- 309
- Hoofddorp
- Maddens_Raiders
Gran Turismo forever
I’m not against people enjoying VGTs at all, to each their own.I for one, like the VGT dimension because it ventures into design. But I am utterly disappointed that Kaz is unable to discuss this monumental cornerstone in motorsport with any substance and credibility.
You can't really compare the last 3 months or so to the rest when it comes to updates.. They may have released less to save more for the spec II release which they act like is 3-6 months of content but it only takes a few hours of gameplay smhYou don't mention that while you are still selling the current game. And you do not mention the length of support for that game either, especially when it is connected to the support for its content. Buy GT7, because our new game will be out in 2 years time!
For me, the slow down of additional content each month, even compared to GT Sport, is an indication that they are working on the next game. Whether that will be on the PS5 or Sony's next console is anyone's guess. I personally think the next game only being on the PS5 would be a very hard sell. Without an increase in the technology of what a new console brings, what would they next GT offer over GT7 with the same technology running it. Seemingly gone are the days of significant software improvements during the lifetime of a console. Is the PS5 offering a massive difference to most GT players than GT7 on PS4!
I really hope PD's idea of "big update" isn't just another set of time trials.Besides, we’re not even 2 years into the game’s life cycle yet. IIRC, the Lewis Hamilton DLC dropped right around the 2 year mark in GTS. I fully expect PD/Sony to do the same thing, and my expectation is that it would be heavily PS5-focused. I honestly do think the best of GT7 is yet to come.
That is what everyone said after GT Sport, and look what we have! And they don't seem to know, or are interested in, how they have ****** this up. Giving them a pass on this game could really impact on them in the future. They could easily fix a lot of the problems now, but they either don't see problems, and if they do, they have chosen to do very little about them.
Sophy being ready or not has nothing to do with the basic design of the game. It is not too late to fix it, but if they wait how many years till the next game, I for one will be way past caring. If they don't see the problems now, in all likelihood that next game would be the same, or make even worse, because eh, they sold x million games.
I think I'm taking 'new' challenges too...😒This is the discussion thread for an article on GTPlanet:
Gran Turismo is “Taking on New Challenges”, says Kazunori Yamauchi
The Gran Turismo franchise has changed a lot over the past 25 years. From breaking ground as a “the real driving simulator” with realistic cars and driving physics to growing into an esports platform, the series has come to attract a wide range of people for many different reasons...
Because, from the perspective of Kaz and PD, it is a noteworthy achievement. They've got around 40 brands to design cars specifically for a game, and then some of these brands have arranged to produce full scale models for display. Has any other game made this happen, in any genre of gaming? - I've no idea if anyone else has!I find it pretty strange Kaz thinks of VGT as a noteworthy achievement for the franchise to mention in the larger context of the franchise.
I used to like the direction he provided for gran turismo but comments like this make me cringe. Maybe he’s more marketeer now than racer.
And what is the purpose of reaching this goal ?if the goal is to increase visibility among major brands, then it is probably successful
The things wrong with the single player game is not only the AI in the game, they are things that could be fixed by a redesign of the game, and content added, and by that I mean challenges rather than cars and tracks, which are always welcome of course.I think you are wrong here, sophy is proably one of the reasons why pd still has not bothered much with single player,
Great that you think Sophy may be the answer to a lot of the ills of the game, I don't. I want this game improved, at the moment I don't care about the next game, however many years away that is. This was supposed to be the return to a 'proper' GT game, and it has not been. Imho. You may think differently. And that's fine.i can easily see sophy as full feature in next game With maybe the return of gt league with qualifying in the the races, if you dont care thats on you, but then why bringing it up that dosen’t make any sense,
Some flaws is an understatement imho. This is the 7th version of the game, and it shouldn't be a game talking about potential. They have messed up the basic core of the game.gt7 has some flaws, mainly single player, economy, but pontential has never been better in the franshise,
There seemed to be a lot more content released for GT Sport, and maybe that was because of the perceived lack of content and backlash from the players, but for me the extra content so far has been mostly disappointing. I hope they keep bringing extra content, and that can transform the game. We'll see.You can't really compare the last 3 months or so to the rest when it comes to updates.. They may have released less to save more for the spec II release which they act like is 3-6 months of content but it only takes a few hours of gameplay smh
The things wrong with the single player game is not only the AI in the game, they are things that could be fixed by a redesign of the game, and content added, and by that I mean challenges rather than cars and tracks, which are always welcome of course.
Great that you think Sophy may be the answer to a lot of the ills of the game, I don't. I want this game improved, at the moment I don't care about the next game, however many years away that is. This was supposed to be the return to a 'proper' GT game, and it has not been. Imho. You may think differently. And that's fine.
Some flaws is an understatement imho. This is the 7th version of the game, and it shouldn't be a game talking about potential. They have messed up the basic core of the game.
There seemed to be a lot more content released for GT Sport, and maybe that was because of the perceived lack of content and backlash from the players, but for me the extra content so far has been mostly disappointing. I hope they keep bringing extra content, and that can transform the game. We'll see.
I mean,they already were a advertising platform for car brands 20 years ago...Taking on new challenges such as becoming a legitimate advertising platform for luxury brands.
Which was closer to car lovers wanting a game where you drive cool cars, than those Bulgari and Dior partnerships which 99.99% of player do not care about.I mean,they already were a advertising platform for car brands 20 years ago...
How is it insulting? No where is it worded as "unjustified" criticism. its just stating facts.yahh, so true... and this comment from the article ""with complaints of both a shallow singler-player mode from one group of players,"" is insulting! Players have a right to complain about the shallow SP mode and demand more given that the (dishonest) pre launch marketing heralded GT7 as a "return to roots Gran Turismo" - that had old skoolers so excited... What a lie!
Some don't, but we're talking about a small number of them, and they don't need to race against each other provided there's other cars in the game for them to race against, which mostly there are - but this isn't really any different to the non-VGT car selection.The limits and framework most of the non Gr cars have is that they have bee designed to fit a niche in the market, and have been designed to 'compete' in the real world market against each other, and so a similar in design, power, weight and performance so that they can be used to race against each other. Some the VGT cars have nothing close in terms of power and performance.
I don't disagree with this sentiment, but if we're accepting that car additions are finite, then making two of each class will halve the variety coming to the game. It's personal preference, but I'd rather have the variety than not have something representative of some manufacturer, class, series, culture or fandom. I completely understand why people would want the opposite, in an ideal world we'd have more of both.One of the things that really p's me off is when they bring a new car, or should I say vehicle, is that they bring one version of that type of vehicle, and least bring two for some variety and racing opportunity's. If you bring an ambulance, bring at least two different option. Try something different, but two or more matched options.
Regarding the bolded bit, again, this isn't something specific to the VGT's, it's true of every car in the game. Regards them being too different to each other, why do all VGT's have to be the same? A Valkyrie is nothing like a DB3S, a Super Formula car is nothing like a Willy's Jeep.My argument against the VGT is not that they are blocking another type of car from being introduced, which they obviously are, as they have said they are limited by how many new cars they can produce, no, it is that they are too different to each other.
Again, I don't mind this as a concept, but it's not what VGT is... that's more like the PD developed Gr.3 & 4 cars (which still see people whinging). VGT is more about designers being giving the freedom to express themselves without some of the constraints they have with production cars, and different manufacturers have used that opportunity different ways.Something similar to the proposed Hypercar and Grand Touring Prototype (GTP) Championship, where numerous aspects of the design for the new class would be kept open, with a free engine architecture and the freedom to run any number of cylinders with the choice of a Turbo Charged or Naturally Aspirated engine. Hybrid system are allowed. But there are some fixed design elements for weigh and size. Some cars are based of road legal hyper car designs. The cars I saw that were potentially competing in that were varied, but designed to race each other. And that should at least be the point for cars in a racing game.
If someone, or a company, is told many times, from many people, that there are multiple things wrong with their product, and they do little, but more often nothing, about the majority of the problems (for many years) they have been informed about, unless you are told why they can't fix the problems, or why they decided to make those decisions, you can only surmise that they may not care.How is it insulting? No where is it worded as "unjustified" criticism. its just stating facts.
I cant say I know how the process of making and maintaining GT7 is done, and people should be encouraged to through criticism polyphony's way. However, considering 99.9% of us are not flies on the wall and can only ever wish to be... I would hope many of us would refrain from personally attacking Kaz and his crew for apparently not caring about fans and now not caring about making games. I get it can look that way from a certain perspective, but making games has be very difficult, otherwise GT would have competition pass it long ago, but they have not.
what is the most difficult to nail ? fleshing the single player with decent amount and variety of events ? Setting a decent economy so players don't have to lose their souls in order to obtain credits ?but making games has be very difficult, otherwise GT would have competition pass it long ago, but they have not.