You claim state facts yet refuse to show any evidence of where you got them. As far as anyone should be concerned, this topic isn't worth debating with you until you do so. You're already wrong, no one needs to waste their time here providing why if you won't provide proof otherwise.
I'll humor myself.
That's a huge load of crap, but I'll entertain the claim. Proof?
You said it sells well overseas. Overseas does not mean the Middle East & South Africa alone. The car doesn't sell well at all in Europe, Asia, or Australia. Thus, from your logic, I'm just as correct in stating it does not sell well overseas.
The main problem here is that you're talking about muscle cars, most likely of the old era. The Mustang has never been a muscle car & the V8 is not what makes it so iconic. It's a cheap, affordable, sports coupe. That's what people want, the image of a Mustang as evident by the number of young adults who buy one & end up with the V6; they just want to say they own a Mustang.
You said it was represented as a new car. Now, you back tracked & are talking about grey imports.
That doesn't mean squat & that's why you believe they sell every car imported. Dur, that's because most grey imports are bought
before they are imported. Thus, makes it pretty hard to have
excess inventory (or
any inventory for that matter) on the lots if the cars can't be brought in without being purchased by an owner in the first place.
No one cares what your relative & his V8 circle jerk group thinks.