Sphinx
Staff Emeritus
- 6,724
- England
- GTP_Sphinx
Sphinx, that issue is actually a moot point, as the only perosn your really racing, is your self. We're not comparing lap times, but rather your evaluation of a set-up. The lap times are an assist in your comparison of the two set-ups. There need be no discussion of lap times, only differences in lap times.
Hi Der Alta, may I draw your attention to a snippet from Scaffs initial post:
and see which one results in the better lap time and the better car to drive.
Perhaps I misunderstood what Scaff was saying, but to me it read as; lets see which setup produces the better lap time and also which setup is the better car to drive.
I apologise if this is incorrect. However, regardless if I was incorrect or not, I cant see how it is a moot point because the differences between NTSC and PAL have been well documented, the Dodge Viper GTS-R Team Oreca '00 for example. In this case however, I admit that the differences with the Caterham Seven Fire Blade are only slight in terms of handling performance, but when attempting to drive to the max, it is noticeable.
In any case, I only mentioned it so you guys were aware of it beforehand. I wont make a meal out of it by raising it again unless asked. 👍
Amen to that. 👍 👍As for track, I do agree that Midfield is a simpler track, with less to take into account. This would assist us in our evaluation, as a complex track gives rise to considerably more variables that can be accounted for. In a scientific experiment, the less variables, the better as it makes for a cleaner hypothesis at the end.
In this regard, I'd like to use Midfield as it a very well known track, it is simple, and it would best fit our evaluation.
Can you add Ron (MrP) to the list? Ron would be a great asset to this, because he has what it takes when attempting to get the best out of a GT car and his input would be invaluable. 👍