Sounds a bit "trumpet-y" to me. I dunno if that's exactly how it will sound in the car with the full exhaust system and under load, but at this moment I prefer the Valkyrie's V12 sound more.
Definitely one of the greatest sounding road car engines ever though, along with LFA and Carrera GT.
Who cars about the lap times? That's not the point of the car. That wasn't the point of the F1 either. Even discussing it completely misses the point of Murray's vision and the entire concept of road-legal sports cars.Would love to see a hot shoe like Dario in the T50 in a heads up race with a 720s around goodwood. The 720S is a seriously fast car, so I'm not sure the T50 would be able to keep up, but it would be awesome to watch I think.
Who cars about the lap times? That's not the point of the car. That wasn't the point of the F1 either. Even discussing it completely misses the point of Murray's vision and the entire concept of road-legal sports cars.
Dang, Man. Too cool.
Imagine going through all this for a Mazda 2? Love it.
I actually think this is a problem with like every modern car at the moment. Everyone seems to be obsessed with putting as low profile tires and the widest rims on everything from family hatchbacks to supercars, and I really think most of them would look better if they would just re-introduce a bit of sidewall. Seeing the F1 and the T50 right next to each-other perfectly highlights this. Another really good example is the ND mx5, where the base model has 15 inch rims and the higher end ones have 16 inch rims (at least here in Australia) and to me, the base model looks noticeably better.Even the thicker tires look more appropriate somehow. I think the T50's tire sidewalls are way too thin for their width.
I want to see a comparison of this vs a Mclaren F1 back to back. The most legendary sports car ever compared to a modern interpretation which may become legendary in itself, both extremely capable and surprisingly usable every day. Two completely different engine philosophies though, the F1 had a big fat torquey engine while the T50 is small, high rpm, and torque filled with technology.
Also the F1 will always be better looking, that's just a fact.
The family resemblance is undeniable but the F1 just has better proportions in various ways. Even the thicker tires look more appropriate somehow. I think the T50's tire sidewalls are way too thin for their width.
Here in the States the standard ND wheels are 17. It looks fine but it's not what I would do.I actually think this is a problem with like every modern car at the moment. Everyone seems to be obsessed with putting as low profile tires and the widest rims on everything from family hatchbacks to supercars, and I really think most of them would look better if they would just re-introduce a bit of sidewall. Seeing the F1 and the T50 right next to each-other perfectly highlights this. Another really good example is the ND mx5, where the base model has 15 inch rims and the higher end ones have 16 inch rims (at least here in Australia) and to me, the base model looks noticeably better.
I agree that it looks better but it strikes me that the F1 looks so tiny in comparison.I want to see a comparison of this vs a Mclaren F1 back to back. The most legendary sports car ever compared to a modern interpretation which may become legendary in itself, both extremely capable and surprisingly usable every day. Two completely different engine philosophies though, the F1 had a big fat torquey engine while the T50 is small, high rpm, and torque filled with technology.
Also the F1 will always be better looking, that's just a fact.
The family resemblance is undeniable but the F1 just has better proportions in various ways. Even the thicker tires look more appropriate somehow. I think the T50's tire sidewalls are way too thin for their width.
Top Gear magazine ride along the T.50 on the track and on the road
It's an amazing machine
I think that's all in the styling. The F1's styling graphics are all a little bit more proportional and it looks like a tightly packaged small sports car which it is. The T50 looks a little bit...looser? The front intakes are lower and smaller, the highlights are massive and really far apart, the wheels are huge with rubberband tires. It's only 3 inches longer and 1 inch wider than the F1.I agree that it looks better but it strikes me that the F1 looks so tiny in comparison.
Completely unrelated, y’all’s highways out here are no better quality than Ohio. And these drivers struck me as being in less of a hurry and with better lane discipline than Ohio. I just drove from San Fransisco to Monterey. That has nothing to do with the T50.T.33 > F1 > T.50
One odd thing about the T.50 for me is the wheels. They look so...ordinary. Like wheels you could pick out of the Koenig catalog. The F1 wheels were a little plain too, but they at least didn't look like medium tier aftermarket wheels. The T.33 Spider at least has an OEM-tier design.
As far as tires, I think rubberband tires are a symptom of automotive journalists, who frequently only use cars under ideal circumstances like race tracks, particularly with sports cars, incessantly moaning about bodyroll and small diamtere wheels purely out of aesthetics. So car manufacturers have progressively stiffened the ride on sports cars over the last 3 decades, and with it the sidewalls have shrunk. I just put some 650bx48 real-chonky-bois on my gravel bike, because I love me some suppleness so you know where I stand.