Failures of Motorsports - Car Designs, Team Mistakes and More

  • Thread starter Panoz
  • 546 comments
  • 112,641 views
So really the failure was at all levels, not just because of one isolated incident.

Of course, but had they caved sooner they wouldn't have had to spend so much time trying to get the car to a point where Alonso could comfortably handle it and could have devoted more to fixing their other :censored:ups. They showed the on-board during Alonso's Sunday run and his steering wheel was considerably more stable compared to how it had been before. It would have been interesting to see what kind of gains they could have made if they were actually able to practice with a proper setup.

Arrogance?

Certainly seems like it.

Of course one mystery we will never know the answer to, is how bad would their pit stops have been had they made the race? (I'm picturing 3 Stooges meets Mr. Bean) :scared:
 
When they say that the unit conversion was wrong, I expect that it means no conversion was done at all.
For example if the ride height in the setup tgey got was 10, they would have set it at 10cm instead of the intended ~25cm (10in).
Yeah. Which explains the sparking they had in the Last Row Shootout practice earlier that day.
 
...combination of small logistical issues all hitting at the same time ...choice of partner either being unable or uninterested in giving them proper support...higher-ups assuming things would just get sorted and it didn't need direct attention.

So really the failure was at all levels, not just because of one isolated incident.

That pretty much defines systemic failure.
 
In 1960, a talented, well-funded American team exceptionally successful in sports cars assaulted Formula One with a car and engine they had built themselves. While technically it could have been competitive in 1958 when the project began, by 1960 it was facing the completed rear engine revolution and was uncompetitive.









Warren Olson, Lance Reventlow, Chuck Daigh
 
The Decline & Demise Of Benetton Formula

imgbin-benetton-formula-italian-grand-prix-1993-formula-one-world-championship-mclaren-logo-mclaren-EjPaVqCC2qb9NvaCTNWZyYZt1.jpg


Since entering Formula One in 1983, Benetton was company with ambition. Their first foray into the sport was sponsoring the Tyrrell team in 1983. In the face of the impending turbo revolution, the combination managed to win the 1983 Detroit Grand Prix with Michele Alboreto in what would be the last wins for both Tyrrell and the Cosworth DFV. Benetton turned its attention to the ailing Alfa Romeo team in 1984 as Benetton's interest in the sport became serious; they were looking to invest in a team outright. Alfa Romeo decided to withdraw at the end of the 1985 season so Benetton first sponsored and latterly purchased the Toleman team. Although there were no points, Teo Fabi did qualify in pole position for the 1985 German Grand Prix and was retained for the all-new Benetton Formula in 1986. He would be partnered by Gerhard Berger and the team secured works BMW power; the most powerful Formula One engine ever created.

Gerhard_Berger_1986_Detroit.jpg

Gerhard Berger was a revelation for the new team.

By 1990 the team had displaced both Lotus and Brabham in becoming a member of the "big four" which at that time consisted of Williams, McLaren, Ferrari and Benetton. With triple world champion Nelson Piquet and Roberto Moreno they were fighting for wins and regularly contesting podiums and a healthy 78 point haul saw them 3rd in the constructor's championship.

98wtjrw6bo121.jpg

The 1990 Japanese Grand Prix was the team's first 1-2 and consolidated their position as a top team.

By 1995 the first Schumacher era was underway. Michael Schumacher won the 1994 driver's championship in a season of controversy but Benetton clearly had the superior car irrespective of the cheating allegations and the superior driver; this was a time where Senna had died, Prost had retired, Piquet had retired and Mansell was all-but retired. With Benetton-Renault power the team won the 1995 double of driver's and constructor's championship. They were a team on top of the world and that is exactly where things start to unravel.

open-uri20121025-20564-q6tteu.jpg

Schumacher's superiority propelled Benetton to the top of the standings. It wasn't to last very long.

For 1996 Benetton lost Michael Schumacher but gained arguably the most complete two-driver line-up on the grid at that time in Gerhard Berger and Jean Alesi; a perfect mixture of name talent and front-running experience. However the 1996 season was a major step back and despite 10 podiums, 8 for Alesi and 2 for Berger, the defending constructor's champions failed to win a race and finished some way off the all-conquering Williams. It was Benetton's first dry season since 1988 and both drivers visibly struggled with their car at various points in the season.

The problems were two-fold; they lost a lot of their long-time pit crew that Schumacher demanded came with him and the first of much internal team strife began to surface.

Schumacher took chief designer Rory Byrne and technical director Ross Brawn with him to Ferrari and the B196, a direct development of the B195 that had been tailored to Schumacher's driving style, was difficult for Berger and Alesi to drive with the team unable to make any radical changes at the wrong time in the development cycle.

1996 was also the year that team manager Flavio Briatore and chief engineer Tom Walkinshaw fell out. Walkinshaw had worked for Benetton since 1991 and had purchased a 50% stake in the Ligier team, using this leverage to secure Ligier's Renault engines for Benetton and use Ligier as a very in-the-shadows junior team. Walkinshaw was unable to purchase the Ligier team outright and this resulted in him selling his Ligier shares as well as leaving Benetton entirely. The Benetton family became more interested in a direct role in the team now that they were successful and changed the team's licence and identity to that of an Italian team and in the aftermath of the Walkinshaw ousting appointed several Benetton family members to positions within Benetton Formula.

f1-australian-gp-1994-world-champion-michael-schumacher-celebrates-the-benetton-team-tom-w.jpg

Walkinshaw, Schumacher and Briatore before the big upheaval.

1997 brought more turmoil to the team. Briatore was dismissed by the Benetton family in early 1997 and replaced by Rocco Benetton as team principal and David Richards as chief executive. Renault had been privatised by the French government and announced their almost immediate withdrawal from Formula One at the end of the year.

On track, Alesi's relationship with Briatore evaporated at the very first Grand Prix when he ignored instructions to pit and ran out of fuel whilst in 3rd place. Berger on the other had did win a race, the German Grand Prix, but motivation, health issues and personal bereavements led to his retirement from the sport. This left Benetton without an engine deal, an inexperienced team principal and in Giancarlo Fisichella and Alexander Wurz, two inexperienced drivers for 1998.

benetton-4.jpg

1997 was the last year of the popular Berger & Alesi double act, which had begun at Ferrari in 1993.

In a superb twist of fate Benetton maintained use of customer Renault engines after Mecachrome, the company that manufactured the engines on Renault's behalf, sold its distribution rights to Supertec, a company owned by? Who else, but Flavio Briatore!

briatore_pic_001.jpg

Briatore, pictured with Luciano Benetton, had left the team but still controlled their engine contracts.

The team had to suffer using the Supertec units (badged as Playlife, a Benetton brand) for the next three seasons and this was almost certainly the death-knell that cost the team their place at the top. At a time where Jordan and BAR were courting Honda and Williams were romancing BMW, Benetton refused to work with a major engine manufacturer and Richards' disagreements with Luciano Benetton over a deal with Ford led to Richards' dismissal after just 12 months in the role. Rocco Benetton was in sole charge of the Formula One team at the tender age of 29.

Fisichella and Wurz tried their best but Benetton was left behind in the new era of changed regulations and more competitive midfield teams. Using 1997-spec engines in the year 2000 was something you would expect of Minardi, not a team which boasted a constructor's title under its belt within the past 5 years. Jordan, Stewart and Sauber were a far cry from the Osellas, Larrousses or Scuderia Italias they had competed with earlier.

At the halfway point of 1998 Benetton had 32 points but would score just one after that. From scoring a total of 135 points across 1996-97, Benetton scored just 36 points over 1999-00.

86n9o5x.jpg

Benetton's attempts to remain in the upper third of the grid didn't quite fit the gap.

By 2001 the slump in performance, reduction in funding and chronic use of under-powered engines reached its nadir. The Benetton B201 was a woefully slow machine, hampered by a 111° angle V10 that did not bring the promise in aerodynamics it supposedly offered (as a comparison every other team was using a 90° angle in their engines), and the team was struggling to out-qualify Minardi. In fact, at the 2001 San Marino Grand Prix, the two Benettons of Giancarlo Fisichella and Jenson Button qualified 19th and 21st behind the Minardi of a young Fernando Alonso.

Blushes were spared by an extremely fortuitous 4th and 5th double points finish at the race of attrition German Grand Prix and Fisichella put in an outstanding drive at the next Grand Prix in Belgium to finish 3rd. But make no mistake, Benetton had fallen and fallen hard all the way to the last two rows of the grid.

open-uri20120928-2803-s750rg.jpg

A familiar sight by 2001; one Benetton in the midfield way off the points and another at the back way off the points.

Three years is a long time in the automotive world and Renault announced that it was returning to Formula One in late 2000 and did so in the same manner as Benetton had first entered. That irony being in purchasing a team floundering near the back of the grid. Things had hit Benetton so hard that Renault reported at the time, "the team will not race under the Renault name until it is ready to win and reap the marketing benefits."

It would be remiss to exclude on Benetton's misfortune. During this 1996-01 downturn there were some moments where cruel luck took victory and success away from Benetton:

- Alesi was comfortably leading the 1996 Monaco Grand Prix until his suspension failed

- Berger dominated the 1996 German Grand Prix until a very rare Renault engine failure robbed him of certain victory; fortunately he made no mistake in 1997 and took his and the team's final win

- Fisichella was challenging for the lead at the 1998 Canadian Grand Prix when gearbox issues held him back

- Fisichella again challenged for victory at the 1998 Austrian Grand Prix by qualifying on pole. He was on course for a good result until a clash with Jean Alesi took him out of the race

- Fisichella inherited the lead of the rain-soaked 1999 European Grand Prix and would have been on course for a victory when he slid off in the tricky conditions

2001 was the last season for Benetton Formula and in just six short years had gone from driver's and constructor's double world champions to backmarkers being sold off. It was one of the quickest falls from grace in Formula One history. A key component is that Benetton's early success came from building the team around a particular driver. They are one of the progenitors of the current trend in Formula One to have a one-driver team and after the Piquet-era and Schumacher-era drew to a close, Benetton never recaptured that momentum and placating two similarly-talented drivers in failing machinery simply never worked for them.

1920px-Button_Silverstone_2002.jpg

Benetton became Renault in 2002 and the rest, as they say, is history.
 
Last edited:
The Decline & Demise Of Benetton Formula

imgbin-benetton-formula-italian-grand-prix-1993-formula-one-world-championship-mclaren-logo-mclaren-EjPaVqCC2qb9NvaCTNWZyYZt1.jpg


Since entering Formula One in 1983, Benetton was company with ambition. Their first foray into the sport was sponsoring the Tyrrell team in 1983. In the face of the impending turbo revolution, the combination managed to win the 1983 Detroit Grand Prix with Michele Alboreto in what would be the last wins for both Tyrrell and the Cosworth DFV. Benetton turned its attention to the ailing Alfa Romeo team in 1984 as Benetton's interest in the sport became serious; they were looking to invest in a team outright. Alfa Romeo decided to withdraw at the end of the 1985 season so Benetton first sponsored and latterly purchased the Toleman team. Although there were no points, Teo Fabi did qualify in pole position for the 1985 German Grand Prix and was retained for the all-new Benetton Formula in 1986. He would be partnered by Gerhard Berger and the team secured works BMW power; the most powerful Formula One engine ever created.

Gerhard_Berger_1986_Detroit.jpg

Gerhard Berger was a revelation for the new team.

By 1990 the team had displaced both Lotus and Brabham in becoming a member of the "big four" which at that time consisted of Williams, McLaren, Ferrari and Benetton. With triple world champion Nelson Piquet and Roberto Moreno they were fighting for wins and regularly contesting podiums and a healthy 78 point haul saw them 3rd in the constructor's championship.



98wtjrw6bo121.jpg

The 1990 Japanese Grand Prix was the team's first 1-2 and consolidated their position as a top team.

By 1995 the first Schumacher era was underway. Michael Schumacher won the 1994 driver's championship in a season of controversy but Benetton clearly had the superior car irrespective of the cheating allegations and the superior driver; this was a time where Senna had died, Prost had retired, Piquet had retired and Mansell was all-but retired. With Benetton-Renault power the team won the 1995 double of driver's and constructor's championship. They were a team on top of the world and that is exactly where things start to unravel.

open-uri20121025-20564-q6tteu.jpg

Schumacher's superiority propelled Benetton to the top of the standings. It wasn't to last very long.

For 1996 Benetton lost Michael Schumacher but gained arguably the most complete two-driver line-up on the grid at that time in Gerhard Berger and Jean Alesi; a perfect mixture of name talent and front-running experience. However the 1996 season was a major step back and despite 10 podiums, 8 for Alesi and 2 for Berger, the defending constructor's champions failed to win a race and finished some way off the all-conquering Williams. It was Benetton's first dry season since 1988 and both drivers visibly struggled with their car at various points in the season.

The problems were two-fold; they lost a lot of their long-time pit crew that Schumacher demanded came with him and the first of much internal team strife began to surface.

Schumacher took chief designer Rory Byrne and technical director Ross Brawn with him to Ferrari and the B196, a direct development of the B195 that had been tailored to Schumacher's driving style, was difficult for Berger and Alesi to drive with the team unable to make any radical changes at the wrong time in the development cycle.

1996 was also the year that team manager Flavio Briatore and chief engineer Tom Walkinshaw fell out. Walkinshaw had worked for Benetton since 1991 and had purchased a 50% stake in the Ligier team, using this leverage to secure Ligier's Renault engines for Benetton and use Ligier as a very in-the-shadows junior team. Walkinshaw was unable to purchase the Ligier team outright and this resulted in him selling his Ligier shares as well as leaving Benetton entirely. The Benetton family became more interested in a direct role in the team now that they were successful and changed the team's licence and identity to that of an Italian team and in the aftermath of the Walkinshaw ousting appointed several Benetton family members to positions within Benetton Formula.

f1-australian-gp-1994-world-champion-michael-schumacher-celebrates-the-benetton-team-tom-w.jpg

Walkinshaw, Schumacher and Briatore before the big upheaval.

1997 brought more turmoil to the team. Briatore was dismissed by the Benetton family in early 1997 and replaced by Rocco Benetton as team principal and David Richards as chief executive. Renault had been privatised by the French government and announced their almost immediate withdrawal from Formula One at the end of the year.

On track, Alesi's relationship with Briatore evaporated at the very first Grand Prix when he ignored instructions to pit and ran out of fuel whilst in 3rd place. Berger on the other had did win a race, the German Grand Prix, but motivation, health issues and personal bereavements led to his retirement from the sport. This left Benetton without an engine deal, an inexperienced team principal and in Giancarlo Fisichella and Alexander Wurz, two inexperienced drivers for 1998.

benetton-4.jpg

1997 was the last year of the popular Berger & Alesi double act, which had begun at Ferrari in 1993.

In a superb twist of fate Benetton maintained use of customer Renault engines after Mecachrome, the company that manufactured the engines on Renault's behalf, sold its distribution rights to Supertec, a company owned by? Who else, but Flavio Briatore!

briatore_pic_001.jpg

Briatore, pictured with Luciano Benetton, had left the team but still controlled their engine contracts.

The team had to suffer using the Supertec units (badged as Playlife, a Benetton brand) for the next three seasons and this was almost certainly the death-knell that cost the team their place at the top. At a time where Jordan and BAR were courting Honda and Williams were romancing BMW, Benetton refused to work with a major engine manufacturer and Richards' disagreements with Luciano Benetton over a deal with Ford led to Richards' dismissal after just 12 months in the role. Rocco Benetton was in sole charge of the Formula One team at the tender age of 29.

Fisichella and Wurz tried their best but Benetton was left behind in the new era of changed regulations and more competitive midfield teams. Using 1997-spec engines in the year 2000 was something you would expect of Minardi, not a team which boasted a constructor's title under its belt within the past 5 years. Jordan, Stewart and Sauber were a far cry from the Osellas, Larrousses or Scuderia Italias they had competed with earlier.

At the halfway point of 1998 Benetton had 32 points but would score just one after that. From scoring a total of 135 points across 1996-97, Benetton scored just 36 points over 1999-00.

86n9o5x.jpg

Benetton's attempts to remain in the upper third of the grid didn't quite fit the gap.

By 2001 the slump in performance, reduction in funding and chronic use of under-powered engines reached its nadir. The Benetton B201 was a woefully slow machine, hampered by a 111° angle V10 that did not bring the promise in aerodynamics it supposedly offered (as a comparison every other team was using a 90° angle in their engines), and the team was struggling to out-qualify Minardi. In fact, at the 2001 San Marino Grand Prix, the two Benettons of Giancarlo Fisichella and Jenson Button qualified 19th and 21st behind the Minardi of a young Fernando Alonso.

Blushes were spared by an extremely fortuitous 4th and 5th double points finish at the race of attrition German Grand Prix and Fisichella put in an outstanding drive at the next Grand Prix in Belgium to finish 3rd. But make no mistake, Benetton had fallen and fallen hard all the way to the last two rows of the grid.

open-uri20120928-2803-s750rg.jpg

A familiar sight by 2001; one Benetton in the midfield way off the points and another at the back way off the points.

Three years is a long time in the automotive world and Renault announced that it was returning to Formula One in late 2000 and did so in the same manner as Benetton had first entered. That irony being in purchasing a team floundering near the back of the grid. Things had hit Benetton so hard that Renault reported at the time, "the team will not race under the Renault name until it is ready to win and reap the marketing benefits."

It would be remiss to exclude on Benetton's misfortune. During this 1996-01 downturn there were some moments where cruel luck took victory and success away from Benetton:

- Alesi was comfortably leading the 1996 Monaco Grand Prix until his suspension failed

- Berger dominated the 1996 German Grand Prix until a very rare Renault engine failure robbed him of certain victory; fortunately he made no mistake in 1997 and took his and the team's final win

- Fisichella was challenging for the lead at the 1998 Canadian Grand Prix when gearbox issues held him back

- Fisichella again challenged for victory at the 1998 Austrian Grand Prix by qualifying on pole. He was on course for a good result until a clash with Jean Alesi took him out of the race

- Fisichella inherited the lead of the rain-soaked 1999 European Grand Prix and would have been on course for a victory when he slid off in the tricky conditions

2001 was the last season for Benetton Formula and in just six short years had gone from driver's and constructor's double world champions to backmarkers being sold off. It was one of the quickest falls from grace in Formula One history. A key component is that Benetton's early success came from building the team around a particular driver. They are one of the progenitors of the current trend in Formula One to have a one-driver team and after the Piquet-era and Schumacher-era drew to a close, Benetton never recaptured that momentum and placating two similarly-talented drivers in failing machinery simply never worked for them.

1920px-Button_Silverstone_2002.jpg

Benetton became Renault in 2002 and the rest, as they say, is history.

Is it correct to say that from Toleman, to Benetton, to Renault, to Lotus, and back to Renault again, the team has always been based at Enstone and used the same core of employees? How many of the original employees remain?
 
Is it correct to say that from Toleman, to Benetton, to Renault, to Lotus, and back to Renault again, the team has always been based at Enstone and used the same core of employees? How many of the original employees remain?

Benetton moved to Enstone in 1992 so no, Toleman doesn't quite count as Enstone F1. In a similar way that BAR took over Tyrrell but moved to an entirely new factory with entirely new staff.

The longest tenured employee was Pat Symonds; he joined Toleman in 1983 and remained there until 2009 when crashgate was uncovered.
 
What about the motherly receptionist who just appeared in the mid '80s and is still there, despite maintaining her resistance to email?
 
I think it's safe to say that the current LMP2 formula has been an incredible failure (in case it hasnt been mentioned already).

Oreca was keen on the rules and basically got a head start with the 05 (since it could be upgraded to 07).

The regulations have basically turned the class into a spec series. Calling them Prototypes is a joke at this point.

It says something when the distributor to a rival brand switches to the clearly dominant car in order to remain competitive.

If powertrain options had been made available then we could at least see some opportunity for diversity like we do with DPi's.
 
I think it's safe to say that the current LMP2 formula has been an incredible failure (in case it hasnt been mentioned already).

Oreca was keen on the rules and basically got a head start with the 05 (since it could be upgraded to 07).

The regulations have basically turned the class into a spec series. Calling them Prototypes is a joke at this point.

It says something when the distributor to a rival brand switches to the clearly dominant car in order to remain competitive.

If powertrain options had been made available then we could at least see some opportunity for diversity like we do with DPi's.

To be frank, its from the start basically been the ACO pretty much bending to Hugh De Chanac because he didn't like how many rival companies where out there threatening his business (Especially those Zyteks that were showing up seemingly everywhere). What makes this even more of a joke is how now you are starting to have Oreca 07s rebranded as other various names. It was fine and understandable when it was just Alpine as they did the same with the Open top Oreca and its them having that revived brand name out but G Drive's "Aurus 01"? What next, are we getting another Ibanez Racing "Wolf" rebrand like we did with 03? Are the Mcneils gonna get their grubby hands on one and rebadge it so David can sell his overpriced products worldwide? Does Paul Gentilozzi have enough scumbag money left to revitalize the "Rocketsports" name and slap that on one? The possibilities are endless.

While the DPi formula isn't most revolutionary idea (as its basically the Grand Am concept applied to P2 cars so hardly original), at least we get unique variations like the Acura ARX-05 that have something more then just lazy rebadges. Its a shame because the other two P2 chassis were amazing (hell, the Dallara is basically a unbranded Porsche 919) and the other would've been Great if Riley actually gave anywhere near a damn to sick around instead of leaving Multimatic to pick up the slack (Same goes for the awful P3 car).
 
This whole Covid-19 thing made me revisit F1 races of the past decade since the current season is no-go, and it brought back memories of a team that perhaps wasn't exactly a failure, but more of an under achiever. Either way:

Toyota F1 (2002-2009)
6gxq5fzecux31.jpg


13 podiums, 3 poles and 278.5 points in 140 GPs over 8 seasons. Respectable for a midfield, privateer team like Jordan or Arrows, but Toyota had a stratospheric 400+million budget/year, bigger than both Ferrari and McLaren (this was the West/Mercedes era, remember), and probably more than all the other teams combined. Toyota showed hints of brilliance here and there, most notably during the 2005 season where they finished 4th in the constructor championship... and then got beat by Williams, their customer team, in 2007. They sporadically scored points until 2009 where once more things looked promising in the early part of the season, only to ultimately pan out to nothing spectacular resulting in Toyota pulling the plug in November.
 
Or LMGTP. Could've been interesting to see how they would have competed against Audi and the Bentley Boys at the time...

Toyota specifically withdrew from sportscar racing to focus on the creation of its Formula One team.

Being somewhat unlucky not to win the 1999 Le Mans 24 Hours, I wonder if there was some temptation to stay had they been able to do so; the Katayama car was challenging for the lead in the final hour before a puncture occured. However, given that there was an inherent design flaw with the GT-One that led to all three cars suffering dangerous tyre blowouts, maybe there was no future in the project either way.
 
Digital F1 Directors

This was neither the first nor the only subsequent time that the premium, supposedly better DF1 feed missed something major. They even missed the Schumacher/Coulthard crash during this same race.

Incidentally, it's no fault of the commentators. Jacques Schultz and Marc Surer were fantastic together. Right up there as one of the best commentary duos of all time and it's a shame most of the people on this board can't go back, watch clips with them and appreciate them.

 
Digital F1 Directors

This was neither the first nor the only subsequent time that the premium, supposedly better DF1 feed missed something major. They even missed the Schumacher/Coulthard crash during this same race.

Incidentally, it's no fault of the commentators. Jacques Schultz and Marc Surer were fantastic together. Right up there as one of the best commentary duos of all time and it's a shame most of the people on this board can't go back, watch clips with them and appreciate them.



Which one was Murray Walker commentating on and which one had Jacques and Marc ? Just for a little more context.
 
This whole Covid-19 thing made me revisit F1 races of the past decade since the current season is no-go, and it brought back memories of a team that perhaps wasn't exactly a failure, but more of an under achiever. Either way:

Toyota F1 (2002-2009)
6gxq5fzecux31.jpg


13 podiums, 3 poles and 278.5 points in 140 GPs over 8 seasons. Respectable for a midfield, privateer team like Jordan or Arrows, but Toyota had a stratospheric 400+million budget/year, bigger than both Ferrari and McLaren (this was the West/Mercedes era, remember), and probably more than all the other teams combined. Toyota showed hints of brilliance here and there, most notably during the 2005 season where they finished 4th in the constructor championship... and then got beat by Williams, their customer team, in 2007. They sporadically scored points until 2009 where once more things looked promising in the early part of the season, only to ultimately pan out to nothing spectacular resulting in Toyota pulling the plug in November.

Looking back at this car, it kinda looks..tiny.
 
Which one was Murray Walker commentating on and which one had Jacques and Marc ? Just for a little more context.

Murray and Martin got the world feed and called the accident.

Jacques and Marc got the premium feed and missed the accident.
 
Unluck Of The Irish - Jordan's Point Of No Return

s-l400.jpg


Background

Jordan were one of Formula One's most colourful, charismatic and influential teams of the 1990s. Under the leadership of their eponymous founder Eddie Jordan, they added some flair to Formula One and their rough edges paradoxically made the sport a little bit more accessible. During the time of Britpop and Cool Britannia, Jordan reflected the zeitgeist in motorsport. It's arguable to say they were everybody's favourite underdog at one time or another.

Graduating from Formula 3000 starting in 1991, Jordan made an immediate impact by escaping the clutches of pre-qualifying during their first season and scored 13 points and a fastest lap on their way to 5th in the constructor's championship. An amazing feat at a time when most new teams to Formula One barely had one good car to scrape together and seldom threatened to be anything other than a moving chicane.

f1-monaco-gp-2002-eddie-jordan-playing-drums-with-his-band-v10.jpg

Jordan added some rock 'n' roll to Grand Prix racing.

The Zenith

In 1998, after several podiums and breakthrough drives by talented young drivers, Jordan won their first Grand Prix with what were Mugen engines on paper but practically works Honda engines in practice. They surpassed Benetton in the coveted "Big Four" group with veteran talent in Damon Hill and, in 1999, the front-running talent of Heinz-Harald Frentzen.

1999 was an unusually open season with regards to the dominant two at the sharp end of the grid. Respectively, McLaren was not having its best season due to rare errors from Mika Häkkinen and uncharacteristic unreliability from an Adrian Newey machine and Ferrari was scrambling to invest in its designated number two driver Eddie Irvine after champion-elect Michael Schumacher broke his leg mid-season.

Frentzen took two victories in France and Italy and in addition to 4 other podiums (Australia, Brazil, Germany and Belgium) and found himself just 10 points behind joint-championship leaders Häkkinen and Irvine, and on pole for the European Grand Prix. Calamitous strategies and passive drives from Irvine and Häkkinen saw them well down the order and Häkkinen salvaged two points for 5th place and Irvine scored nothing for 7th place.

There was a real opportunity for Jordan to grab the championship by the horns if Frentzen could convert his pole position.

What Went Wrong?

This:

hhf.png


Frentzen had led every lap since the start and was successfully defending his lead meritously from David Coulthard when he pitted at the end of lap 31. Almost as soon as he left the pit lane his car crawled to a stop, rolling pathetically around the first corner. The team cursed an electrical issue and Frentzen was out, out, out, as Murray Walker would say.

But was there more to it?

It turns out that "an electrical issue" was a statement from the team to spare Frentzen's blushes. At the time the car's anti-stall systems worked in a very specific way. When leaving the pits, the driver had to manually cancel the anti-stall when cancelling the pit lane speed limiter. Normally, Frentzen's race engineer Sam Michael would remind him with a "cancel, cancel" order over the radio. On this one occasion, he did not do so and simply stated that Ralf Schumacher was 4.5 seconds behind. Under the pressure of maintaining the race lead, neither Michael's usual instruction nor Frentzen's application of said instruction happened.

The anti-stall sent the car into default neutral and the engine span at extremely high revs due to Frentzen's foot being on the accelerator. Frentzen mistakenly believed that he had lost the driveshaft, cut the engine and parked the car. When it was brought back to the garage, the car started perfectly first time.

The Consequences

Frentzen retired but due to Häkkinen and Irvine's poor showings, was still only 12 points behind with two races to go. Unfortunately for Frentzen and Jordan, they only scored 3 points over the final two races and finished 22 points behind championship winner Häkkinen but still secured a remarkable 3rd place in both the drivers and constructors championship of which both can be immensely proud of.

championship-rivals-heinz-harald-frentzen-mika-hakkinen-eddie-irvine-picture-id650794488

Frentzen was still in with a shout but not winning the European Grand Prix was a huge blow to an unlikely title challenge.

Had Frenzten been able to win the European Grand Prix, and without changing the fabric of reality too much let's assume Häkkinen and Irvine are bumped down to 6th and 8th, Frenzten would have been 1 point behind with two races to go. It's not at all unreasonable to suggest that he would have had a very real chance at the championship.

The Point Of No Return & Aftermath

Following this season, Jordan would never again challenge at the sharp end of the grid. They competed in Formula One for six more years but amassed just four more podiums, two of which were the next year in 2000 when there was still an element of competitiveness and two which were very fortuitous, the last one especially; Giancarlo Fisichella's surprise win at the 2003 Brazilian Grand Prix and Tiago Monteiro's famous but asterisked third place at the 2005 United States Grand Prix.

4c946c58e3f271d0633e3b462d934b80.jpg

Giancarlo Fisichella's debut victory came in his second spell with the team that gave him his big break in Formula One.

Weak car design, poor race-day setup and a variety of other factors came into play to explain why this fall from grace occurred. Many would point to Jordan missing out on the official works Honda contract; Jordan and BAR went head-to-head to curry Honda's favour and despite Jordan outscoring BAR in both the 2001 and 2002 seasons, Honda decided to take a keener interest in the Brackley outfit and we know how that panned out... ...eventually.

Others would point to weak management and poor driver line-ups as being one reason why Jordan stopped being competitive, lost sponsors, therefore funding and ultimately slipped to the back row of the grid; Eddie Jordan fell out with team legend Frentzen and publicly sacked him on the eve of his home Grand Prix in 2001 and latterly lost a big court case with Vodafone and Ferrari which severely dented the team's finances and credibility. Drivers of latter-day Jordan fame such as Giorgio Pantano, Zsolt Baumgartner and Ralph Firman weren't a patch on previous Jordan debutants such as Michael Schumacher, Rubens Barrichello and Ralf Schumacher.

Heinz-Harold-Frentzen-with-Eddie-Jordan.jpg

Frentzen delivered the team their greatest success but was dismissed acrimoniously.

By 2005 and with just Minardi for competition at the rear of the grid, Eddie Jordan sold up. His baby went through some awful subsequent management through Midland and Spyker and it wasn't until another controversial figure in Vijay Mallya took over in 2008 that the continuity factory and team had some stability and it wasn't until 2010 that they even became reasonably competitive again, 11 years after Jordan's peak.

Summary

Many teams come and go, rise and fall, but it is unusual to be able to pinpoint exactly where it went wrong and the point at which the team would never surpass their previous best. However in Jordan's case, that is possible and it is lap 32 of the 1999 European Grand Prix.

An awful twist of mistake and misfortune.

2019_Formula_One_tests_Barcelona%2C_Stroll_%2847209286722%29.jpg

The continuity Grand Prix team lives on through several takeovers as Racing Point but Jordan are long gone from Formula One.
 
Last edited:
Unluck Of The Irish - Jordan's Point Of No Return

s-l400.jpg


Background

Jordan were one of Formula One's most colourful, charismatic and influential teams of the 1990s. Under the leadership of their eponymous founder Eddie Jordan, they added some flair to Formula One and their rough edges paradoxically made the sport a little bit more accessible. During the time of Britpop and Cool Britannia, Jordan reflected the zeitgeist in motorsport. It's arguable to say they were everybody's favourite underdog at one time or another.

Graduating from Formula 3000 starting in 1991, Jordan made an immediate impact by escaping the clutches of pre-qualifying during their first season and scored 13 points and a fastest lap on their way to 5th in the constructor's championship. An amazing feat at a time when most new teams to Formula One barely had one good car to scrape together and seldom threatened to be anything other than a moving chicane.

f1-monaco-gp-2002-eddie-jordan-playing-drums-with-his-band-v10.jpg

Jordan added some rock 'n' roll to Grand Prix racing.

The Zenith

In 1998, after several podiums and breakthrough drives by talented young drivers, Jordan won their first Grand Prix with what were Mugen engines on paper but practically works Honda engines in practice. They surpassed Benetton in the coveted "Big Four" group with veteran talent in Damon Hill and, in 1999, the front-running talent of Heinz-Harald Frentzen.

1999 was an unusually open season with regards to the dominant two at the sharp end of the grid. Respectively, McLaren was not having its best season due to rare errors from Mika Häkkinen and uncharacteristic unreliability from an Adrian Newey machine and Ferrari was scrambling to invest in its designated number two driver Eddie Irvine after champion-elect Michael Schumacher broke his leg mid-season.

Frentzen took two victories in France and Italy and in addition to 4 other podiums (Australia, Brazil, Germany and Belgium) and found himself just 10 points behind joint-championship leaders Häkkinen and Irvine, and on pole for the European Grand Prix. Calamitous strategies and passive drives from Irvine and Häkkinen saw them well down the order and Häkkinen salvaged two points for 5th place and Irvine scored nothing for 7th place.

There was a real opportunity for Jordan to grab the championship by the horns if Frentzen could convert his pole position.

What Went Wrong?

This:

View attachment 918089

Frentzen had led every lap since the start and was successfully defending his lead meritously from David Coulthard when he pitted at the end of lap 31. Almost as soon as he left the pit lane his car crawled to a stop, rolling pathetically around the first corner. The team cursed an electrical issue and Frentzen was out, out, out, as Murray Walker would say.

But was there more to it?

It turns out that "an electrical issue" was a statement from the team to spare Frentzen's blushes. At the time the car's anti-stall systems worked in a very specific way. When leaving the pits, the driver had to manually cancel the anti-stall when cancelling the pit lane speed limiter. Normally, Frentzen's race engineer Sam Michael would remind him with a "cancel, cancel" order over the radio. On this one occasion, he did not do so and simply stated that Ralf Schumacher was 4.5 seconds behind. Under the pressure of maintaining the race lead, neither Michael's usual instruction nor Frentzen's application of said instruction happened.

The anti-stall sent the car into default neutral and the engine span at extremely high revs due to the usual application of the accelerator that. Frentzen mistakenly believed that he had lost the driveshaft, cut the engine and parked the car. When it was brought back to the garage, the car started perfectly first time.

The Consequences

Frentzen retired but due to Häkkinen and Irvine's poor showings, was still only 12 points behind with two races to go. Unfortunately for Frentzen and Jordan, they only scored 3 points over the final two races and finished 22 points behind championship winner Häkkinen but still secured a remarkable 3rd place in both the drivers and constructors championship of which both can be immensely proud of.

championship-rivals-heinz-harald-frentzen-mika-hakkinen-eddie-irvine-picture-id650794488

Frentzen was still in with a shout but not winning the European Grand Prix was a huge blow to an unlikely title challenge.

Had Frenzten been able to win the European Grand Prix, and without changing the fabric of reality too much let's assume Häkkinen and Irvine are bumped down to 6th and 8th, Frenzten would have been 1 point behind with two races to go. It's not at all unreasonable to suggest that he would have had a very real chance at the championship.

The Point Of No Return & Aftermath

Following this season, Jordan would never again challenge at the sharp end of the grid. They competed in Formula One for six more years but amassed just four more podiums, two of which were the next year in 2000 when there was still an element of competitiveness and two which were very fortuitous, the last one especially; Giancarlo Fisichella's surprise win at the 2003 Brazilian Grand Prix and Tiago Monteiro's famous but asterisked third place at the 2005 United States Grand Prix.

4c946c58e3f271d0633e3b462d934b80.jpg

Giancarlo Fisichella's debut victory came in his second spell with the team that gave him his big break in Formula One.

Weak car design, poor race-day setup and a variety of other factors came into play to explain why this fall from grace occurred. Many would point to Jordan missing out on the official works Honda contract; Jordan and BAR went head-to-head to curry Honda's favour and despite Jordan outscoring BAR in both the 2001 and 2002 seasons, Honda decided to take a keener interest in the Brackley outfit and we know how that panned out... ...eventually.

Others would point to weak management and poor driver line-ups as being one reason why Jordan stopped being competitive, lost sponsors, therefore funding and ultimately slipped to the back row of the grid; Eddie Jordan fell out with team legend Frentzen and publicly sacked him on the eve of his home Grand Prix in 2001 and latterly lost a big court case with Vodafone and Ferrari which severely dented the team's finances and credibility. Drivers of latter-day Jordan fame such as Giorgio Pantano, Zsolt Baumgartner and Ralph Firman weren't a patch on previous Jordan debutants such as Michael Schumacher, Rubens Barrichello and Ralf Schumacher.

Heinz-Harold-Frentzen-with-Eddie-Jordan.jpg

Frentzen delivered the team their greatest success but was dismissed acrimoniously.

By 2005 and with just Minardi for competition at the rear of the grid, Eddie Jordan sold up. His baby went through some awful subsequent management through Midland and Spyker and it wasn't until another controversial figure in Vijay Mallya took over in 2008 that the continuity factory and team had some stability and it wasn't until 2010 that they even became reasonably competitive again, 11 years after Jordan's peak.

Summary

Many teams come and go, rise and fall, but it is unusual to be able to pinpoint exactly where it went wrong and the point at which the team would never surpass their previous best. However in Jordan's case, that is possible and it is lap 32 of the 1999 European Grand Prix.

An awful twist of mistake and misfortune.

2019_Formula_One_tests_Barcelona%2C_Stroll_%2847209286722%29.jpg

The continuity Grand Prix team lives on through several takeovers as Racing Point but Jordan are long gone from Formula One.

"Couldn't handle success, eh Steve?", is what my karting mentor John Fey tossed at me after I failed to convert my first pole into a win.
I, probably like the lot of us, was stunned by the design, shape and color of the Jordan, and cheered mightily for seasons. But in the end, I guess they just couldn't deal with success.
 
Frentzen always struck me as the kind of driver that didn't really belong on the sharp end of the grid and got there with a bit of luck, like Irvine (especially) and Coulthard. Right place, right time, but ultimately not enough raw talent when it counted.
 
Frentzen always struck me as the kind of driver that didn't really belong on the sharp end of the grid and got there with a bit of luck, like Irvine (especially) and Coulthard. Right place, right time, but ultimately not enough raw talent when it counted.

Yet for a long time in the 1990s he was touted as supposedly being faster than Michael Schumacher in raw pace and Williams put Damon Hill, the then current world champion, into the shade in order to sign him.

It certainly changed after his time at Williams. Frentzen admitted as much that his time there were the two worst seasons of his career and that's saying something considering his touch of death in back-to-back liquidations with Prost and Arrows.
 
A Load Of Pollocks - The BAR 001

dfc0315f899df758b22abee7ab88772e.jpg


Background


Tyrrell. Several things will immediately be circling through your mind when you hear that word; Jackie Stewart, the P34, Cosworth, Jean Alesi. One of the great innovators who had fallen on hard times by the 1990s. In 1998 Tyrrell was purchased by British American Tobacco who, long before Red Bull made the transition from sponsorship to team owners, had decided to take the unusual step of not being just a title sponsor but a team in their own right.

After a final whimper in 1998, Tyrrell did not make it to the 1999 Formula One grid. BAT as team owners had essentially purchased the team for nothing more than their slot on the grid. Tyrrell's assets were defunct, their factory closed down and BAT used the hollow Tyrrell had left on the grid to insert their all-new, big budget, ground-up team based in Brackley.

agp_98_rosset_tyrrell.jpg

Three-time championship winners Tyrrell ended their life at the back of the grid with the 026 and Riccardo Rosset.

Grandiose Plans - Big Budgets & Big Names

The new team were given a healthy budget from their BAT superiors, such was their unwillingness to simply make up the numbers. This budget was used to underwrite serious players for what was promised to be a serious effort:

  • Craig Pollock was given the senior team management role
  • Thanks to Pollock, 1997 Formula One champion Jacques Villeneuve was the lead driver
  • 1998 FIA GT World Champion Ricardo Zonta was given the second car
  • Engineering and other technical support was provided by world-conquering Reynard
  • Reynard also brought chief designer Malcolm Oastler, whose IndyCars had won eight times at the Brickyard
  • Engines were sourced from ex-Renault Supertec units, which had powered 3rd & 5th in the previous year's constructor's championship

It was all very promising but Craig Pollock wasn't content to make an unassuming debut. Conspicuousness and controversy were the orders of the day. Adrian Reynard had long promised Pollock to help him set up a Formula One team if Pollock could find enough funding. BAT had aligned those stars for Pollock and Reynard.

His confidence was bubbling and at an early press conference detailing Reynard's involvement with the project, Pollock championed how Reynard had been in pole position in the first year and won in the second year of every series it had entered. Such was this confidence that Pollock brazenly claimed that BAR would win on its debut. Building a team around Jacques Villeneuve, a driver who had exploded onto the F1 scene in his first two seasons, success was merely destiny.

The Launch

The launch of the BAR 001 was one of the most bizarre and divisive launches in Formula One history. At a time when the resistance to tobacco advertising was beginning to gather momentum, BAT was adamant about selling their core product. So much so that it didn't just want a mobile fag packet like Camel, Rothmans, Marlboro or West, it wanted two of them.

The media and paddock was stunned. One white and red Lucky Strike car for Villeneuve, one blue and yellow 555 car for Zonta. The marketing department must have been very proud of themselves having gained recognised exposure for one brand popular in the Americas and another popular in Asian markets.

upbar.jpg

Amongst the amusement and tittering, it cannot be denied that each car was actually rather handsome.

Immediately the FIA prohibited these jumped-up new boys. You could not run cars in different liveries. Fine, rules are rules. They can choose from one of two very lovely liveried cars, right? That's not what BAR decided. They decided to forcibly get their messages across by creating a hybrid of the two liveries with a silver nose from which a zip ran down the car's "seam". This asymmetrical split livery was even more controversial but as they were planning to run it for both cars making them "identical", it was permitted. Just.

The Racing Season

BAR was supposed to win on its debut. When the team arrived in Australia with their kitted out transporters and garages, every team and even Stewart Grand Prix, only in their third season themselves, were laughing at BAR's slogan A Tradition Of Excellence. Hardly an apt motto for a team with no history. The team was quickly being written off as a vanity project; 555 and Lucky Strike weren't even that well known in the F1-critical European market and nor in Australia where the season started.

For a team expecting or fantasising to win on their debut, Villeneuve's 11th place and Zonta's 19th place qualifying were hardly encouraging. The double DNF was just salt, vinegar and chilli poweder in the wound; Villeneuve was lucky to excape unhurt when his rear wing failed at 180mph whilst Zonta trundled round in the lower midfield before suffering a gearbox failure.

That set the tone for the rest of the season. Villeneuve, champion just two years previously and well capable of a top drive at almost any team, suffered a colossal eleven consecutive DNFs. He failed to bring the car home until he finished 15th at the twelfth race of the season in Belgium. Coupled with Villeneuve's severe accident in Australia, Zonta broke his foot in qualifying for his home race in Brazil and missed three races. In his absence, Mika Salo secured BAR's best finish of the season with 7th in San Marino. Outside of the points.

Overall, BAR finished last in the constructor's championship. The only team to not score a point in 1999; Minardi's Marc Gene gained a solitary point at the Nürburgring and had Badoer's car not failed so very near the end it could have been a 4th place and even more comparative misery for BAR. With their massive budget, BAR finished plum last, not just behind Minardi and Arrows but well behind other lesser-funded teams like Stewart, Sauber and Jordan, teams which rather famously did score points in their own respective debut seasons.

180962767cf322bf8a6e439c47145ff3.jpg

Zonta was outclassed by Villeneuve but there was very little to write home about.

Spa

After their split livery, there's one thing that the BAR 001 is most famous for. The double qualifying smash at Radillon. Two violent crashes which both drivers were lucky to walk away from.

First, Villeneuve lost control of his car on the run up through Radillon, collided with the wall on the right bank of the track and rolled. The session was red flagged. Then, almost as soon as it was restarted, Zonta's BAR was violently hurtling across the track at Radillon with no wheels and no wings. Craig Pollock recalled looking at the monitor and just thinking "Jesus, this just cannot be happening!"

As it transpired, Villeneuve and Zonta both bet with each other that they couldn't go flat out through Eau Rouge. Crazy. Even crazier when you consider that Zonta still went and did it after Villeneuve only just walked away.

CMubMlhWsAAmWd8.jpg

Lighting never strikes twice but anything can happen in Formula One and it usually does.

Examination - The Case For The Prosecution

The BAR 001 was, quite simply, terribly unreliable. A rear wing failure is a rare occurrence in Formula One but that is exactly what happened on its debut. Suspension failures were common as were engine failures, which leads on to another exhibit.

The Supertec engines were not good enough. 1997-spec machinery with no development was indicative of an inferior engine. In the two years that had elapsed since official Renault support, they just weren't as reliable as they had been as well as no longer being powerful enough. This was also a factor highlighted in the Benetton retrospective, with Williams also noticeably lacking in power the same year.

Reynard had little to no direct experience in Formula One. Certainly not enough to make the claims it had. Although it wasn't to be predicted at the time, they were also right on the cusp of their own demise. Reynard had overreached itself by expanding into almost every facet of motorsport and was in severe financial difficulties. By 2002, the firm collapsed from a once previously unimpeachable dominance.

When your technical partners are patching holes in their own work, it's hardly going to help you. Craig Pollock reflected extremely negatively on Adrian Reynard during the season, as was noted in several publications at the time.

Driverwise, Villeneuve was promised a team built around him but the promised performance wasn't delivered, a demotivating blow for a driver already crestfallen after his 1998 title defence crumbled before the first qualifying session was over. In Zonta's case, he struggled like a lot of the drivers new for 1999. The grooved slicks were difficult to get to grips with for those totally unfamiliar and without one year's experience under their belt.

Mitigation - The Case For The Defence

The season was unquestionably a disaster for BAR. Not just because they had squandered a huge budget but also because they set their own expectations too high, promised too much and failed to deliver. But as it is always said, any press is good press. BAR was the talk of the grandstands throughout the entire year. They weren't ignored which, whilst is only a crumb of comfort, is definitely not to be discounted.

The car wasn't necessarily uncompetitive, either. Although unreliable it frequently ran inside the top 10. Villeneuve was on course for a definite points finish and potentially a podium in Spain. Its pace wasn't what it was claimed to be but it wasn't catastrophic for a new team by any stretch of the imagination.

The biggest mitigation for salvaging the BAR 001 is that, to their credit, BAR learnt their lesson for their second season. They didn't persist with a losing formula. The Supertec units were replaced with Honda units, which would be the start of a fruitful relationship. The 002 was immediately better than the 001, scoring a double points finish at the first attempt on its way to 20 points and 5th in the constructor's championship, narrowly missing out on 4th on countback. A less controversial livery in sole Lucky Strike branding was a normalising act and retracting the wild claims of domination helped them settle in on their way to the upper midfield.

jv-1.jpg

BAR's legacy from the 001 is that no matter how big your budget is, don't write cheques that you can't cash.
 
Last edited:
Ferrari 575 GTC

large_1576772822_05fiagtmonzatest_jb_0650.jpg


Conceived by Ferrari to try and get some of the success that Prodrive achieved with the 550, N Technology were entrusted with the official factory blessed 575 GT GTS class project. Project started 2002 with the cars starting to race in FIA GT 2003 from the Estoril round which it won in the hands of JMB Racing. JMB Racing also won the Donnington FIA GT round in 2004 with the car following a late race clash between a Porsche and the race leading Vitaphone Saleen (Bartels and Alzen were not happy). Second at Spa 24h 2004 in the hands of GPC Giesse Squadra Corse but was leading when hit with mechanical troubles. And that was that for the highlights of the last Ferrari blessed V12 racer program.

Dutch team Barron Connor Racing entered the car in Le Mans Series 2004 without any wins and barely any podiums. Le Mans was a race to forget for the team and my main memory of their race was the mechanics ripping up the garage floor tiles to make room for a 575 with its brakes on fire. Ferrari created an Evo package for the 2005 season but by then it was too late. Barron Connor dropped the car at the end of the 2004 season being very frustrated with the cars lack of performance. and updates. JMB replaced the 575 for the 2005 season in FIA GT with the Maserati MC12 but did run the car at Le Mans. GPC stopped racing the 575 at end of 2005. I believe the car raced on in Italian GT but thats about it. A dozen cars were produced including four EVO models.

Ironically Prodrive approached Ferrari to work together on the 550 in the early days of their project but Ferrari weren't interested.

I've heard numerous reasons over the years why the car was such a failure compared to the Prodrive 550 which included project done on a fixed cost, the car having a very small sweet spot for setup, insufficient aero packages etc. The car was 700k Euro brand new which was a lot more expensive then the other cars in the class.

I remember when Ferrari first launched the 575 and I thought well if Prodrive can do so well without Ferrari's support then Ferrari themselves should be able to build a similarly successful car. Its even worse when you consider that Prodrive had to create cars from second hand road cars as Ferrari wouldn't supply them. Its pretty disappointing considering the potential the car appeared to have. Its a shame that the car didn't write more history for Ferrari at Le Mans but in the GTS class of that era you really had to bring your A game when you take on Prodrive and Pratt & Miller.. There couldn't be any weak links to beat those guys.

History aside its a pretty cool looking car especially in unpainted form as above.
 
Last edited:
bandiera-nera-schumacher-800x452.jpg


A different kind of failure.

In my recent boredom I decided to revisit a time I think the FIA and race stewards got it wrong, went against their own rules and, this time, they actually did punish the driver; Michael Schumacher at the 1994 British Grand Prix. It went like this:

Formation Lap
Michael Schumacher (2nd place) deliberately overtook polesitter Damon Hill twice on the formation lap. This is an illegal manoeuver.

Lap 14
After deliberation by the stewards he was given a 5 second stop-and-go penalty roughly 27 minutes later.

Laps 20-21
Six laps later, Schumacher still had not come in to serve the penalty. Therefore, on lap 21, he was shown the disqualification black flag.

Laps 22-26
Schumacher did not acknowledge the black flag also. After discussion between Benetton and race director Roland Bruynseraede, the black flag was withdrawn.

Lap 27
Schumacher served his 5 second stop-and-go penalty, going on to finish the Grand Prix in 2nd place.

What transpired during the race and what happened subsequent to that was farcical. Schumacher did not serve the stop-and-go issued on lap 14 because Benetton claimed that they were informed that the penalty was a time penalty to be added after the race. Therefore Schumacher did not know that he had an in-race penalty to serve. When Schumacher was shown the black flag on lap 21, Benetton informed Schumacher that they were appealling the decision and told him to stay out; Benetton's reason for appealling the black flag was confusion over the original penalty, that they did not know that Schumacher had a stop-and-go to serve.

Benetton's Tom Walkinshaw and the FIA's Roland Bruynseraede had discussions in the pitlane where Walkinshaw claimed, with the actual paperwork issued to him by the stewards, that what Benetton had been told and what the stewards had said were two different things. Bruynseraede was surprised by this and the two agreed a compromise; the stewards would withdraw the disqualification black flag and Benetton would order Schumacher to serve his original stop-and-go penalty.

Having completed the race and finshed 2nd, Schumacher celebrated on the podium. The initial post-race punishment saw the stewards fine Benetton Formula $25,000 and give severe reprimands to both the team and a severe reprimand to Schumacher personally. The matter was considered settled. However, despite the confusion over the penalty and the race director's acquiesence to compromise mid-race over the black flag situation, and the stewards having already settled the matter post-race, two weeks after the event the FIA fined Benetton an additional $500,000 and retroactively disqualified Schumacher from the Grand Prix and gave him a two race ban.

Benetton appealled, adding that the race stewards also made a mistake by not notifying them within 15 minutes of the offence as specified in the regulations in addition to the general confusion over the type of penalty issued. The appeal was rejected and Schumacher's two race ban stood.

It is important to get a few things straight with this incident:

Was Schumacher in the wrong?
Absolutely. There is no question that he made illegal manoeuvers on the formation lap that required a penalty. Why he even did it became irrelevant and has never really been answered. It was a strange thing to do at all.

Was Benetton in the wrong?
Arguably. Benetton were able to prove to the race director that they were misinformed about the penalty and informed later than was permitted in the regulations. Benetton appealling the black flag and telling Schumacher to stay out is obviously their biggest mistake here but, in racing conditions, it is perhaps not condonable but understandable; had Schumacher retired as instructed only to then find out that there was a mistake by the stewards, as Benetton believed at the time, and he could have continued racing, it would have been extremely embarrassing and frustrating from a racing perspective.

Were the stewards or race director in the wrong?
In one case, definitely. The penalty was issued after the allowed timeframe specified in the regulations.
In the other case, more than likely. The stewards and race director accepted mid-race that there was confusion over the original penalty and agreed to withdraw the black flag. If there wasn't any confusion they could have easily just insisted on the black flag no matter what Benetton's protests were.

1994 was the first season where the FIA was in direct control over Formula One's administration; the automous, dreaded FISA had been abolished the year previous. Many might not remember the political struggle in F1 at that time and the image of the sport in the previous decade or so. The FIA wanted to set down a marker, let everybody know that it was in control and both Benetton and Michael Schumacher were made examples of, rightly or wrongly.

The Cynical Points Of View

There are two:

Benetton were arrogant and simply tried to ignore being punished and get away with everything as they always did at that time.

In wanting to spice up a sport which was losing viewers year-on-year (there were also no full-time World Champions on the grid after Senna's death) they found a reason to 'punish' Michael Schumacher, suspending him when he was 37 points (~95pts today) clear in the championship to give others a chance to catch up.

Opinionated Summary

Briatore Benetton did do wrong. I get it and I don't disagree with those who look on this era of Benetton-Briatore-Schumacher with derision; the launch control, the tampered fuel filters which nearly killed Jos Verstappen, the illegal plank, Adelaide, it goes on. It's very easy to look at anything even remotely controversial associated with them and go "Nope, they tried to cheat. Simple as." but I do think that this is one case where they weren't totally in the wrong and got an extremely harsh punishment for no justified reason; Benetton and Schumacher got slapped when they had a Grand Prix to contest but the stewards who made a mistake affecting the running of a Grand Prix (and Roland Bruynseraede) didn't come out of it with anywhere near as much bad publicity when they had at least as much of a share of the blame.

A retroactive disqualification is one thing. Even though I can understand the view of "My team told me to ignore a black flag you shouldn't have shown me because of a mistake you made giving me a penalty that you couldn't", ignoring a black flag is still ignoring a black flag. Unfortunate but within the rules, just about. A two race ban seems needlessly harsh though.

None of this would have happened if Schumacher hadn't bizarrely overtake Hill twice on the formation lap but it showed that exactitude in communication and clarity in rules and penalties definitely needed to improve in Formula One.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back