Flat-outKent has been greenflagged, StrokerAce DQ'ed and I updated the leaderboard with the results of week 50.
That hasn't been discussed, but I've thought about it several times. Actually, someone who has indeed run the submitted time but can't prove it because he has no replay device should stay in the calculation. Someone who used the wrong tyres shouldn't.Laurence5905When someone is DQ'ed, shouldn't their time be removed from the "averages" that you calculate, and then Gold, Silver, and Bronze times be re-calculated? The two fastest folks in Div 2 got DQ'ed, and that *should* affect the Gold, Silver, and Bronze cut-off times, I would think...
Just my opinion, of course! Perhaps this discussion has been had before, and I'm just unaware of it.
👍Laurence5905When someone is DQ'ed, shouldn't their time be removed from the "averages" that you calculate, and then Gold, Silver, and Bronze times be re-calculated? The two fastest folks in Div 2 got DQ'ed, and that *should* affect the Gold, Silver, and Bronze cut-off times, I would think...
Just my opinion, of course! Perhaps this discussion has been had before, and I'm just unaware of it.
True, it can get very messy.Flat-outDone.
Dave_George and ferrari_chris have been promoted to gold.
But what if any of them hadn't a replay device ? Should his time be instaneously DQ'ed because he didn't post a replay or should he have another week to upload it. And if after one week he hasn't done so, should he be DQ'ed, removed from the calculation and the next one promoted to gold...
It can to a big mess, or to make replays compulsory...