- 27,213
- United Kingdom
The Daewoo Matiz is fun in that bouncing-off-the-bumpstops-tripoding-around-slow-corners-kind-of-way.
I like to think of it as the "thrash the ass off it everywhere and never fall foul of a speed limit" factor
The Daewoo Matiz is fun in that bouncing-off-the-bumpstops-tripoding-around-slow-corners-kind-of-way.
I like to think of it as the "thrash the ass off it everywhere and never fall foul of a speed limit" factor
I'd still never buy one of those cars if I had the chance at a decent one like the Focus, though... not unless they cost me next to nothing and I had a LeMons race to run them in...
Now I'm missing the Maruti Alto we had for a week last year. Epic fun. No grip. No power. No weight. The last part more than makes up for the other two.
Well a Matiz will set you back from about £700 in the UK.
You can find Focii for the same money but mileage will be interstellar, it'll be as smokey as a forest fire and the bodywork will look like it's gone ten rounds with Tyson.
I suspect Danny has paid a bit more for his than he got back for selling Kermit.
This is something I'll get to enjoy doing in a few months, first car. Can't really do insurance for anything with a remotely large engine (Skoda Felicia, 1.4l @ £145/month on cheapest quote.) Quite enjoyed the Fiat Panda (new shape) I learnt and did my test in, weighed nothing which counters the lack of power. Problem for me with small cars is actually having enough leg-room to get in them.
I might end up going for something a little odd, I don't want the 106-type small cars.
So a Panda, Ka, Fiesta, whatever should still be cheaper (as long as you don't go for a big engine) than a Mondeo or whatever, regardless of the likelihood of new drivers having bigger cars.
I think that classic car insurance only really applies when you're using it as a second car, doesn't it?
I agree though, if I'd been more knowledgeable I would have got something like an MGB GT as my first car, since they're now out of my price range for a good one but back then they weren't. You live and learn...
So a Panda, Ka, Fiesta, whatever should still be cheaper (as long as you don't go for a big engine) than a Mondeo or whatever, regardless of the likelihood of new drivers having bigger cars.
As someone who has been lusting after a Mondeo for the last 11 months, I can confirm this theory.
Oddly, I've found the opposite to be true. The Focus is cheaper for me to insure than a lower-spec Fiesta would be. The Mondeo, however is another matter.
No, it can apply to only cars.
Problem was that, when I was first driving, I needed a car to get around. A car to work on - which I'd have liked - wouldn't have worked. Literally and figuratively. Of course, now I have both, so it's all good. I might be able to slip Marvin on classic too, since he's 17.
best first time car in my opinion has to be the Honda Civic Sport 1.6 iVTEC.
110Bhp, cheap insurance and one of the best handling cars around.
It's a good car, but I'm not sure it's a great first car. I mean, if someone had given me one as a first car I certainly wouldn't have complained, but "cheap insurance" is very relative... I highly doubt it's that cheap compared to the usual first car options.
That is a very valid point about the insurance. Civic Sport is insurance group 6 in the UK, and it costs me about £4000 per year
You're paying £4000 a year? £4000 a year?! What have you done to the poor thing - stuck a jet engine on the back?
haha! yeah £4000 per year! around £450 a month, its worth it though
haha! yeah £4000 per year! around £450 a month, its worth it though
You pay twice a month what I pay for a year's insurance on my MX5...