- 5,814
- Hillsboro Oregon
- XDesperado67
- XDesperado67
Sounds good, also love the idea of some budget shootouts. Make the tuners have to put cars together on some sort of limited budget.
Sounds good, also love the idea of some budget shootouts. Make the tuners have to put cars together on some sort of limited budget.
Wasn't there something like this floating around a few months back? I seem to recall Onboy having something to do with it.
This is something I haven't seen since the GT4 tuner contests. It encourages a wider variety of cars than the format we're using now. 👍All that would matter is the improvement above the stock lap times (on the mandated tires of course).
The Crap Car Contest (CCC)
Sounds good.👍👍Would be a little complicated but one approach would be a before and after contest to see who improved their car the most with the upgrades. You would mandate tire selection, transmission and LSD to allow full tuning, but the rest is limited to $XXXXX. With this approach no one has a lap time advantage in picking the best car, nor do outright lap times matter. All that would matter is the improvement above the stock lap times (on the mandated tires of course).
Now that's a true tuning shootout as it focuses entirely on the benefit of the tune, as opposed to the outright speed of the final result, which in large part, is also determined by PD. You'd have to have a PP range to work in because the gains at 300 pp will be different than 600pp but if you picked say 400-500 stock pp and went from there I think that would work. Two divisions would be cool as well, say 400-450 and 450-500.
The winner will be the one who best selects parts to improve performance combined with their tuning abilities, which encompasses the full range of tuning input. Tuning a car with unlimited parts to choose from is one thing, but selecting the right parts to maximize performance under a given limit and tuning those parts is what tuning is all about.
Bring it on!Hi,
if you're struggeling to find a new theme to work on you could try the one I just did with a few mates:
The Crap Car Contest (CCC)
Try to design the tune with the worst handling. Only restriction is that the car must match exactly 450pp. The tuner with the highest avg. time is going to make the match while the aim of the testers will remain to achive best times.
Track might be Trial Mountain.
Hey Roj you have as much authority around this Zoo as anyone does.This is something I haven't seen since the GT4 tuner contests. It encourages a wider variety of cars than the format we're using now. 👍
Don't let XDesperado see that, he'll go nuts with his conspiracy theories! I like the idea though, nice and fun contest to unwind a bit between serious contests.
Also I need to stop sounding like I have authority in here, sorry.
Hey Roj you have as much authority around this Zoo as anyone does.
Remember this is an organization of and for all the tuners and test drivers, I just have the fun of trying to keep this thread up to date and a semblance of order to it.
Finally CSLACR can you please give me a heads up on where you are at in regards to sponsoring your event?
I would like some input, from the testers and tuners about my idea for the shoot out. I originally came up with the idea breaking up the event into 3 categories based on price of the car (dont want to give out to much detail yet) and based on that price the car could be taken to a certain pp range. I brought this up to Desperado and he wondered would i allow the tuners to enter in more then one category. I said no just because i dont want to over load the testers assuming we get about 15-20 tuners. But will allow it depending on what i hear from you guys.
ryangt was pointed to a listing of all the cars in GT5 that includes the price for 0/0 cars that he plans to use for classing cars according to price, that way people can't gain a performance bennefit from getting a higher mileage car whose price has been reduced to just below the cutoff for a category.👍👍the idea behind you're setup sounds like fun , sadly we have limited options in gt5 to put a pricecap on a certain car .... for example a couple of thousand miles extra on a car would set the car a lot cheaper at the UCD ( this is how i have excperienced it tho i might be wrong ) meaning it would be based on luck as for who finds what .
If you got for example 400-500-600 pp classes you might end up with lets say 15 tuners and 12 of them chosing 500 pp leaving 3 divided in 2 other groups .
What you could do for example is , make it a standerd car event only with PP limitations , maybe even a buildyear limitation .
this way you might see a more diverse entryfield .
i will re-read this after i had some sleep incase it aint making sence at all .... nightshifts aint really helping
I would like some input, from the testers and tuners about my idea for the shoot out. I originally came up with the idea breaking up the event into 3 categories based on price of the car (dont want to give out to much detail yet) and based on that price the car could be taken to a certain pp range. I brought this up to Desperado and he wondered would i allow the tuners to enter in more then one category. I said no just because i dont want to over load the testers assuming we get about 15-20 tuners. But will allow it depending on what i hear from you guys.
The other idea Desperado threw around was expanding the price range of the cars allowed to enter from like 30k-100k. This would allow only one category. I am trying to make this as easy for everyone testers and tuners to have enough time to test the cars and post times. Please any feed back would be great this is the last detail i am working on for my shootout.
If you got for example 400-500-600 pp classes you might end up with lets say 15 tuners and 12 of them chosing 500 pp leaving 3 divided in 2 other groups.
The best way around this is to put all the tuners into a hat and randomly assign them to a group. Then you'll have an even distribution.
The best way around this is to put all the tuners into a hat and randomly assign them to a group. Then you'll have an even distribution.
The only problem I see with this is that some tuners may not agree with what they're given. Personally, I'd rather stay in the lower groups and tune something fun. If I was forced into the top group, I may feel a little discouraged and I probably wouldn't put my best into the tune.
What you could do is simply do it by a "first come, first serve" basis. We're expecting 15-20 people to enter right? Let's say you open 7 slots in each group and if the groups aren't evenly spread at the end of the sign-ups, then whoever were the last to join the most popular group gets shifted to the least popular groups, until it's spread evenly. It's still unfair, but it's unfair to less people I think.
The host could have a random set of numbers set up 10, 5, 2, 4, etc. and ask for sign ups. The first tuner to respond gets the first slot; #10 in the above. The second response gets slot #2; 5 in this case. The tuner that "draws" #1 picks his PP level first and so on. That might work?
That would work, kind of like a raffle.
That would work, kind of like a raffle.
Though I thought you said that, after the unfortunate car choice from the rally shootout, you wouldn't be participating in one of these 'you have no choice to pick your car' tuning things?
Though I thought you said that, after the unfortunate car choice from the rally shootout, you wouldn't be participating in one of these 'you have no choice to pick your car' tuning things?
More like drawing straws?
You'd still get to pick which car you'd want to tune in the PP category you have drawn.
When is dragonthing running their event?
Not a clue, work seems to be taking up a lot of her time these days.
Sponsor's for upcoming events listed in order of announcing intention to Sponsor an event.
Projected dates, Shootout names and details will be added as they become available.
Dragonthing's Luxury Concours D'Elegance (tentative event details not final)
What is her idea anyway? And off topic, but you has no job yet?