Scaff
Moderator
- 29,443
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
I am only talking about console versions.Would that ranking change if you were only talking about console versions?
I am only talking about console versions.Would that ranking change if you were only talking about console versions?
I am only talking about console versions.
GTS is not bad next to Pro Cars, if you haven't sorted out the force feedback in the latter. Not in any alternative universe is it comparable to AC..Ok thanks man.
So you don't rate GTS at all then?
love it!
edit: more gifs from SunshiLegend: http://gamingbolt.com/ps4-exclusive-gran-turismo-sport-looks-absolutely-breathtaking-in-these-gifs
love it!
edit: more gifs from SunshiLegend: http://gamingbolt.com/ps4-exclusive-gran-turismo-sport-looks-absolutely-breathtaking-in-these-gifs
LOL Exactly what I wrote minutes ago in "my home forum"! 👍 TV commercial like... only a logo and slogan are missing at the end!that gif is like a movie scene
or a car ad
At this present moment in time I have some major concerns with it.Ok thanks man.
So you don't rate GTS at all then?
Yes, you are free to make all the mistakes you like. I merely pointing out that the discussion was merely about some specific sections of trees, but your response didn't specify trees, it said, "guys saying GTS looks bad" when no one was saying that. But carry on.Well in a discussion on an open forum in the free world I can say what I like, within legal reason. Freedom is a lovely thing.
Also, my point was relevant, and still stands - DC has great trees and lots of other great stuff because of 30fps.
Also, separately, if you're used to high end PC graphics, you're more likely, I'd suggest, to find GTS disappointing. It was phrased as a question because I didn't want to appear like I was making a statement of fact. That's a trifle annoying on a forum. IMHO.
Good to chat again Johnny!
Also, @glassjaw - nailed it
Yes, you are free to make all the mistakes you like. I merely pointing out that the discussion was merely about some specific sections of trees, but your response didn't specify trees, it said, "guys saying GTS looks bad" when no one was saying that. But carry on.
Must have missed it then. Got a link?I mentioned trees first.
But thanks for the policing anyway.
Always a pleasure.
Well, that's certainly a first for Gran Turismo.Don't know if it has been posted here already, but apart getting cracks in the headlight glass, you can also break them completely.
View attachment 641873
love it!
edit: more gifs from SunshiLegend: http://gamingbolt.com/ps4-exclusive-gran-turismo-sport-looks-absolutely-breathtaking-in-these-gifs
At this present moment in time I have some major concerns with it.
i dont know... i guess ill prefer a clean picture during racing and some blur and other effects in replays! the black borders need to go too (as seen in the menus before replay)!It looks only due to the motion blur like a movie, I hope they give Pro users the options to enable it in gameplay. Since the pre race screen also runs at 60fps+motion blur. It makes things just look way more real.
One will be. XxxWould be interested to hear more in-depth about it...
An article incoming?
The handling in GT is perfect for me as a pad player. It's the only racing game that I enjoy 100% with a pad. But for a good handling and a beautiful presentation, there are plenty of old flaws. Those flaws were acceptable in the 2000's, not anymore IMO.I can totally understand preferring Assetto Corsa as a sim but I don't think I would put PCars in the conversation personally.
However I think people expecting GT to be trying to do the same thing are just very much mistaken, it has to be playable and fun with a pad and for many millions more players than the games it is being compared to, of course it is going to be towards the sim-cade side of things.
I'd guess that a lot of people feel that it can both be optimized for pad driving and the 7 to 77 crowd, while at the same time leaning more towards the simulation side of things than it already does. Physics aside, people are also going to compare features and have individual preferences there as well. Some will take the enhanced graphics, for example, while some would have preferred full weather/TOD transitions and slightly lower graphics fidelity etc. It's a much more nuanced discussion than simply expecting the games to do the "same thing".I can totally understand preferring Assetto Corsa as a sim but I don't think I would put PCars in the conversation personally.
However I think people expecting GT to be trying to do the same thing are just very much mistaken, it has to be playable and fun with a pad and for many millions more players than the games it is being compared to, of course it is going to be towards the sim-cade side of things.
Sunhi doing God's work