss of performance like an auto not making a decision.) If you selectively downshift, it cannot be done as smoothly as a heel-and-toe stick downshift, and downshifting an auto may upset the car if you're hard enough on the brakes to be near lockup already; the downshift will grab your wheels and throw the car out of whack. That lack of smoothness includes the "tip-tronic" selectable sequential automatics, unless they've got really expensive electronics synching everything up during the downshift. A manual in the proper hands is in the next gear during the turn, waiting for you to get on the gas.

So.

Obviously you prefer your auto. Tell us why, instead of calling us posers, claiming it's faster, whatever. We're telling you why we like the stick shift, you're calling us names.


Interesting counterpoint:

The General has been quite spectacular in offering manual transmissions in most of their new models as of late. Although not every model can be had with one, a growing number of them can, and for the most part have been welcome additions to the lineup... Although it may be questionable how many are there... But I think what is most important is that it is offered as a choice...

But even then, GM's automatics aren't that bad. For God's sake, BMW was still using them with the previous X5 for quite some time. The 4L80E is still probably one of the strongest automatics available on the market, probably one of the most reliable as well, and I'm certain that the well-regarded 6L80E successor will do just fine as well.

Agreed. Cadillac CTS, Pontiac G6, etc. And outside of GM, you could even get a manual in a Lincoln here of late! It's encouraging, or would be if I hadn't sworn never to buy another GM car in my life after my '87 Z24 Cavalier. (Great autocrosser, but a piece of poo-poo. Electronic gauges kept fritzing out, headliner falls out of the ceiling, sunvisor won't stay up, More rattles than the baby section of Toy-R-Us, yada yada yada.) Two Probes since then, both awesomely great cars. Good enough that they're the ONLY two cars I've had since 1990.
 
I also find it funny that you seem to think automatics offer no driving pleasure

I think that perhaps I have the privilege of having driven the fastest and most powerful car with an automatic gearbox of pretty much anybody on this site (though with 100,000 members I await correction - hence why I didn't just say "anybody").

I'm afraid that it only offers one pleasure when driving - it's slighty more agreeable in stop-start traffic. Call me unnecessarily pedantic, but commuting and queueing doesn't meet my definition of "driving".

Driving the car itself is hilarious. Looks like a lounge on the inside, weighs as much as a cathedral, handles like an Esprit, goes like an Exocet. It'd be a kersquillion times better if it had a manual gearbox. Nail me to the floor and creosote my nipples if I'm being odd here, but I quite like to change gears when I like to change gears and not, say, halfway round a corner at 110mph (on a race track) when I back off slightly.

The car offers up an awful lot of driving pleasure. The auto 'box takes some of it back again.
 
I think that perhaps I have the privilege of having driven the fastest and most powerful car with an automatic gearbox of pretty much anybody on this site (though with 100,000 members I await correction - hence why I didn't just say "anybody").

I can bid an S500 as the most powerful auto I've driven, out of interest what was yours?

Scaff
 
I can bid an S500 as the most powerful auto I've driven, out of interest what was yours?

Scaff

Honda or Mercedes? :D

I think I've got 100hp and 1.1s on the Merc... Jaguar S-Type R.

Edit: Tell a lie - the new S500 is a 5.5 litre V8 with 382hp. 8hp less, but ballpark.
 
Honda or Mercedes? :D

I think I've got 100hp and 1.1s on the Merc... Jaguar S-Type R.

S-Type R - 4.2 litre V8 / 400bhp / 399 ftlbs

S500 - 5.0 litre V8 / 383bhp / 391 ftlbs

I got you beat on engine size, but you certainly get the nod on bhp, torque and power to weight.

:)

Scaff
 
Basically, all the guys here stating their preference for manual have driven both, and learned both well enough to make a choice.

Bingo. I drove automatics for more than ten years. Now I drive stick. And I'll probably never drive another automatic for the rest of my days, given the choice.
 
Back