Following this logic would mean that popping the ball in your pocket and carrying it to the hole is not really cheating at golf. I mean, it’s possible..... and everybody can do it if they want.....Why on earth would you want bans for people who simply did what the game allowed them to do - It's not as if this tactic was secret, and was open for all to give it a try. Sure it's not in the spirit of the game, but really the blame for this lies not with the people who did it, but with PD who left this massive hole in the track.
It's not really cheating if the game allows everybody to do it. What I would define as cheating is if somebody modified or augmented the game to get the upper hand, much like those "aimbots" that plagued FPS games for some time. in such a case an online ban would be justified, but for this absolutely not.
The difference is that is against the rules in golf, so you can't do it without penalty if witnessed and reported. OTOH in GTS, the game is the sole enforcer, so if the game says it's fine, it's fine.Following this logic would mean that popping the ball in your pocket and carrying it to the hole is not really cheating at golf. I mean, it’s possible..... and everybody can do it if they want.....
And having been witnessed and reported, times have been disallowed and barriers put up, so again that would suggest it was cheating.The difference is that is against the rules in golf, so you can't do it without penalty if witnessed and reported. OTOH in GTS, the game is the sole enforcer, so if the game says it's fine, it's fine.
I love these comments, we all know that that does not go with the rules but there are still people making arguments without credibility.The difference is that is against the rules in golf, so you can't do it without penalty if witnessed and reported. OTOH in GTS, the game is the sole enforcer, so if the game says it's fine, it's fine.
Where is the rule that people were breaking? What does it say?I love these comments, we all know that that does not go with the rules but there are still people making arguments without credibility.
The game fails to execute them, it's not that they don't exist.
Everyone's times were disallowed, so by your logic, everyone was cheating. There was no action taken that differentiated between those who had used the fastest available route and those who didn't.And having been witnessed and reported, times have been disallowed and barriers put up, so again that would suggest it was cheating.
Not at all. In your golf example it would be cheating whether they were caught or not. I just disagree that driving the fastest permitted line around the track is cheating, unless someone can point me at a rule that was broken.Ok, so you are of the “it’s only a crime if you are caught” type of opinion.
A time trial is always over a set distance. The shortest possible route would be orienteering..... That’s usually cross-country as well.Not at all. In your golf example it would be cheating whether they were caught or not. I just disagree that driving the fastest permitted line around the track is cheating, unless someone can point me at a rule that was broken.
Not at all. In your golf example it would be cheating whether they were caught or not. I just disagree that driving the fastest permitted line around the track is cheating, unless someone can point me at a rule that was broken.
Just like the old Licence tests. Zero chance for any error.
Not at all. In your golf example it would be cheating whether they were caught or not. I just disagree that driving the fastest permitted line around the track is cheating, unless someone can point me at a rule that was broken.
Is there a rule anywhere that states that you must remain on the track? I know that in real world racing it is a violation to intentionally leave the track, but is it in GTS?you have answered your own question: the track is tarmac with kerbs at both sides, grass, dirt etc... are not the track unless it's rally track.
ps: a bug or exploit is not a permitted line is it? no so please stop trying to make it so, you know it's wrong (because you say it should be fixed) and so do the others who used it but again no ettiqutte or morals allows the use of an exploit/bug in a sim just to gain a time you know you can never achieve by driving the proper way, on a track.
Is there a rule anywhere that states that you must remain on the track? ...
You are playing online on a PSN service, using a PSN account and if you take a short cut during a time trial then you are cheating.Okay, I just did a search of the PSN terms and conditions for a few words, and found this:
"You may not cheat, exploit or use any bugs, glitches, vulnerabilities or unintentional game mechanics in PSN Services or any of its products or services to obtain an unfair advantage."
Is GTS a product or service of PSN? I know this may seem pedantic to ask, but it doesn't seem 100% clear to me that it is. The Sport Mode terms and conditions refer to the PSN terms and conditions, but don't make a similar mention of "unintentional game mechanics".
If it instead said "You may not cheat, exploit or use any bugs, glitches, vulnerabilities or unintentional game mechanics in PSN Services or any products or services that interact with it to obtain an unfair advantage.", then it would be clear to me that it covered an unintentional game mechanic in GTS. But the wording as it stands doesn't make it clear to me that GTS is subordinate to PSN, i.e. is a product or service of PSN, it seems more the other way round, that PSN is a service that GTS uses.
The reason it's important that the justification of calling people cheats is rock solid is they could pursue a libel case, and under UK law, the burden of proof would be on the people calling them cheats to prove their statement. So before I join in with the potentially libellous use of language, I'd like to be 100% sure that I can prove my case in court if required to do so.
I don't see those as constituting rules. The GTP article refers to another article, this one:Yes.
Are you really trying to tell us, you or the other guys do not know what driving a lap on a track means ? Holy !
The event's load screen gives a bit of info what to do there. It says Drive your Super lap and it tells you where to do it. It says Track : Streets of Willow Springs and it even displays a track map.
Have you ever taken a look at that ? If yes, you should have noticed that the track map doesn't show any lines that hint at a possible / allowed short cut.
There's your rules. They're simple, everyone should get that !
I can't sue you because you haven't libelled me, as I didn't take part in the time trial. My concern is the opposite one, that people could sue me if I called them a cheat without a proof that would stand up in court.Sue if you wish. Lol
... My concern is the opposite one, that people could sue me if I called them a cheat without a proof that would stand up in court.
It's hard to see why, after more than 20 years, Gran Turismo still doesn't have a typed down in-game set of rules
...
https://www.gran-turismo.com/au/gtsport/news/00_8406534.htmlI don't see those as constituting rules. The GTP article refers to another article, this one:
https://www.gtplanet.net/polyphony-digital-takes-action-misbehaving-gran-turismo-sport-players/
"It is strictly prohibited to act by improperly modifying game data, misbehaving using malfunctions in the game, or causing inconvenience to other users."
I just want to know where this rule is, such that it is unambiguous that it applies to GTS. I don't see this as being too much to ask.
If there is a clear rule prohibiting such things, then I will be delighted to start reporting any players I see violating that rule.
It certainly shows that they regard a rule as existing, but they haven't pointed us to the source material. I suspect it is the clause in the PSN terms and conditions that I pasted earlier. It's annoying that clause contains the ambiguity it does when it wouldn't be at all difficult to eliminate it.
I don't understand.It certainly shows that they regard a rule as existing, but they haven't pointed us to the source material. I suspect it is the clause in the PSN terms and conditions that I pasted earlier. It's annoying that clause contains the ambiguity it does when it wouldn't be at all difficult to eliminate it.
I don't remember any one specific reason being named.Can you remind me what that was for please? *Snip*
I'm pretty sure the bans were for people using the same reverse trick in online races to win by gaining a lap on the field.I don't understand.
I don't remember any one specific reason being named.
It was around the time when people were reversing backwards into pit-lane at Nurb. though, which meant people were earning lots of Credits very quickly.
So I wouldn't be surprised if that wasn't at least part of the reason.
Ooh. Didn't think of that one.I'm pretty sure the bans were for people using the same reverse trick in online races to win by gaining a lap on the field.