UKMikey
Premium
- 18,112
- Grea'er Laandan
- UKMikeyA
- UKMikeyA
I think the Games Radar review is a pretty fair piece of work and I'm not really sure how he can be getting so much hate when the overwhelming majority haven't played the game yet. He tells us what, in his opinion, is good about the game and what is less good. Isn't that what he's supposed to do?
They give Driveclub a 9 at launch with so many problems (Driveclub is a good game now). Man for the content alone this game deserves a 8 atleast. Lets be honest if Driveclub is A 9 at launch this game is 10.I think the Games Radar review is a pretty fair piece of work and I'm not really sure how he can be getting so much hate when the overwhelming majority haven't played the game yet. He tells us what, in his opinion, is good about the game and what is less good. Isn't that what he's supposed to do?
They give Driveclub a 9 at launch with so many problems (Driveclub is a good game now). Man for the content alone this game deserves a 8 atleast. Lets be honest if Driveclub is A 9 at launch this game is 10.
Maybe that guy likes broken games 💡.The same guy gave Project Cars a 3.5/5, Driveclub a 4.5/5 and Forza 6 a 3/5.
Agenda confirmed:
You can still see the article in search engines:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=gamesradar watch forza 6 disrespect its pixelated gaming elders&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=gamesradar watch forza 6 disrespect its pixelated gaming elders&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=b0fd0b385bad4e0fa49eb6476ff52620
It was however removed from their website.
http://www.gamesradar.com/forza-6-retro-commercial/
Do you mean the bing link he provided? Because the old article is very much still in evidence in some of the links.
yeah thnxDo you mean the bing link he provided? Because the old article is very much still in evidence in some of the links.
Not sure whether it's some kind of attempt at edgy humour or evidence of a genuine anti FM agenda but there you go.
They give Driveclub a 9 at launch with so many problems (Driveclub is a good game now). Man for the content alone this game deserves a 8 atleast. Lets be honest if Driveclub is A 9 at launch this game is 10.
What he thinks forza is lacking is just so small vs what the other games lack.Maybe they prefer Arcade games to Simcade? Also from what i remember with DC review code worked perfectly fine it was once the public got their hands on it the servers could not cope.
Still even in today's Driveclub it's a 7.5 at best But we all know these gaming websites get backhanders and privileges which has a huge effect on scores
What he thinks forza is lacking is just so small vs what the other games lack.
This is the funniest part of the review:
"I somehow managed to roll my car on a straight because it waggled under acceleration, which grew more violent before turning into a spin, which tipped over and barrelled for some 50m." - Gamesradar
I want to see the replay of this.
BTW this is the same website that re-reviewed Driveclub after DLC and patches and went from a 8/10 to 9/10... that's right they re-reviewed a post-launch game.
They have yet to re-review Forza 5 or Project Cars.
I think he means something like this lol
I don't think the circumstance would have ended up any different then what was shown in the video.Nope, he is describing a situation in which as his car accelerates it continues to "wag" until it finally spins and flips.
That video is someone purposely flipping.
If all weighed equal and without that review it would be a 94 right now on metacritic.... that's why.
I don't think the circumstance wouldn't have ended up any different then what was shown in the video.
Who cares?
It happens. If you know that that would be the score without that review, then you can rest easy since it achieves the number you deem acceptable.
I want to see how a car randomly starts to wag until eventually flipping just be accelerating in a straight line.
It was probably more of the reaction of the aids giving him grip that threw him over. Going by the casualness of the reviewer, I would say that the same situation happened.The video that was posted was someone that drove in a straight line, he even became stable before reach the grass and he purposely braked as hard as he could and turned to cause a flip.
Still even in today's Driveclub it's a 7.5 at best But we all know these gaming websites get backhanders and privileges which has a huge effect on scores
If all weighed equal and without that review it would be a 94 right now on metacritic.... that's why.
Then what's to prevent Microsoft or Turn 10 from doing the same, thus tainting the review score for FM6?
This is the thing that always gets me whenever review scores are criticized and I'm not directing this toward you: whenever a game someone doesn't like for whatever reason gets a higher score than they'd give it, it obviously means they were paid off. Whenever a game that's critically acclaimed gets a lower score it means someone has a vendetta.
They're called opinions and surprisingly enough they're subjective.
I think your numbers are wrong tbh, I'm not 100% sure as I can't be bothered adding them together, but that many 90's just doesn't average a 94 in my my guestimates. Anyway, that's beside the point also. How does that effect your enjoyment of the final game? As Mr. Slim pointed out.
They might be subjective but every game should be reviewed to the same standard, this reviewer in particular hasn't shared this standard with all its reviews. Re-reviewing Driveclub being the most stand-out thing and sketchiest thing they've done. It also doesn't help when they put out an article criticizing a Forza ad that was redacted and knock the game for some very off the wall stuff.
Who actually cares? Is it going to affect your purchase of the game? Is it going to affect your enjoyment of the game? Is it going to affect anything regarding you and the game?
And re-reviewing Driveclub is far from sketchy as it was fundamentally an entirely different game compared to its launch status. In fact, updating reviews of any kind when there's enough justification to do so is a fairly common practice in journalism.
That's your retort? I don't need to extend the discussion beyond your own feelings on the matter? Are we ignoring that you're the one inserting this nonsense onto everyone else's opinion on the matter by shamelessly white-knighting?