There’s some theories, but this takes the cake as the biggest load of garbage. Seriously?Who's Latifi's manager? Is he or she linked to anyone at Red Bull or Alpha Tauri? I'm not a tinfoil hat guy (vaccines, big stuff like that) but race fixing has happened before. Well, the FIA or Liberty definitely fixed the race but... The event that led to this was Latifi crashing. I'm just wondering if it could be another Crashgate a la Alonso/Piquet. Red Bull needed a miracle and they got it at the right time, just when the fresh Hard tyres plan was coming undone. I don't know, I'm just in disbelief. I think it would be good to see the telemetry on Latifi's car just to clear any suspicions.
I think Mercedes were betting on the race finishing under safety car. Only fault with Mercedes would be if they hadn't factored in a potential restart and that Max had the gap to pit for new tires.I get the continued moaning and groaning from both sides. However, no one is putting blame on Mercedes for not pitting Lewis and flipping the script. Even with Max 1 and Lewis 2, if Lewis has equal or fresher softs, he goes on to win, in this exact scenario, no? You'll have a hard time convincing me that's not possible (don't say Max will intentionally run Lewis off).
They wouldn't even have to sue, all they would have to do is seriously threaten to leave and it would bring the series to it's knees. It wouldn't be like Ferrari's empty threats either since the F1 team isn't a core part of their overall brand.God, I would love it if Mercedes actually sued. They could genuinely bring this mob down if they wanted.
Why would Lewis pit when there was no guarantee the race would actually return to green?I get the continued moaning and groaning from both sides. However, no one is putting blame on Mercedes for not pitting Lewis and flipping the script. Even with Max 1 and Lewis 2, if Lewis has equal or fresher softs, he goes on to win, in this exact scenario, no? You'll have a hard time convincing me that's not possible (don't say Max will intentionally run Lewis off).
Max is champion of nothing until the FIA prizegiving ceremony 6 days from now. The confirmation of the results is delayed to allow for any protests or disqualifications from the results of the last race.The problem is, regardless of having a case or not, they can’t strip Verstappen of the championship now, owing to the point that he hasn’t done anything wrong. If a rule has been broken to get this race finished on track, then there isn’t a subsequent rule or case to go along with it that has a suitable outcome. Not without turning it from farcical to a genuine joke by rewriting the WDC after a race control muck up.
They didn't want to risk a red flag or the race not restarting. If they pitted, RB would stay out and likely get ahead of Lewis on track. As I said at the time, it's a damned if they did or damned if they don't kind of situation. If they pitted and it stayed Safety Car to the end, they'd have thrown it away.I get the continued moaning and groaning from both sides. However, no one is putting blame on Mercedes for not pitting Lewis and flipping the script. Even with Max 1 and Lewis 2, if Lewis has equal or fresher softs, he goes on to win, in this exact scenario, no? You'll have a hard time convincing me that's not possible (don't say Max will intentionally run Lewis off).
Latifi, in the Williams-Mercedes?Who's Latifi's manager? Is he or she linked to anyone at Red Bull or Alpha Tauri? I'm not a tinfoil hat guy (vaccines, big stuff like that) but race fixing has happened before. Well, the FIA or Liberty definitely fixed the race but... The event that led to this was Latifi crashing. I'm just wondering if it could be another Crashgate a la Alonso/Piquet. Red Bull needed a miracle and they got it at the right time, just when the fresh Hard tyres plan was coming undone. I don't know, I'm just in disbelief. I think it would be good to see the telemetry on Latifi's car just to clear any suspicions.
Which would be fine under potential penalty circumstances. But this is a totally different thing. Neither team nor driver have done anything wrong for the results to be altered.Max is champion of nothing until the FIA prizegiving ceremony 6 days from now. The confirmation of the results is delayed to allow for any protests or disqualifications from the results of the last race.
It would be a mess, but the FIA could decide to take action if there’s a formal complaint.
Absolutely none of that “I’m neutral but” nonsense excuses the decision made it. It’s 1 way or the other, not conveniently only let the cars in between the title fighters by and then immediately go racing. Either it ends under SC or Max has to fight through the field in a much faster car than them.I get the continued moaning and groaning from both sides. However, no one is putting blame on Mercedes for not pitting Lewis and flipping the script. Even with Max 1 and Lewis 2, if Lewis has equal or fresher softs, he goes on to win, in this exact scenario, no? You'll have a hard time convincing me that's not possible (don't say Max will intentionally run Lewis off).
One good thing about this is it allows some fans here to show their true colors.There’s some theories, but this takes the cake as the biggest load of garbage. Seriously?
Yes but his point is you can't penalize Max because he did nothing wrong. So how do you give the title to HAM? It'd be an even bigger farce.Max is champion of nothing until the FIA prizegiving ceremony 6 days from now. The confirmation of the results is delayed to allow for any protests or disqualifications from the results of the last race.
It would be a mess, but the FIA could decide to take action if there’s a formal complaint.
And give up the lead with no guarantee it restarts?I get the continued moaning and groaning from both sides. However, no one is putting blame on Mercedes for not pitting Lewis and flipping the script. Even with Max 1 and Lewis 2, if Lewis has equal or fresher softs, he goes on to win, in this exact scenario, no? You'll have a hard time convincing me that's not possible (don't say Max will intentionally run Lewis off).
That Latifi, driving the Mercedes’ powered car that Toto Wolff owns shares in.Latifi, in the Williams-Mercedes?
I mean, it was commented on repeatedly at the time, but Mercedes didn't want to cede track position to Verstappen because... yeah, he'd intentionally run Hamilton off.However, no one is putting blame on Mercedes for not pitting Lewis and flipping the script. Even with Max 1 and Lewis 2, if Lewis has equal or fresher softs, he goes on to win, in this exact scenario, no? You'll have a hard time convincing me that's not possible (don't say Max will intentionally run Lewis off).
Agreed. One of the worst seasons I've ever seen. If this is the sport moving forward I'm done.Yeah... no.
We've seen technical and sporting regulations made up on the spot, dirty driving punished with a lack of consistency, the expansion of the calendar into yet more brutal regimes and safety procedure bypassed to get there, and a total validation of on- and off-track unsportsmanlike actions. And then there was the Belgian Grand Prix which was among the ****test things ever to happen in F1, ranking alongside the US Grand Prix in 2005 and... quite frankly the "race" we have just witnessed, though that only descended into farce late on after a reasonably tedious event.
To much of the F1-watching world, this entire season has looked like a concerted effort from the FIA to engineer a result. I can't disagree that it looks really bad.
Though thankfully we've had no absolute plane crashes, despite best efforts.
Yeah....that's the way to take a corner cleanly! SMH!I mean, it was commented on repeatedly at the time, but Mercedes didn't want to cede track position to Verstappen because... yeah, he'd intentionally run Hamilton off.
It's all very well saying "dOn'T sAy MaX wIlL iNtEnTiOnAlLy RuN lEwIs OfF", but it's an entirely genuine concern given that it's happened seven times this season already, including lap one of this race:
View attachment 1099091
And of course you'll have a hard time being convinced of it if you just shut down that entire concept going into the discussion. It's like saying "you'll have a hard time convincing me that attempted murder is wrong (and don't say people have the right not to be murdered)" - but then that's Jos, rather than Max, Verstappen.
MotoGP should be at Japan in and around the same time. With a bit of luck.I also planned to go to the Japanese GP in 2022, but I’d rather take my time and enjoy other forms of racing.
Yeah. People were dismissing Crashgate in the same manner in F1fanatic.net before the scandal blew up. And it ended up being real. I'm not saying that Latifi did it on purpose, and I'm not a conspiracy theorist, so even if there's the slightest evidence that no foul play happened from his end I'd be happy to accept that. Plus as I said the corrupt ones here were Masi and perhaps Liberty. But asking a couple of questions such as to how Latifi lost his car in that turn when he was at the back not racing for anything seems sensible to me. After all race fixing in such an unbelievable manner, and I was one of the ones saying surely not when rumours first emerged of 08's Crahsgate. It's just that. What I do think that makes this particular scenario highly, highly unlikely is that they're not even running in the same team which is why I asked if there was some tie to Red Bull management.There’s some theories, but this takes the cake as the biggest load of garbage. Seriously?
So, not a Braves fan anymore either?So, with this season and the manufacturing of the results, I’m keeping distance from anything involved with Libery Media.
The FIA is hard to dodge in terms of racing, but it’s safe to say I won’t be watching live F1 much until things clearly change.
I also planned to go to the Japanese GP in 2022, but I’d rather take my time and enjoy other forms of racing.
One of the worst seasons… come on manAgreed. One of the worst seasons I've ever seen. If this is the sport moving forward I'm done.