They look exactly the same as GT5's like i feared...![]()
I would be satisfied with the 400 premiums already, and prefer not to have PS2 era models screwing up my immersion in a 2013 game.Yeah, looks like most standards woll be exactly the same as before. Too bad they didn't atleast outsource smoothing them a little and upscaling textures.
But I still prefer to have them as standards than not having them at all.
To put this more in context, GT games hype has always exceeded the result. This is where surprises get muted, but that's not to say there aren't great things... But more times than not people are like "interesting, they did that in a strange way" vs other products that go for the "finally! The feature we have all been looking forward to has finally arrived and it's what we expected".
There have been many "moon rover" type things that make us go "wtf?! Don't get me wrong but..." In the GT series.
thx for posting! what about this standard car on the video?
View attachment 82940
So because someone didn't mention standards at all, and that confirms that standards are not very well done? Can you please give us your thoughts on the Course Maker, Car Customization, new tire and suspension modeling that also weren't mentioned? What about the 1190 cars he didn't drive, any reviews?
VS GT5
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
no, they dont look awfull because you really cant tell with those unsharp pictures.They look as awfull as they did in GT5. Very disappointing.
...What?The most importante things is the driving physics, because in gt5 standards were easier and less interesting to drive compared to premium, I hope physic will be the same for all cars...
Before GT PSP, when did hype ever exceed the result? Fine if you don't want to count the first, but GT2, 3, and 4 stood up to the hype quite well. They're fantastic games and I don't think any of us would disagree. But just because PD's last two efforts were poor, we're rewriting history...