First in game look at "standard" cars in Granturismo 6
- Thread starter TheeFrogmanlego
- 802 comments
- 113,796 views
- 1,179
- Minsk
- eugene2023
From the new screenshots of the cars, the Lotus looks standard to me. The chrome bumper is just a rendered texture in the car model itselfs instead of a modelled bumper into the car model. The headlights too, are to undetailed for a premium, isn't it ? Or is it a In-betweeny subpremium car ?
Then what about this one?
- 784
- Utrecht
- YukinoSuzuka
No need to be rude
As I'm saying, the Lotus doesn't look bad at all and I'm not unhappy with it or complaining it looks bad to me, it was just a comment on this car that it looks less premium than other premium cars and there I thought this could be a standard car or maybe a sub-premium car. Notting wrong about that. At first the bumper. It looks like a part of the body shell instead of being a bumper mounted to the bodyshell. I know that the original Europa have this bumper too, very smooth into the body, but it looks to plain for me. May I ? It's just an opinion. ?
I don't say I'm not happy with it, I more say that I thought it could be a standard car and that was more like a compliment to PD then complaining about this car. It's way way better then we had in GT5 and if they didn't make it a premium car, I still love to drive (and drift) with it. I'm a big fan of the standards and never complained about them.
Edit: Yes I mentioned the interior and that was why I was confused and sceptical about the front bumper and headlights (texture) and thinking it maybe could be a upscaled standard car. More a possitive note then from my point of view then people thinking I'm a complainer... No I am not.
zzz_pt
Premium
- 8,188
- Porto living in Hamburg
- zzz_pt
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/clean-em-up-standards-to-premium-read-op.248494/
This thread is full of work of people that transformed standards into premium models.
I would like to see that improvment in GT6...but I'm not very optimistic until I see a shot of a standard car in GT6.
This thread is full of work of people that transformed standards into premium models.
I would like to see that improvment in GT6...but I'm not very optimistic until I see a shot of a standard car in GT6.
- 369
- West Yorkshire
- DRambo
But why choose a standard at all when they can show off the new premiums? Perhaps they are demonstrating how good the standards are now? We don't know, but I cannot believe they will have spent lots of time "tarting up" all the standards.
The most likely answer is usually the correct one - it's a premium! Time will tell!!!!
- 10,958
- Canada
You're not the only one. 👍
Yeah, something like this is what I hope for in GT6.I hope they will update textures for standards, especially alpha channels.
Something like this:
- 58
- Pennsylvania
- SaulWolfden
I'm sure the standards will still have the cockpit view that was added I believe in Spec 2.0 update for Gran Turismo 5, I don't know why they'd remove that feature since they know plenty of people (myself included) like to use the cockpit view.
@Abraxas - That would be perfectly acceptable if that was what they did to update the standards imo.
@Abraxas - That would be perfectly acceptable if that was what they did to update the standards imo.
- 5,535
- Italy
- karsten_beoulve
what view are u talkin about?
- 58
- Pennsylvania
- SaulWolfden
- 58
- Pennsylvania
- SaulWolfden
- 7,830
- U S A
- Tetsumura
- Nigel Fox
Hey now, we don't know this for a fact at all. There are a lot of details about GT6 we know nothing about, and I prefer that it be this way. I don't want to know everything about it before I get it... I want to experience it.
I have to quibble with this. The whole of GT1 was a pleasant surprise, even though SONY had Kaz reduce the gravity slightly for us in the west to make it more "exciting." Used cars and the Event Maker in GT2. Photo Mode and roof cam in GT4. Course Maker in GT5, even the fireworks are neat. You could assert that these are all examples of those strange things that sorta work, but it's also one of those individual reaction things too. Many of us are delighted with these goodies. I was overjoyed to find that most of the Standard cars were just awesome. A few of them even have more aero options than their Premium counterparts, strangely enough, and only someone like me would discover this.
We don't know much at all about how online is going to work, but mysteriously, the doomsayers don't seem to be too vocal about it. I'm not sure why some things are given the benefit of the doubt around here, and some unknowns are signs of the apocalypse.
It's only a few weeks before we start digging into this box of candies to see what Kaz gave us. Unlike Obamacare, I expect this to be full of good surprises.
- 1,211
- Earth
- TheLordSnowden
- LordSnowden
To put this more in context, GT games hype has always exceeded the result. This is where surprises get muted, but that's not to say there aren't great things... But more times than not people are like "interesting, they did that in a strange way" vs other products that go for the "finally! The feature we have all been looking forward to has finally arrived and it's what we expected".Hey now, we don't know this for a fact at all. There are a lot of details about GT6 we know nothing about, and I prefer that it be this way. I don't want to know everything about it before I get it... I want to experience it.
I have to quibble with this. The whole of GT1 was a pleasant surprise, even though SONY had Kaz reduce the gravity slightly for us in the west to make it more "exciting." Used cars and the Event Maker in GT2. Photo Mode and roof cam in GT4. Course Maker in GT5, even the fireworks are neat. You could assert that these are all examples of those strange things that sorta work, but it's also one of those individual reaction things too. Many of us are delighted with these goodies. I was overjoyed to find that most of the Standard cars were just awesome. A few of them even have more aero options than their Premium counterparts, strangely enough, and only someone like me would discover this.
We don't know much at all about how online is going to work, but mysteriously, the doomsayers don't seem to be too vocal about it. I'm not sure why some things are given the benefit of the doubt around here, and some unknowns are signs of the apocalypse.
It's only a few weeks before we start digging into this box of candies to see what Kaz gave us. Unlike Obamacare, I expect this to be full of good surprises.
There have been many "moon rover" type things that make us go "wtf?! Don't get me wrong but..." In the GT series.
And first iteration product don't count as they don't have context... Especially GT 1, that was revolutionary for the time. Just like GTA, FF7, resident evil, etc. the newest unique IP games that are innovative struggle like crazy to replicate that "wow" factor again and frankly few are able to do it again... It's something the industry struggles with especially with any sequels.
Obamacare?! Omg the debacle of the century!
- 659
- Germany
- ZoidFile
No need to be rude
As I'm saying, the Lotus doesn't look bad at all and I'm not unhappy with it or complaining it looks bad to me, it was just a comment on this car that it looks less premium than other premium cars and there I thought this could be a standard car or maybe a sub-premium car. Notting wrong about that. At first the bumper. It looks like a part of the body shell instead of being a bumper mounted to the bodyshell. I know that the original Europa have this bumper too, very smooth into the body, but it looks to plain for me. May I ? It's just an opinion. ?
To be honest, when I first saw this model, I thought it looked kind of strange as well.
There're many little things, like the front bumper, the way the doors stand out from the body and strangely bend side windows that look a bit "off".
But once I saw pictures of the original, I came to the conclusion that the Europa is a car with many odd shapes and is in itself not terribly well made. I think the modeler just struggled a bit to exactly capture the car. After all game modeling is not a hard science and involves more eye measurement as you may think.
Last edited:
- 7,830
- U S A
- Tetsumura
- Nigel Fox
I suppose this is true for a good number of gamers. Two examples come to mind in GT4: the Mercedez steam powered carriage, and Photo Mode. The car was simply a curiosity which a tiny fraction of gamers took on the road. An elite few even ran it successfully around the Nurburgring, which I understand is impossible due to the substantial elevation changes unless you manage the throttle carefully. And not many were initially excited about Photo Mode. I would likely have ignored it for a long time, but a relative gave it a run just after getting GT4 himself, and I was sorely impressed with it.
GT6 is likely going to be the same way, as we're getting the core game at launch, with a few extra goodies in the launch patch. And then features will come along periodically, both like updates and apps, building on the foundation to expand it. I suspect the GPS app to make it to America after a lot of hoopla for it.
I don't expect GT6 to be anything like a sleeper hit, but there's a good chance it will continue to attract attention over time as features are added, some as teasers of what to expect in GT7 on that monster Playstation.
)
- 4,878
- CoolColJ, GTP_CoolColJ
standard car (truck) shown at 3:15
http://www.craveonline.com/gaming/articles/604959-gran-turismo-6-launch-at-willow-springs-raceway
http://www.craveonline.com/gaming/articles/604959-gran-turismo-6-launch-at-willow-springs-raceway
Similar threads
