Physics are almost everything to me -- I still play good old Enthusia, while my interest in the latest racing games comes and goes -- but a good physics engine won't make up for a lack of tracks/cars, or else I'd still be playing Live for Speed like I used to. Tracks are the big thing, and I'm not impressed with FM5's offerings. The number of cars seems fine, though I wish they would have kept/added more and focused less on pumping extreme detail into them.If people can be disappointed in this game with car physics as fun as these, you're in the wrong hobby.
^ Not to mention that they would have to laser scan and recreate a 20km long track.
I completely agree with you Mclaren, no doubt. Although, I still believe that T10 should've delayed FM5 a year just to finish some stuff that needed finishing, so they wouldn't have gained the crap they have now.The Nurburgring debate has its merits, but I'm cutting T10 slack. The track has been a recycled PGR2 model & everyone knows its virtually remained unchanged in its inaccuracies for a long, long time. It having a 2-month delay from the game's launch just leads me, in my view, to believe they just underestimated the time or had certain walls they ran into trying to model a completely brand new version. It most likely being DLC is going to be a hard pill to swallow, but if it lives up to GT's, I'll more than likely bite the bullet to finally have a proper Nurburgring on the Xbox.
I've noticed this too, and it's usually the fifth curse for racing games. The community features I'm very surprised was taken out.I'm currently reading the official FM.net forums. Seems to be a lot of mixed reactions. More negative than positive impressions though or so it appears at least - mainly due to MT, DLC, lack of community features and few tracks. Fifth game curse?
I don't want to, but I agree judging by what was left out. I rest the blame on MS though, as I'm sure they wanted something other than NFS Rivals as a launch title racing game.I completely agree with you Mclaren, no doubt. Although, I still believe that T10 should've delayed FM5 a year just to finish some stuff that needed finishing, so they wouldn't have gained the crap they have now.
Agreed, basically they wanted a sim racer and a arcade racer for their system at launch it seems.I don't want to, but I agree judging by what was left out. I rest the blame on MS though, as I'm sure they wanted something other than NFS Rivals as a launch title racing game.
He has to be, to the point he'll probably want to leave MS. I know I would if I was pushed. :\Wonder if Dan is pissed they made his team push out FM5 much earlier than he wanted?
I don't think he's that kind of guy to be honest.He has to be, to the point he'll probably want to leave MS. I know I would if I was pushed. :\
You're probably right.I don't think Dan is that disappointed. I'm sure the paycheck MS gives him & his staff is enough to keep him around. The only way to go from here is to continue making improvements through updates. Who knows? They may just change some things around in a week or 2.
Of course. Just like @McLaren said, they'll be updating the game.T10 are very busy updating the game. The self entitlement grows by the year doesn't it.
You should be thankful you have something worthwhile to play at launch.
True. 👍 If it was EA however, run.I don't think he's that kind of guy to be honest.
Nothing to be thankful for. Forza has never been a launch title and I feel FM5 is showing why that has been the case.You should be thankful you have something worthwhile to play at launch.
Nothing to be thankful for. Forza has never been a launch title and I feel FM5 is showing why that has been the case.
If there was no FM5, would you have an xbone?I'd rather have FM5 than nothing if I owned a Xbox One. I don't think the content is bad value in general at this time.
If there was no FM5, would you have an xbone?
I care about the cars@HELLAFLUSH240SX
You say it's not an attachment yet you keep complaining about the number of cars as if it shapes the overall game, you don't talk about the improved HUD, or the physics due to the XB1 or the updated AI and other features that were updated. You purely seem to care about numbers (doesn't matter how many times you say you dont), there have been many actual software workers on this forum that have explained the numbers of GT5/GT6. Secondly this is the first time I know of that T10 has got to do Blu-ray, and from what they've told the public rather than doing ports like they and others have done, they rather give better quality. Nurb as far as FM went wasn't great and I'm glad they took it out to do it correctly. I don't think we should be given a product that isn't constantly up to date and just ported over and cleaned up.
No one says those "20" enable you from talking about the count, but you only put your foot in your mouth when you go on this tangent about me not knowing your car history and then you prove me right by saying you in fact haven't driven every car. You further perpetuate this by saying that you driven a portion of those 670 to great lengths and the others not so much. Point is FM is trying to move into the world of being a true sim.
I care about the cars
What? I'm just saying a lot of the cars I enjoyed in Forza 4 didn't make the cut. It's a shame.Meaning? You care so much yet it's an injustice to cross manufacture specs, that's a true car enthusiasts right there I guess I've been doing it wrong all these years
What? I'm just saying a lot of the cars I enjoyed in Forza 4 didn't make the cut. It's a shame.
The words of critics should always be welcome. If people don't like what's going on here, they should say so. Maybe it will prevent it from happening again.T10 are very busy updating the game. The self entitlement grows by the year doesn't it. You should be thankful you have something worthwhile to play at launch.
Hear hear!T10 are very busy updating the game. The self entitlement grows by the year doesn't it. You should be thankful you have something worthwhile to play at launch.
The value is pretty extreme for these special games GT and Forza. To update them is an enormous task that keeps growing.
PS3 had GT HD at launch, one track and like 10 cars. GT5p was hardly a game which came out 1-1.5 years after. GT5 came out 4 years after PS3 launched, and was made to look like poor value compared to Forza.
Maybe wait a few months and grab FM5 at half price?
I'd really wait till Forza 6 before calling BS
I'd say Autovista has proved itself, imo. If T10 hadn't been so centered around creating more vehicles to showcase for it, I think we'd be stuck with some of the same FM2/FM3 models to date. That's a big plus in my book. Fans have been asking for updated models for years now, so it's good to see T10 delivered on 1 front.The words of critics should always be welcome. If people don't like what's going on here, they should say so. Maybe it will prevent it from happening again.
I'm ready to vote down any attempt at Autovista from ever showing up again because it's a waste of resources as far as I'm concerned, even if I understand why they'd put it in the game.
I wouldn't really compare GT HD or GT5P to FM5 though. The first was very clearly a demo and was even free. 5P was never meant to be a full game, and even full GT5, while it took a while doesn't seem to by a "typical" case.