- 2,270
- United States
- G_ASHER
Someone needs to put up a time other than me. Paging @ThrasherDBS and @Nismonath5
I'm on it!Someone needs to put up a time other than me. Paging @ThrasherDBS and @Nismonath5
Great time for the RE, so what is the time for the RGT?I saw the call out for more times needed and even though I wasn't mentioned, I decided to make my presence known in the Time Trial for this week.
Showed up in the RUF, threw on some SM tyres and went to work.
My Target? Barons RX-7 time of 1.26.1.
My Result? Nearly 2 seconds faster at 1.24.354, a rapid time if I say so myself.
I drove the RX-7 in the early days of GT6 and it was a very capable machine and still is even today.
The RGT is the tricky one to drive of the two with the engine at the back, but rewards those who can tame it.
The RX-7 is better as a good all rounder and can really tear up the twisty roads.
Head says RX-7, Heart says RGT, but given I can get more satisfaction driving a tricky car quick gives the edge to the RGT. 👍
The 1.24.3 IS from the RGT.It was the same in the previous club with M5, RS6, S
Great time for the RE, so what is the time for the RGT?
The Time Trial will be at Spa? I can tell someone's definately going to be participating this week...
Second this.I propose we all agree into not allowing skid recovery any more in our club trials since it makes the grip levels and the cars reactions clearly less realistic when pushed hard. I never use it no matter what since when I compared it to it being off and saw the difference in the early days of GT5.
I do exactly the same mate, but as there is a friendly competition here if, for example, half of us is driving with aids off and the other half with them on, it isn't so fair and square for the results. On the other hand, my main purpose for pariticpating is the fun of driving, posting my findings and reading the great posts of you guys, so whatever we decide I am in.I pretty much leave off any driving aid that isn't ABS set to 1, so I don't have an issue with that.
At Mid-Field on Comfort Softs, the X-Bow R is a solid 3 seconds quicker than its soft-core sibling. Let's go to the specs!
KTM X-Bow R '12
2.0L
298 hp / 6,000 rpm
295 ft-lb / 3,500 rpm
790 kg (1,742 lbs)
555 pp
KTM X-Bow Street '12
2.0L
236 hp / 5,500 rpm
229 ft-lb / 2,000 rpm
790 kg (1,742 lbs)
518 pp
Weight remains unchanged, horsepower difference of 59 and torque of 66. I suppose they call it a Street because its torque peaks a whopping 1,500 rpm sooner than in the track version, with 229 ft-lbs of twist at just 2,000 rpm, propelling only 1,742 lbs via the Audi engine in the middle, with all power delivered to the rear wheels. The R car has a nearly 300 hp 300 ft-lbs figure. Very nice.
151 mph - R
139 mph - Street
Here at Mid-Field, The Street is as fast as a Nissan GT-R '07 , but the R is one of the fastest cars in the game. I wish Mazda would do the opposite of what KTM did with the X-Bow and build a motorcycle based on MX-5 philosophy
@Nismonath5! DON'T THINK YOUR ROLLING COMPUTER GTR WILL SAVE YOU! IT LOST IN THE LAST DUEL AGAINST THE 458!