Failures of Motorsports - Car Designs, Team Mistakes and More

  • Thread starter Panoz
  • 546 comments
  • 112,641 views
CGI advertising

Formula One seems to have started this trend, projecting sponsor logos onto the circuit and run-off areas. They were eyesores, to say the least, but mercifully, the practice has largely been abandoned. V8 Supercars, however, took to the idea like a duck to water. Races now regularly have CGI banners set up around the circuit, but apparently they were created with a Sega Dreamcast because the graphics are so poorly done.
 
These two events are just the latest in a long list of disappointments or bad decisions that was been seen in motorsports. From bad car designs, to team or driver performance that lead to poor results and sanctioning bodies making new regulations that later destroyed a series is the point for this thread.


Pretty sure considering the money the network gets, the CGI was the TV channel's idea, not the series as a similar thing was happening (and still is happening) with Fox's NASCAR coverage. I'm also sure it doesn't fall under the part in bold.
 
CGI advertising

Formula One seems to have started this trend, projecting sponsor logos onto the circuit and run-off areas. They were eyesores, to say the least, but mercifully, the practice has largely been abandoned. V8 Supercars, however, took to the idea like a duck to water. Races now regularly have CGI banners set up around the circuit, but apparently they were created with a Sega Dreamcast because the graphics are so poorly done.
Let me guess. Its a standard practice on court sport like Badminton, Tennis, etc when players started their service hit on game.
 
It's something that cheapens the overall image of a series for the sake of a few extra dollars.

Personally I love the approach here:

srdWwLM-696x783.jpg


Yeah, let's project the ad orthographically, because spatial perception is so overrated.
 
CGI advertising

Formula One seems to have started this trend, projecting sponsor logos onto the circuit and run-off areas. They were eyesores, to say the least, but mercifully, the practice has largely been abandoned. V8 Supercars, however, took to the idea like a duck to water. Races now regularly have CGI banners set up around the circuit, but apparently they were created with a Sega Dreamcast because the graphics are so poorly done.

V8Supercars have been using them for a few years now, Bathurst 2013 was the first round that remember properly noticing them. Forza 5 was being advertised on these terrible looking fake structures. Looked shocking. It's not so bad now, they've smoothed it out a little, but it's still not great. They should just go back to have proper billboards and signage, I reckon it can give character to particular corners when they prominent signage.
 
Porsche's glorious return to Formula One with Footwork Arrows in 1991 with an overweight and underpowered lump of iron which only raced three or four times.

There was a great article on F1 Rejects before that website went down. I found an image of the horrible, heavy unit:

A 3.5L V12 which was 50lbs heavier than the 1991 Honda V12 and 100lbs heavier than the 1991 Ferrari V12.
Its power was also down; 670hp compared to Honda's 710hp, Ferrari's 710hp, Renault's 700hp. Even the debuting Ilmor engine made 680hp and was nowhere near as heavy.

1991-footwork-porsche.jpg


It was too big to fit into the planned 1991 car, the A12, so they had to refit the A11 again, a car which had debuted in 1989. It was guff. Then the A12 arrived and it was still guff. The engine was just utterly, utterly, utterly hopeless. It failed to finish any race and DNQed multiple times. After 6 races, Footwork Arrows had had enough and reverted to Cosworth DFRs. The four-year deal was cut short officially in October at the Japanese Grand Prix.

This time Porsche didn't have the TAG name to fall on in case it went wrong. It did go wrong and they looked silly for it.
 
That's almost a carbon copy of the Subaru engine of 1990s fate. Big manufacturer enters sport with new engine, engine is underpowered and heavy, fail to pre-qualify even once, pull out halfway through the season, hang head in shame.

At least Honda look to be getting somewhere now.
 
Jaguar Racing

Prior to the year 2000, Jaguar's only appearance in Formula One was courtesy of a unique entry at the 1950 Italian Grand Prix. Clemente Biondetti used a private Ferrari 166 chassis and put a Jaguar I6 in it for the only non-Ferrari engined Ferrari in F1 history:

2BC782F500000578-3215496-image-a-4_1441293032986.jpg


It's the #22 on the left.

Four decades later and cue Stewart Grand Prix. In the 1990s many new teams attempted to get to the grid and failed, or did get to the grid and ran out of money. With Jordan already a solid midfield team, Stewart Grand Prix entered in 1997 and did so well where DAMS, Honda, Lola, Simtek, Forti, DOME and Pacific did so badly. They had the money; from the Malaysian tourist board and HSBC. They had talent; from Rubens Barrichello. And they had the engines; thanks to Jackie Stewart's long-standing connections, an exclusive Ford deal.

The cars were always slick but it took three seasons to mate a reliable engine to a competent gearbox. And in a 1999 season where Frentzen and Irvine were challenging for the title, Barrichello was securing pole position and regular podiums for Stewart. Johnny Herbert even won at the Nürburgring.

Ford were suitably impressed that they extended their works deal into purchasing the team in its entirety. What was a semi-works Ford team on paper was now a full-works Ford team in reality. In order to promote their Premier Auto Group arm, the team was christened Jaguar Racing. As some of you may be aware, the 2000 Jaguar R1 recently took the GTP crown of best looking F1 car from the 2000s:

r1-jagu-2000-launch-1.jpg


So things were looking up. Inheriting a successful team on the up, designing a great looking car, accruing fans, and they even got championship runner-up Eddie Irvine to lead the team alongside racewinner Johnny Herbert.

But all was not as it seemed. In taking over the team, Ford decieded that they wanted their own people to run the team. So out went Jackie and Paul Stewart, out went Alan Jenkins and out went Gary Anderson. In came Wolfgang Reitzle, head of the PAG. He was not a motorsports man and did not have the mentality to be parachuted into a racing team and produce results.

2000 was not the season they had hoped for. Just 4 points compared to the 1999 Stewart's 36.

Reitzle knew his limitations and stepped down. Ford went one better and got a motorsports man to run the team; Bobby Rahal. The only problem here was that Rahal was a well-respected man in USAC and CART circles but F1 is a different kettle of fish. A first podium was secured in Monaco but performance was no better than 2000 and Niki Lauda was brought in as an 'advisor' to assist the team. Rahal felt his position was undermined and quit the team at the end of the season.

2001 saw 9 points and a token improvement on 2000.

f1-san-marino-gp-2001-bobby-rahal-and-niki-lauda.jpg


Two of motorsport's most recognisable men; but the partnership didn't last too long.

So Lauda was in sole charge for 2002. The slushfund from Ford kept coming and this promise of money was used to try and lure away Adrian Newey from McLaren. This ultimately did not succeed and the embarrassment from this incident, coupled with Lauda's brash management, led Ford to wield the axe; Lauda and a further 70 staff were made redundant, the money dried up and Ford's board of directors gave the team two years to start improving.

2002 saw 8 points and the same level of mid-midfield performance.

f1-italian-gp-2002-the-podium-race-winner-rubens-barrichello-with-michael-schumacher-and-e.jpg


Irvine quit at the end of 2002 but did deliver the only two podiums the team would get.

For 2003, John Hogan took stewardship of the team with a reduced budget. Hogan immediately saw about utilising the money as best he could, cutting costs wherever he could, including stopping using a windtunnel in California and using one closer to the team's factory in Milton Keynes. Yes, that's right, between 2000-2002 Jaguar was doing the majority of its windtunnel activities on the west coast of the United States. In a European, even British, dominated sport, this was absolute madness.

Hogan's more efficient use of resources lifted the team's performances and although no podiums were scored, 18 points was a significant improvement and more than double the previous year's total.

The team benefited significantly from the increase in points-paying positions to 8th and in 2004 team leader Mark Webber continued to score well as he did in 2003. 2004 was also the year Jaguar famously put a diamond stud on each car's nose at Monaco to promote the film Ocean's Twelve and Christian Klien's diamond mysteriously vanished after his lap one crash. Although they didn't score as many points as they did in 2003, Webber and Klien were bringing the cars home more often than not.

jaguar-f1-on-circuit.jpg


Mark Webber began dragging the Jaguar towards the upper third of the grid.

Had Jaguar finally turned a corner? Had the results given the team a stay of execution? Well, not according to the bosses in Detroit. Ford announced that the team was up for sale and 2004 was the last year for Jaguar Racing. The irony being that although performances had improved under smaller, more efficient budget, Ford were not 'feeling' that they were getting value for money on their return because the parent brand (Ford itself) was not featured prominently enough! A staggering excuse given that it was Ford who insisted on christening the team Jaguar to promote one arm of their company even though Jaguar Cars had 0% to do with the Formula One team.

So where did it go wrong for Jaguar?

- They initially brought in a lot of their own men some of whom had no prior motorsport experience
- They hired a CART manager to run an F1 team
- They poured money into an inefficient spending sink
- Their ambitions manoeuvres such as poaching Newey didn't work
- They hired sub-par number twos such as Luciano Burti, Antonio Pizzonia and Christian Klien
- They sold the team when things actually started to look on the up even on a small budget
- They excused themselves by saying that the "Ford brand" wasn't featured prominently

Red Bull purchased the team on the final day it was up for sale (September 2004) and Milton Keynes Grand Prix's next name became Red Bull Racing in time for 2005. The team did as well as Jaguar were improving towards, if not a little stagnant around 2007-08, before they promoted Sebastian Vettel and Adrian Newey found a second wind in car design. The rest, as you know, is history.

Coulthard_RedBull_Canada2005.jpg


What could have been the Jaguar R6 became the Red Bull RB1.
 
Last edited:
Jaguar Racing

Prior to the year 2000, Jaguar's only appearance in Formula One was courtesy of a unique entry at the 1950 Italian Grand Prix. Clemente Biondetti used a private Ferrari 166 chassis and put a Jaguar I6 in it for the only non-Ferrari engined Ferrari in F1 history:

2BC782F500000578-3215496-image-a-4_1441293032986.jpg


It's the #22 on the left.

Four decades later and cue Stewart Grand Prix. In the 1990s many new teams attempted to get to the grid and failed, or did get to the grid and ran out of money. With Jordan already a solid midfield team, Stewart Grand Prix entered in 1997 and did so well where DAMS, Honda, Lola, Simtek, Forti, DOME and Pacific did so badly. They had the money; from the Malaysian tourist board and HSBC. They had talent; from Rubens Barrichello. And they had the engines; thanks to Jackie Stewart's long-standing connections, an exclusive Ford deal.

The cars were always slick but it took three seasons to mate a reliable engine to a competent gearbox. And in a 1999 season where Frentzen and Irvine were challenging for the title, Barrichello was securing pole position and regular podiums for Stewart. Johnny Herbert even won at the Nürburgring.

Ford were suitably impressed that they extended their works deal into purchasing the team in its entirety. What was a semi-works Ford team on paper was now a full-works Ford team in reality. In order to promote their Premier Auto Group arm, the team was christened Jaguar Racing. As some of you may be aware, the 2000 Jaguar R1 recently took the GTP crown of best looking F1 car from the 2000s:

r1-jagu-2000-launch-1.jpg


So things were looking up. Inheriting a successful team on the up, designing a great looking car, accruing fans, and they even got championship runner-up Eddie Irvine to lead the team alongside racewinner Johnny Herbert.

But all was not as it seemed. In taking over the team, Ford decieded that they wanted their own people to run the team. So out went Jackie and Paul Stewart, out went Alan Jenkins and out went Gary Anderson. In came Wolfgang Reitzle, head of the PAG. He was not a motorsports man and did not have the mentality to be parachuted into a racing team and produce results.

2000 was not the season they had hoped for. Just 4 points compared to the 1999 Stewart's 36.

Reitzle knew his limitations and stepped down. Ford went one better and got a motorsports man to run the team; Bobby Rahal. The only problem here was that Rahal was a well-respected man in USAC and CART circles but F1 is a different kettle of fish. A first podium was secured in Monaco but performance was no better than 2000 and Niki Lauda was brought in as an 'advisor' to assist the team. Rahal felt his position was undermined and quit the team at the end of the season.

2001 saw 9 points and a token improvement on 2000.

laudarahal1-lg.jpg


Two of motorsport's most recognisable men; but the partnership didn't last too long.

So Lauda was in sole charge for 2002. The slushfund from Ford kept coming and this promise of money was used to try and lure away Adrian Newey from McLaren. This ultimately did not succeed and the embarrassment from this incident, coupled with Lauda's brash management, led Ford to wield the axe; Lauda and a further 70 staff were made redundant, the money dried up and Ford's board of directors gave the team two years to start improving.

2002 saw 8 points and the same level of mid-midfield performance.

f1-italian-gp-2002-the-podium-race-winner-rubens-barrichello-with-michael-schumacher-and-e.jpg


Irvine quit at the end of 2002 but did deliver the only two podiums the team would get.

For 2003, John Hogan took stewardship of the team with a reduced budget. Hogan immediately saw about utilising the money as best he could, cutting costs wherever he could, including stopping using a windtunnel in California and using one closer to the team's factory in Milton Keynes. Yes, that's right, between 2000-2002 Jaguar was doing the majority of its windtunnel activities on the west coast of the United States. In a European, even British, dominated sport, this was absolute madness.

Hogan's more efficient use of resources lifted the team's performances and although no podiums were scored, 18 points was a significant improvement and more than double the previous year's total.

The team benefited significantly from the increase in points-paying positions to 8th and in 2004 team leader Mark Webber continued to score well as he did in 2003. 2004 was also the year Jaguar famously put a diamond stud on each car's nose at Monaco to promote the film Ocean's Twelve and Christian Klien's diamond mysteriously vanished after his lap one crash. Although they didn't score as many points as they did in 2003, Webber and Klien were bringing the cars home more often than not.

jaguar-f1-on-circuit.jpg


Mark Webber began dragging the Jaguar towards the upper third of the grid.

Had Jaguar finally turned a corner? Had the results given the team a stay of execution? Well, not according to the bosses in Detroit. Ford announced that the team was up for sale and 2004 was the last year for Jaguar Racing. The irony being that although performances had improved under smaller, more efficient budget, Ford were not 'feeling' that they were getting value for money on their return because the parent brand (Ford itself) was not featured prominently enough! A staggering excuse given that it was Ford who insisted on christening the team Jaguar to promote one arm of their company even though Jaguar Cars had 0% to do with the Formula One team.

So where did it go wrong for Jaguar?

- They initially brought in a lot of their own men some of whom had no prior motorsport experience
- They hired a CART manager to run an F1 team
- They poured money into an inefficient spending sink
- Their ambitions manoeuvres such as poaching Newey didn't work
- They hired sub-par number twos such as Luciano Burti, Antonio Pizzonia and Christian Klien
- They sold the team when things actually started to look on the up even on a small budget
- They excused themselves by saying that the "Ford brand" wasn't featured prominently

Red Bull purchased the team on the final day it was up for sale (September 2004) and Milton Keynes Grand Prix's next name became Red Bull Racing in time for 2005. The team did as well as Jaguar were improving towards, if not a little stagnant around 2007-08, before they promoted Sebastian Vettel and Adrian Newey found a second wind in car design. The rest, as you know, is history.

Coulthard_RedBull_Canada2005.jpg


What could have been the Jaguar R6 became the Red Bull RB1.

Purchased for $1 USD from what I've heard, best dollar ever spent,
 
CGI advertising

Formula One seems to have started this trend, projecting sponsor logos onto the circuit and run-off areas. They were eyesores, to say the least, but mercifully, the practice has largely been abandoned. V8 Supercars, however, took to the idea like a duck to water. Races now regularly have CGI banners set up around the circuit, but apparently they were created with a Sega Dreamcast because the graphics are so poorly done.
It's been in the V8 supercar series since the 90s from memory, Bathurst was always filled with it.

Im not soo much against it, but when it looks poorly done then I understand the complaint.
 
That's true. A symbolic fee of US$1 under the assurance of $400 million worth of investment.
And they certainly got the investment they wanted. :lol: Bet they didn't think they would become a top team 5 years after selling it.
 
Peugeot In The Supertouring BTCC

6032770031_5dab59b14b_b.jpg


Some people might not know it but Peugeot first entered the BTCC during the Group A era. A younger Mike Jordan drove the Peugeot 309 in the often forgotten Class C (1601cc-2000cc). The only other 'competition' in that class was the previously dominant Volkswagen Golf and the occasional Honda Prelude. Peugeot entered in 1989 but was completely put aside by the Vauxhall Astra of John Cleland, which also debuted and went on to win the title that year.

There was no Peugeot entry during the transitional 1990 season.

1991 was the true start of the supertouring era. Privateer teams were not gone but teams such as Rouse Sport, Vic Lee Motorsport, Dave Cook Racing, Janspeed and Prodrive were instead running teams on behalf of manufacturers like Toyota, BMW, Vauxhall and Nissan, who became background underwriters to these now-serious factory efforts.

Peugeot declined to enter a factory team in 1991 but saw the potential of a serious entry into a series which would become the continent's best.

The new team for 1992 would be run by Mick Linford's motorsport outfit. Linford was responsible for all Peugeot Sport UK activity; British Touring Car Championship, the British Rally Championship and the one-make Peugeot Rally Cup. The tin-top team would use the hot model Peugeot 405 Mi16, a car with good exposure and notoriety in the UK thanks to a "controversial" advert when it was launched in 1988.

The one-car effort was piloted by Robb Gravett, a top driver who could have gotten a decent drive at any other team; he was the 1990 champion and happy to get away from Ford after the Trackstar team went bankrupt due to a lack of funding. The 1991 Ford Sierra Sapphire was a failure worthy of its own article in this thread.

8430364200_5fdb29895f.jpg

Gravett spins out at Snetterton

In a trying season, the team struggled to make the points with Gravett finishing in the points only twice. But this toe dip into the water would lead to a full, two-car assault for the 1993 season. Gravett was partnered by Eugene O'Brien and there was even a third Peugeot 405 for Ian Flux in a very background "semi-works" effort.

1993 was a better season for Peugeot; they made leaps and bounds against the other manufacturers similarly lacking in experience; Rover and Mitsubishi disappeared without a trace whereas Peugeot was competing with Nissan and Mazda in a "best of the rest" behind the big three of Vauxhall, Toyota and BMW. Gravett scored 34 points in this season compared to just 2 points the prior year, O'Brien scored 23 and Flux scored 14. Peugeot finished 6th in the manufacturers championship, just behind Nissan but ahead of both Renault and Mazda.

In 1994 Gravett left and was replaced by Patrick Watts, who had shown flashes of brilliance at Mazda and put in many strong drives throughout the year which included 4 podium finishes, good enough for 8th in the championship, Peugeot's best showing yet. Peugeot remained 6th in the manufacturers championship but the increasing number of manufacturers, it would only increase as the seasons went on, meant that the midfield battle was fast becoming a race of attrition and a panic scramble for the minor points.

60b95d9200a79de7698c5aef64f022a2.jpg

Watts' four 3rd places ensured Peugeot were in touch with "the best of the rest"

1995 was the last year for the venerable 405 and the midfield battle became much more intense with Alfa Romeo, BMW and Toyota all slipping further and further behind, dropping into Peugeot's realm and the debuting Honda offering even more competition. Peugeot finished bottom of the manufacturer's championship and Watts just about held on to a top 10 championship position ahead of David Leslie on countback.

PatrickWatts.jpg

Patrick Watts

At this point, it is worth pointing out that although I described the 405 as "venerable" in the British series, this belies its success elsewhere; in Italy Fabrizio Giovanardi and Gary Ayles were regular race winners and podium gatherers with Giovanardi finishing 2nd (1994) and 3rd (1995) in the Superturismo Championship; in France Laurent Aiello won the 1994 French Touring Car Championship and was 3rd in 1995. Yet in Britain, in the series which was arguably seen and touted as "the best", Peugeot was struggling.

1996 brought a new car, new colours and new sponsors. Out went the 405 and in came the sleek 406, another car which gained a following thanks to a memorable advert on British TV (this is the full, three-minute version; shorter ones were used more frequently). Out went Anglo-Dutch Shell and in came French Total to supply oil and lubricants. Out went the haphazard liveries and in came a much nicer, more striking red affair with blue and white trim.

Tim_Harvey_BTCC_1996.jpg


Also new for 1996 was Tim Harvery, signed to partner Patrick Watts. Harvey was well known at this time as a brilliant development driver, able to help struggling teams move up the field. He had done it with BMW in 1991, culminating in them winning the title together in 1992; he did it with Renault, driving for them in 1993 and 1994, winning races and proving the Laguna to be the car it would go on to be; he did it with Volvo, driving for them in 1995, leading the championship early on and going some way to enabling TWR to become a top touring car team once again in a very competitive season with Rickard Rydell. Given that he had done so with three other manufacturers who had reaped the benefits, there was no reason why he couldn't do it with Peugeot. It seemed the Total package (pun definitely intended).

But 1996 was a disaster. Harvey finished 4th at Snetterton but that aside neither driver finished better than 8th and Harvey's 20 points and Watts' 6 points was a pauper's challenge on the championship. Harvey and Watts both struggled to get the best out of the new car; Tim Harvey set the ignominious record of 6 consecutive DNFs, which I believe is still a BTCC record, and Patrick Watts actually had 10 consecutive non-classified finishes; 4 DNFs, then a DNS, another DNF, then another DNS, and then 4 more DNFs.

In 1997 MSD (Motorsport Developments) came in to run the team but Mick Linford was still team manager as head of Peugeot Sport UK. And with this came arguably the Peugeot BTCC contender most people remember:

6581260153_24b3777fe7_b.jpg

Note: This is the 1998 car but it's the best quality picture of this machine

The green and gold Esso Ultron Peugeot. Unquestionably one of the best looking BTCC supertourers but looks don't always mean success and 1997, although an unquestionable improvement on 1996, was another struggle against the more successful, better funded teams. Watts was the last-placed works driver in the championship with a 26 point haul which coincidentally was the sum total the team achieved last year. Harvey did have a much better season, 66 points good enough for 9th in the championship and the first time since 1994 that a Peugeot driver had finished in the single digits of championship placings.

Whilst Alain Menu crushed the opposition and dominated the championship, a rare bright spark for Peugeot is that drive of the season is quite possibly the one Tim Harvey gave at Thruxton. Rain fell, and Harvey pitted for wet weather tyres behind the safety car. He found himself way down the field in 17th position but Harvey, a noted wet weather specialist, danced around the notoriously tricky circuit with such ease and guile that he was anywhere between 3-5 seconds faster than anyone else on the track. He simply marched through the field, overtaking the cautious and lapping those who span off. When it came down to it, he finished less than a second behind race winner Gabriele Tarquini and had the race been one, maybe two laps longer, he would have unquestionably won the race. It's a fantastic race and well worth a watch.

mar-1997-a-portrait-of-tim-harvey-of-esso-ultron-team-peugeot-406-at-picture-id1913895

Harvey's wet-weather exploits were a true highlight of the 1997 season

Elsewhere? Laurent Aiello won the 1997 German Supertourenwagen Championship in a Peugeot 406. Once again, the British challenge was the lesser funded, worse performing of Peugeot's porfolio.

1998 would be Peugeot's final year. Tim Harvey was joined by Paul Radisich and the green & gold continued to win over fans but Peugeot's budget was not enough and the car was simply not competitive enough. Radisich was the more competitive of the two, finishing 4th at Silverstone, 6th at Knockhill and again at Silverstone, and even briefly led at Oulton Park thanks to pit stops, but both drivers finished even behind some of the independents in the driver's championship.

Peugeot was once again last in the manufacturer's championship and along with Audi, declined to submit an entry for 1999 due to a lack of competitiveness and costs spiralling out of control.

So what went wrong? And why?

Finance. Despite a dedicated, hard-working crew Peugeot never had the budget that any of the top teams like Williams Renault, TWR, AC Schnitzer or Alfa Corse had for their factory exploits. This didn't affect just Peugeot as shown that in 2000 there were only three teams left and a car cost around £1,000,000 a year to race but those costs increased as the seasons went on and Peugeot headquarters never stumped up that kind of cash.

But there is a caveat to that. As mentioned, Peugeot was far more competitive in other series than it was in Britain, both with the 405 and 406. Rumour has it that the British Peugeots ran a different aerodynamic package than their continental cousins and this hampered them significantly for the entire seven-season tenure Peugeot had in the BTCC. Ostensibly Peugeot Sport HQ apparently did not want whoever was running the British outfit to have knowledge of their advanced 405 and 406 packages, lest they quit running the team and take that information to other BTCC rivals.

This seems extremely unusual given that it was in Peugeot's best interests to succeed in the BTCC and to hamper their own effort is illogical but whereas the BTCC outfit was run by MSD and other 'external' personnel, the French, German and Italian teams were run under the more direct control of Peugeot Talbot.

The evolution of what a touring car team was changed during their tenure; of those teams I mentioned at the start in 1991/92, Janspeed, DC Racing, VLM, Rousesport, not one of them lasted as works teams by the end of the decade. Prodrive left in 1992 and came back later on but the 'old guard' touring car teams were gradually supplanted by better-funded teams with experience from F1 like Williams or TWR and budgets to poach top international stars such as Gabriele Tarquini, Frank Biela, Jo Winkelhock and Laurent Aiello. Peugeot lost ground to those teams, couldn't hire those drivers and quite simply could not keep up.

You will also notice that I have failed to mention any wins for Peugeot in the BTCC. This is the crux of this article; despite being extremely well remembered for their presentable cars and named talents like Radisich, Harvey and Gravett, Peugeot remain the only full-fledged, two-car works team to not win a race during the supertouring era.

A failure, yes, but unlike a lot of the other things I have written about for this thread, this failure is at least a popularly-remembered underdog.
 
Another BTCC ditty but this one isn't a failure per se, more of a driver mistake.

The Guaranteed Title I Threw Away: Anthony Reid & The 1999 BTCC

anthony-reid-it-was-the-zenith.jpg

1998; one of the BTCC's best ever seasons

1998 was a great year for Anthony Reid. After a difficult 1997 in the all-new RML Primera, 1998 was the season Nissan ascended to the front of the grid in quite possibly the shortest period of time imaginable. To put it another way, for the gamers out there, Anthony Reid went from having his AI hardcoded to finishing outside of the points in 1997's TOCA Touring Car Championship to winning the race more than 50% of the time in 1998's Toca 2 Touring Cars.

Reid won seven times that year after struggling in the lower midfield the year before. By a thirdway through the season, the Nissan was the car to beat and arguably Reid could have won the title this year had he picked up some more points in the first six rounds when the car was not yet quite as competitive. He 'lost' the title in circumstances of his own making; needing to finish better than Rickard Rydell in the final two rounds, he collided with James Thompson on lap one in the sprint race instead of biding his time.

1998.png


But Nissan were unquestionably the team to beat in the coming 1999 season and it was merely a matter of by how many points they were going to win.

Here is Reid driving that year:

501578.jpg


Reid unexpectedly moved to Ford in the close season. Nissan hired Laurent Aiello to replace him and Aiello cruised to the title in his one and only BTCC season, ahead of David Leslie in the second Nissan; Aiello on 244pts, Leslie on 228pts and Rydell, a distant third, on 192pts. Reid was well down in 12th, just behind teammate Alain Menu, on 78 and 84 points respectively.

Nissan scored 464 points in the manufacturers championship, far ahead of Honda's 296 points in 2nd, and well ahead of last place Ford's 164 points. 300 more points were scored by Nissan.

1999.png


1999.png


So why had Reid left Nissan and all-but abdicated his right to a BTCC crown? Money. Reid admitted as much in a reflective interview a few years ago and was pragmatic about it;

I knew Nissan had the best car for 1999 but Ford offered me so much money on a two-year deal I just couldn't say no. Nissan were already pulling out at the end of 1999 so the security of a two-year deal on more money was too good to ignore.
Note: this is a paraphrase from his interview with Autosport for their supertouring special retrospective issue.

That money was roughly in the £750,000 a year region. Alan Gow, BTCC series director, once stated that the highest a driver earnt in the supertouring era was £800,000 a year by the year 2000 which would have undoubtedly gone to ex-champions Rydell and Menu. As the third Ford driver, Reid wouldn't have been too far behind in those stakes.

And in that year 2000, Ford was the car to beat but with two former champions as teammates, Reid did not have the number one status he previously had at Nissan and lost the title at the final round once again due to a retirement but crucially this time it was ultimately on dropped scores.

2000.png


So twice in three seasons Anthony Reid was runner-up in the championship having faltered at the final hurdle. Sandwiched in between those two years, he finished outside the top 10 whilst the car he had left dominated the championship. It could have been so different.
 
Last edited:
Not sure a failure to qualify is quite of the order of merit that this thread normally requires.

Anyway, Bob Fernley now has plenty of time to tend his beds.
I'd say it counts. Mclaren coming into the race and Alonso wanting to complete the Triple Crown. On the night before the Last Row Shootout, they went to Penske and were able to get a setup sheet and went to Andretti to get shocks yet were still bumped.

And especially with the disasters highlighted in this article. https://apnews.com/a8653967a9714ac7a9a3ba576f712fff
 
Last edited:
I'd say it counts. Mclaren coming into the race and Alonso wanting to complete the Triple Crown. On the night before the Last Row Shootout, they went to Penske and were able to get a setup sheet and went to Andretti to get shocks yet were still bumped.

And especially with the disasters highlighted in this article. https://apnews.com/a8653967a9714ac7a9a3ba576f712fff

Agreed, I retract my earlier comment. What a ****-show. Spare car the wrong colour, missing steering wheel, failure to correctly convert the US measurements on the stup, utterly incredible.
 
Has that interview actually been cited? There's a lot of straw grasping in it that doesn't make logical sense, even for a failed attempt. You don't really get a conversion between measurement systems "kind of" wrong- the differences would be marginal, unless they straight up divided instead of multiplied or something: and in that case the settings would've been RADICALLY different.

The article also spent five minutes explaining the short comings on their car to then go around and say that it was caused by the gearing being only set for 227.5mph... somehow. If that was all that was preventing it, how did a multitude of other teams with Indy experience make the same cock up? Yeah, I'm not buying it.
 
When they say that the unit conversion was wrong, I expect that it means no conversion was done at all.
For example if the ride height in the setup tgey got was 10, they would have set it at 10cm instead of the intended ~25cm (10in).
 
When they say that the unit conversion was wrong, I expect that it means no conversion was done at all.
For example if the ride height in the setup tgey got was 10, they would have set it at 10cm instead of the intended ~25cm (10in).

Unless the setup was somehow scribbled on a napkin, a proper setup sheet should have a form of a measurement - plus the car would've been radically dofferent to any other (which would be odd if it's borrowing a setup).
 
Amazing but Mclaren should have just partnered with a top team. They're only in it for the 500, why even do it this way. Alonso did great with an Andretti car last time.
 
What I said in the Indycar thread has relevance here:
Thinking about bump day now, Carlin in general had a horrible Indy 500 bump day. Of the 4 cars that they supported (O'Ward, Chilton, Kimball, Alonso via alliance with McLaren), the only one to make the show was Kimball.
 
Agreed, I retract my earlier comment. What a ****-show. Spare car the wrong colour, missing steering wheel, failure to correctly convert the US measurements on the stup, utterly incredible.
I think the most incredible part was this bit:
What’s next is a careful lookback as Brown figures out McLaren’s future at both the Indy 500 and the IndyCar Series. He still wants to field two full-time entries in the series but isn’t sure yet how much of a setback this has been. He believes McLaren will be back next year at Indy for a second chance.
After a debacle of this magnitude I would be surprised if they even bothered to show up for Indy next year, forget about a full two car campaign. There's clearly fundamental issues that need to be sorted if the head man on a team this big has to scrounge up the car's steering wheel on short notice.
 
The part about the McLaren debacle that confuses me the most is why did they wait so long to seek outside help? It was apparent from the first full-field practice session that they were not where they needed to be, so why would you wait until the last second? Had they done the common sense thing and went to Andretti or some other team earlier in the week they probably would have easily made the field.
 
The part about the McLaren debacle that confuses me the most is why did they wait so long to seek outside help? It was apparent from the first full-field practice session that they were not where they needed to be, so why would you wait until the last second? Had they done the common sense thing and went to Andretti or some other team earlier in the week they probably would have easily made the field.
From the gist of the article it seems like a combination of small logistical issues all hitting at the same time when they would be trivial had they come one by one, their choice of partner either being unable or uninterested in giving them proper support, and presumably the higher-ups assuming things would just get sorted and it didn't need direct attention.

So really the failure was at all levels, not just because of one isolated incident.
 
The part about the McLaren debacle that confuses me the most is why did they wait so long to seek outside help? It was apparent from the first full-field practice session that they were not where they needed to be, so why would you wait until the last second? Had they done the common sense thing and went to Andretti or some other team earlier in the week they probably would have easily made the field.

Arrogance?
 
Back