I just can't understand it, Indycar are turbo aswell yet sound much better.
so if this is the ps3/xbox version ? which looks just as good graphics as gt6, i presume the ps4 version will look even better. maybe codies have got their act together and made a game that looks realistic. i hope so !
Told ya it would get better, sounds better,looks better, listen as Hulkenberg flies past the stationary camera before heading up eau rouge, wicked.
Sounds good to me and I can't wait, graphics look improoved. Can't see the drama.
Because sound, like heat, is a form that energy can take. The emphasis of the 2014 generation of Formula 1 engines is on energy recovery - of taking energy that would otherwise be wasted, and using it more effectively and more efficiently. The scream of the older generation of engines was a result of this wasted energy. IndyCar does not have it, because their engines do not use ERS the way Formula 1 does.I just can't understand it, Indycar are turbo aswell yet sound much better.
They tried. It didn't work. In the test following the Spanish Grand Prix, Nico Rosberg carried an experimental "trumpet" fixture on his exhaust. It was supposed to amplify the engine noise, but Mercedes quickly discovered that any benefits were inaudible, and abandoned it.You would think though that they would do something to the exhaust note.
Onboard videos aren't a good comparison, unless you want the game to sound exactly like onboards. According to the developers, sound samples are taken at locations within the chassis and cockpit that represent what the drivers hear.
*Edit, found the referenced article...http://blog.codemasters.com/f1/10/paddock-pass-the-audio/
Sounds good to me and I can't wait, graphics look improoved. Can't see the drama.
Because sound, like heat, is a form that energy can take. The emphasis of the 2014 generation of Formula 1 engines is on energy recovery - of taking energy that would otherwise be wasted, and using it more effectively and more efficiently. The scream of the older generation of engines was a result of this wasted energy. IndyCar does not have it, because their engines do not use ERS the way Formula 1 does.
They tried. It didn't work. In the test following the Spanish Grand Prix, Nico Rosberg carried an experimental "trumpet" fixture on his exhaust. It was supposed to amplify the engine noise, but Mercedes quickly discovered that any benefits were inaudible, and abandoned it.
Besides, most people stopped caring about the noise some time around the Bahrain Grand Prix, when they realised that there could still be quality racing without the old engine note.
How, then, considering that the change in engine sound is a direct result of the thermal energy recovery system capturing the energy that would normally make the noise, and utilising it in a completely different way? It's not going to be "fixed" - not that it needs to be - by sticking a hot dog exhaust on the cars.IMO they could easily fix the note.
How, then, considering that the change in engine sound is a direct result of the thermal energy recovery system capturing the energy that would normally make the noise, and utilising it in a completely different way? It's not going to be "fixed" - not that it needs to be - by sticking a hot dog exhaust on the cars.
Or did you miss that day of Year 9 Science?
I see what you mean but IMO if it had that much influence on the sound, we wouldn't be able to hear air passing through the waste gate. Especially while downshifting
There was some disappointment among viewers after the first few races, but most people no longer care about the sound. It's the quality of the racing that people care about. You are quite literally the *only* person I know of who still objects to the sound, so I think it's a gross misrepresentation to claim that viewers still care about the sound.Yeah but does the sound worry them as much as it does to the viewers?