GT Sport - Trailers, Videos and Screenshots

  • Thread starter sk8er913
  • 17,667 comments
  • 2,116,747 views
Clearly in the 'computer generated car model moving through a picture' stakes it's not trash (it's not quite as revolutionary as some make out but still impressive), however, in many other ways some people think it is.
Yeah I've never seen that technique used in a video game or anywhere before, it's mind blowing and amazing to me.

Listen, I can understand if you don't enjoy GT/GT Sport for the driving or what not but people constantly give it crap for reasons that have no merit whatsoever. Just annoys me man. The lack of campaign like we used to have I can get but then again we haven't experienced it for ourselves properly yet and people are already writing the game off. That's what grinds my gears.
 
Yeah I've never seen that technique used in a video game or anywhere before, it's mind blowing and amazing to me.

Listen, I can understand if you don't enjoy GT/GT Sport for the driving or what not but people constantly give it crap for reasons that have no merit whatsoever. Just annoys me man. The lack of campaign like we used to have I can get but then again we haven't experienced it for ourselves properly yet and people are already writing the game off. That's what grinds my gears.
It grinds your gears when people don't like things they hear about a video game before it's released? That's a little odd don't you think?
 
It grinds your gears when people don't like things they hear about a video game before it's released? That's a little odd don't you think?
I never said it's what people hear. What annoys me is when people give the game crap and what they say has no merit.

If you don't like the game for legitmate reasons, that's all good.

People shouldn't write a game off until they've at least tried it.
 
I never said it's what people hear. What annoys me is when people give the game crap and what they say has no merit.

If you don't like the game for legitmate reasons, that's all good.

People shouldn't write a game off until they've at least tried it.

If people are unhappy with the low car/track count, and voice that displeasure, that has merit. It's their opinion. You're writing it off as invalid simply because it doesn't line up with your opinion.

You're correct that we haven't seen every last aspect of the campaign. But from everything we've seen so far, it looks like nothing but license tests, passing challenges, or a handful of auto-x style events. So when that's all people have been able to glean from the game's campaign so far, yep, they're going to come to the conclusion that's it. They may be wrong upon release — but they're going by what they've seen so far. It's really no different than you being hyped for the game without knowing what's in it, too: you're just on the other side of the fence.

You made the comparison to GT3 (otherwise known as the best GT game :P ). That came out less than a year into the PS2's lifecycle. GT Sport will be landing a month shy of four years into the PS4's.
 
I never said it's what people hear. What annoys me is when people give the game crap and what they say has no merit.

If you don't like the game for legitmate reasons, that's all good.

People shouldn't write a game off until they've at least tried it.

We did try the beta and how it "drives".So some people have legitmate reasons for not liking what GTS is gonna bring (or not) into the table.
 
I never said it's what people hear. What annoys me is when people give the game crap and what they say has no merit.

If you don't like the game for legitmate reasons, that's all good.

People shouldn't write a game off until they've at least tried it.
I'm pretty sure that the reasons people don't like any particular game are for reasons that are important to them, given the information they have. <<< Italics for the important distinction. Since there's no demo to try, trying it isn't possible anymore is it? It's all or nothing and people are going to make decisions based on what they read and see. For many, this game isn't impressive, to them. I think we know enough so far to draw the conclusion. It may change at launch or after and I'm sure people will re-evaluate if it does. Happens to all games, don't let it bother you.
 
If people are unhappy with the low car/track count, and voice that displeasure, that has merit. It's their opinion. You're writing it off as invalid simply because it doesn't line up with your opinion.

You're correct that we haven't seen every last aspect of the campaign. But from everything we've seen so far, it looks like nothing but license tests, passing challenges, or a handful of auto-x style events. So when that's all people have been able to glean from the game's campaign so far, yep, they're going to come to the conclusion that's it. They may be wrong upon release — but they're going by what they've seen so far. It's really no different than you being hyped for the game without knowing what's in it, too: you're just on the other side of the fence.

You made the comparison to GT3 (otherwise known as the best GT game :P ). That came out less than a year into the PS2's lifecycle. GT Sport will be landing a month shy of four years into the PS4's.
Fair point. People being unhappy with the cars and the tracks is fine. That's all good. I'm talking about people saying that the game looks bad visually (can you really say it looks bad graphically?) and stuff that isn't true. I don't know, I just feel like the game gets some unnecessary flack at points. Opinions are fine and I don't intend to change them nor should I. I just get a little frustrated at times.

It's true that GT Sport is coming out late into the cycle but it doesn't change the fact that it could be in GT3 in certain senses.

I'm pretty sure that the reasons people don't like any particular game are for reasons that are important to them, given the information they have. <<< Italics for the important distinction. Since there's no demo to try, trying it isn't possible anymore is it? It's all or nothing and people are going to make decisions based on what they read and see. For many, this game isn't impressive, to them. I think we know enough so far to draw the conclusion. It may change at launch or after and I'm sure people will re-evaluate if it does. Happens to all games, don't let it bother you.
Yeah, suppose you're right. I normally don't get this way but just today I saw a few things that got me up in arms a bit.
 
Not really a fair point in regards to campaign as anyone with eyes can see that all that has been shown is the first two challenges and the titles for the first line in the beginner stage. Anyone who thinks this is representative of the other twenty or so lines is being delusional.
 
We did try the beta and how it "drives".So some people have legitmate reasons for not liking what GTS is gonna bring (or not) into the table.
Yeah I said in my other post, it's all good if people don't like the game due to how it drives or certain features. Might be just overthinking it. Maybe too emotionally invested in the game. IDK man. No point arguing over it anyway, not a huge deal to begin with. Only a personal pet peeve I suppose.
 
Yeah I said in my other post, it's all good if people don't like the game due to how it drives or certain features. Might be just overthinking it. Maybe too emotionally invested in the game. IDK man. No point arguing over it anyway, not a huge deal to begin with. Only a personal pet peeve I suppose.

You feel the same way I do when I see people get over-hyped with no reason what so ever (imo) or when I see a video (like the latest PS Access "gameplay") with no actual gameplay and overhyping GTS like its the best "sim racing game" ever created.
(edit:again imo)
 
You feel the same way I do when I see people get over-hyped with no reason what so ever (imo) or when I see a video (like the latest PS Access "gameplay" with no actual gameplay and overhyping GTS like its the best "sim racing game" ever created).
I can see that. I'm hyped, but I know it won't be the best sim game ever. I just really enjoy the gameplay of GT plus I'm excited for Scapes and all the other bits they have in there. All I need to be really hyped.

I get it though, we all have our own opinions and feelings.
 
Fair point. People being unhappy with the cars and the tracks is fine. That's all good. I'm talking about people saying that the game looks bad visually (can you really say it looks bad graphically?) and stuff that isn't true.

Yeah, folks that say GT Sport looks outright bad are a little nuts. You won't hear an argument from me on that one. :lol:

That said, the gap has been closed considerably between PD's graphical prowess and other devs. A decade ago, GT5 Prologue utterly blew away the competition — the same year, FM2 arrived, for example. Polyphony's shader and lighting work is truly exceptional, but I don't see how anybody could straight-faced say any of the big three games launching this autumn (GTS, FM7, and PC2) look "bad". There really isn't much between them these days, at least compared to last-gen. Plus, when it's considered what some of them have to do in addition to just looking good (FM7 is locked at 60fps, both it and PC2 have dynamic time/weather), it's understandable that graphics take the sort of hit us fanatics can notice. I'm still blown away by the fact Project CARS 2 can have so many other cars on track in addition to dynamic time!
 
Yeah, folks that say GT Sport looks outright bad are a little nuts. You won't hear an argument from me on that one. :lol:

That said, the gap has been closed considerably between PD's graphical prowess and other devs. A decade ago, GT5 Prologue utterly blew away the competition — the same year, FM2 arrived, for example. Polyphony's shader and lighting work is truly exceptional, but I don't see how anybody could straight-faced say any of the big three games launching this autumn (GTS, FM7, and PC2) look "bad". There really isn't much between them these days, at least compared to last-gen. Plus, when it's considered what some of them have to do in addition to just looking good (FM7 is locked at 60fps, both it and PC2 have dynamic time/weather), it's understandable that graphics take the sort of hit us fanatics can notice. I'm still blown away by the fact Project CARS 2 can have so many other cars on track in addition to dynamic time!
Yeah, don't know what they're thinking, haha.

But also I agree, the gap has closed a lot. FM7 and Project CARS 2 look amazing, plus dynamic weather like you mentioned.

Like you said though, GT Sport has amazing lighting and (IMO) I think that's what makes it look the best of the current racers, although I can see how PCars 2 with rain and dynamic weather would look simply gorgeous.
 
not sure if this is a old or new video or if it's been posted already but I haven't seen it.

When I saw the Infiniti brand, I really thought PD modeled a G37 Gr.3/4.

And then I remembered they had a VGT, lol. Not complaining though, the Infiniti VGT is one of the actual "Grand-Tourer" concept cars, and boy it looks mean.
 


Quite a few interesting things in the video. :)

Look at that "pace" car livery. Looks like a POLIZEI car. ^^

41YMGvU.png

The scapes photo of Kaz Yamauchi is insane
KAZ.png
 
Thats your opinion mate.IMO it is not the case.And overall,Pcars 2 is a far more complete and better detailed experience than GTS and (again imo) that matters more than just "looks".

Not really. PC2 is graphically worse on consoles by a significant amount as well:
This is PC1

pcars642017-07-0616-1oisry.jpg

will2h1s6a.png

pcars642017-07-0616-55ls3v.jpg

170606103419733523s9sa8.png
 
Last edited:
Back