I could bet the majority of the "No" voters would buy it anyway.
I bet you $39.99 I wouldn't. I don't own GT5, not GT4.
I could bet the majority of the "No" voters would buy it anyway.
Wonderful, but don't you think some people who now might be strictly against it would get in sore temptation when the game would stand right in front of them in a retailers shelf? Perhaps at a discount? Perhaps with wonderful critics and very promising new features you possibly ever wanted to see in a GT title? No?I bet you $39.99 I wouldn't. I don't own GT5, not GT4.
I did see it quoted several times later in the year. I like that kind of thing....You should have been here in the early spring...amar212, our resident GT insider, posted a cryptic message with all kinds of hints about many aspects of GT5 we'd love, couched in allusions to weather and birds and all kinds of poetic fluff...
It should be cheaper than the 3...and do you really think the PS4 would be a disappointment after the preview of some of its capabilities we've seen? I know that I found it difficult to go back to the PS2 after getting the 3....I cant say I wouldnt buy a prologue if its released for PS3 but I can say for certain I wont be buying a PS4. I cant see myself spending that kind of money again with how disappointing PS3 was.
Now explain to me since when majority can't be meant with some?You said majority but given that we're talking about a poll with 85 total voters it's rather pointless anyway. I'm sure GT6P would sell well but clearly there are plenty of people who wouldn't. After all 9m people didn't buy GT5P.
Now explain to me since when majority can't be meant with some?
"Some" only defines that it's not nothing, not only one thing and not everything of something. The "majority" of something is the biggest part, in this case over 50% but less than 100%.
To be precise: Everything from 50%+(smallest possible)1 - 100%-(smallest possible)1
Currently: 32 No -> 17-31
Still want to say that some can't possibly be the majority of something? I also was only referring to this threads poll, just to be clear.
This is preposterous! Seeing the whole thing as a conversation which he was fully involved and aware of, there's no point of bringing up that bubble of contingently hypothetical inconsistency.Majority would be a subset of some then, so Simon wouldn't be wrong on calling you out. He did not say that "some" couldn't encapsulate the majority, he is saying that majority is a lot more specific and that is what he was attacking.
It's all vague and unspecific dear Exorcet, that's apparently what this whole thread is about. However, it should be clear that it was a personal deliberately assumption, which, although absolutely not arbitrary, is highly individual origin and not ideal to be seen as utterly predetermined matter.In either case I don't see why many people would necessarily change their mind unless PD did something drastically different like buyers of Prologue get GT6 full at a discount. I know I certainly won't buy another GT game for the PS3 ever.
Lock2LockNot paying $60 bucks for basically a demo of the game. No way I will do that again. I would pay maybe 1/4th of that or less. In my opinion it should be free. But i need to think realistic so free isn't going to happen. Having to pay $60 for a intro/demo of a game no just no.
Scuderia PaulGT Prologue has never been a full price title. It has always been €25 - €30 which is half what a full retail game is.
Lock2LockUmmm when i bought GT5 Prologue when it first came out it was $50-60 at game stop and at walmart
Scuderia PaulSerious?! You were robbed L2L.
I mean i might be mistaken on the exact price but i remember it being around 50 with tax and all. Which is still ridiculous for a intro/demo
ImaRobotLooking around I found that it was sold at $40. So after tax it would come somewhat under 45 most likely.
£24.99 was the original RRP here. Too much.
It should be cheaper than the 3...and do you really think the PS4 would be a disappointment after the preview of some of its capabilities we've seen? I know that I found it difficult to go back to the PS2 after getting the 3.
I have to say that I'm seriously ready to move on to GT6, no matter what system it's on. I love GT5, can hardly stop racing it, but all the patches are making my game senile. My brakes aren't working right now, have to adjust them or use ABS 1, weather is acting up, tracks fail to load, loading in general is sluggish as heck... I have to quit GT5 and reload after two or three races. And file bloat from Museum Cards and paint chips can't be helping. I'm going to get a late copy with the updates coded in, delete my install after a save backup and see if that fixes a few things.I know I certainly won't buy another GT game for the PS3 ever.
Here in Switzerland: GT5P 59 CHF -> 56$, 37, 29£ (including sales tax of about 8%)
I used exchange rates from april 2008.
Hopefully, GT6 is pretty much refined, defined and bullet proof. Patching games as you go is never as stable as a game coded right to start with.
But $40 instead of $60 US? That's stupid. Sony America are a law unto themselves, as usual.
First 100 votes. All anonymous.
Yes: 63
No: 37.
Positive posts: 13
Negative posts: 26
Rest are undecided, considering price and quality, or are more posts from the same users but discussing ideas instead of opinions/hate posts.
Leaderboard:
9 negative posts by simonk.
I know 100 votes and 86 posts is inconclusive, but still goes to show how much vocal a minority can be on the interwebz. Had I not added a poll the supposed consensus would have been completely opposite.
Well, to be fair I think PD will continue to be as committed to max simulation as the console will allow - but I'm guessing the "at this time" relates to that.I certainly agree that a PS3 GT6 could improve significantly over GT5. But for me, that's not enough. I want a leading edge simulation. Giving up PS4's hardware advantages won't allow for that. To me, GT6 on PS3 will be PD saying they're not interested in max simulation (at this time)...
Thanks for the breakdown - interesting indeed.First 100 votes. All anonymous.
Yes: 63
No: 37...
SNIP...
Ehh?How much was the full game?Here in Switzerland: GT5P 59 CHF -> 56$, 37€, 29£ (including sales tax of about 8%)
I used exchange rates from april 2008.
Exchange rates aren't that useful here, real prices are. You also can't really use PPP because a game is technically a luxury not a commodity, but it's probably still a better bet. In fact, you could probably use the prices of these games in different regions as a kind of PPP measure in themselves.
What? I'm sure that wasn't the actual reason. The problem was most likely how you did it.Be careful with stating your opinion. I got an infraction for stating my opinion.
Ehh?
59 CHF (Swiss Francs) was the real price, the price it was listed for AND the price in the stores AND the price I paid for it.
And were did I use PPP? I definitely did not! I only used the real exchange rates from april 2008 as I wrote in the post you quoted.
GT5 cost about 79 CHF, but at that time the dollar was already weaker than the Swiss Franc, making it even worse.
...