GT6 release date prediction (year)

  • Thread starter calahan
  • 112 comments
  • 8,932 views

when will GT6 released?

  • 2013

    Votes: 45 22.2%
  • 2014

    Votes: 92 45.3%
  • 2015

    Votes: 25 12.3%
  • >2015 lol

    Votes: 41 20.2%

  • Total voters
    203
I don't mind if GT6 comes out in 2014 or 2015. Since I surprisingly got a month ago a brand new backward-compatible 60gb PS3 (yep it was still in production in 2012) I can play without any problems GT3 and GT4 in HD for a long time.

It definitely isn't still in production, if it's genuinely new then it's stock that has been sat around a long time.

I think it would be awesome if PD would bring us a remastered edition of the very first Gran Turismo in HD graphics for the PS3, before they launch GT6 for PS4. If I am not mistaken, Gran Turismo is celebrating its 15th birthday on December 23rd?

Why? a HD GT1 would just be pretty much an even weaker GT5.
 
It definitely isn't still in production, if it's genuinely new then it's stock that has been sat around a long time.

You can say whatever you want, I know who I got my PS3 from...

Why? a HD GT1 would just be pretty much an even weaker GT5.

You can't compare GT1 with GT5, mate :)
Some tracks such as Deep Forest and High Speed Ring looked different than now. Also The SSR11 hasn't been featured after GT3, and PD even changed it. All I was thinking is making GT1 HD ready as a celebration package. Nearly all the cars of GT1 are already featured in GT5, so it wouldn't take long to develop the game. It would also keep us busy a little longer until GT6 comes out.
 
I'm not saying you didn't buy a brand new BC 60GB PS3 i'm just saying Sony certainly do not manufacture them anymore.

As for a HD GT1 what I meant was most of the charm of the PS1 games is how they look and perform, it's totally different to the current gen. If you updated the game so everything looked as good as GT5 then the experience would be pretty poor IMO.

Anyway I don't believe it will ever happen because of licenses, they would have re-acquire any that they no longer have.
 
As for a HD GT1 what I meant was most of the charm of the PS1 games is how they look and perform, it's totally different to the current gen. If you updated the game so everything looked as good as GT5 then the experience would be pretty poor IMO.

Good observation. I never thought of it like this.
 
^^ Well part of your post certainly scares me, and hopefully will not be further "exploited" with technology. War is something that shouldn't just be made fun, we should celebrate that human responsibility has effectively brought world peace... not that there shouldn't be war games, but with some of the titles I feel there is a massive amount of lowness to them.

Forgive me for instilling worry and fear in you, but what you really should be worried about are the actual technologies that have always been, and continue to be used, in reality, to make the indiscriminate and disgraceful killing machines of several renown powers increasingly potent and efficient for the sake of realizing their dishonorable agendas at the cost of human life, peace, freedom, and prosperity.

Are you living in 2012? I wish I could agree with you in 'celebrating human responsibility in effectively bringing world peace'. In fact, our choices and actions as humans have driven us the furthest away from world peace in the 50,000 year history of the modern Homo-sapien. This indicates a 'severely profound lack of responsibility' and actually a retardation of capacity, as with such time, and the intelligence and tools (technologies) we have acquired, we have chosen to drive ourselves beyond the points of human and planetary disaster.

Sex and fantasy relationship games are just ridicules, the beauty of life is not to be made virtual... silly.

I agree that erotic and fantasy relationship video games are silly, but that is not what I was referring to mate. I am talking about a completely immersive experience wherein at some point in the future you will be able to enter a sub-concious realm of virtual reality and experience things as if they were completely real.

Life is indeed profoundly beautiful. Such beauty, and the infinite experiences to be had, should most definitely be had in real life, in reality. However, there is MUCH benefit to having a realm of Virtual Reality (and video games) wherein you can allow an individual to encounter experiences that are either healthy for the mind, body, and soul, or those that are simply desired yet may have some potential psychological, physical, or monetary consequences ranging from mild to severe. An outlet of a sort that would allow you to live life responsibly.

'The beauty of life is not to be made virtual' is quite a vague statement. Most of us are more than intrigued by the technologies in place that are utilized for recreating and replicating the beauty of life for enjoyment in more that one way, or more than just in the ways you can only enjoy in reality.
 
Forgive me for instilling worry and fear in you, but what you really should be worried about are the actual technologies that have always been, and continue to be used, in reality, to make the indiscriminate and disgraceful killing machines of several renown powers increasingly potent and efficient for the sake of realizing their dishonorable agendas at the cost of human life, peace, freedom, and prosperity.

Are you living in 2012? I wish I could agree with you in 'celebrating human responsibility in effectively bringing world peace'. In fact, our choices and actions as humans have driven us the furthest away from world peace in the 50,000 year history of the modern Homo-sapien. This indicates a 'severely profound lack of responsibility' and actually a retardation of capacity, as with such time, and the intelligence and tools (technologies) we have acquired, we have chosen to drive ourselves beyond the points of human and planetary disaster.

Without veering too much of course here, yes, there are some nations who are interested in developing weapons of mass destruction, with a sole purpose of expanding their prosperity. It's a shame you like to tie that in with the greater picture of amazing technological progression, because an interest in invading new land to conquer is a natural human "drive" whether it's with bow and arrow or with today's advanced killing machines.

I have tremendous respect for what has happened on this earth through human history, unfortunately for you, I'd have to say we are living in a pretty stable world, with just about every nation respectful of it's boarders. Now if you want to talk about the absolute destruction we are causing to our earth through manufacturing, transportation, construction, chemical-use, never ending greed for natural resources, waste/sewage management, bad agricultural practices, ect., ect., you're right this does indicate a 'severely profound lack of responsibility'.

I'm of firm belief, given that there is seemingly zero interest from most of the worlds big manufacturing (and consuming) nations to severely restrict and change current ways of doing things, that in roughly 50 years, the earths atmosphere will be so toxic, the entire population of the world will have to go back and live in completely natural ways, just like our ancestors did.

If people who passed away 100+ years ago, woke them up and showed them what is going on this earth, they wouldn't believe their eyes. To think about that everything that we have today really comes from the 'plain' earth we live on is so far beyond belief... it is such a double edged sword, one side shows the brilliance of what humans have progressed to, the other of course is that it come at the expense of perhaps all life on earth... it's really terrible.

If only all governments would be scrambling to achieve clean energy, every homeowner is forced to produce their own electricity and use clean transportation the world would be a much better place. The most beautiful thing is to wake up in the morning, hear the birds and just spend the day outside without any 'tech', thank goodness most people on earth still live in this fashion, because 'tech' really hasn't made quality of life better.

Anyway I'm looking forward to GT6, hopefully solar panels and private wind-turbines can be relatively cheaply installed... yep, zero emission racing... hope this post has it's place in this thread now... :lol:



I agree that erotic and fantasy relationship video games are silly, but that is not what I was referring to mate. I am talking about a completely immersive experience wherein at some point in the future you will be able to enter a sub-concious realm of virtual reality and experience things as if they were completely real.

Life is indeed profoundly beautiful. Such beauty, and the infinite experiences to be had, should most definitely be had in real life, in reality. However, there is MUCH benefit to having a realm of Virtual Reality (and video games) wherein you can allow an individual to encounter experiences that are either healthy for the mind, body, and soul, or those that are simply desired yet may have some potential psychological, physical, or monetary consequences ranging from mild to severe. An outlet of a sort that would allow you to live life responsibly.

'The beauty of life is not to be made virtual' is quite a vague statement. Most of us are more than intrigued by the technologies in place that are utilized for recreating and replicating the beauty of life for enjoyment in more that one way, or more than just in the ways you can only enjoy in reality.

Meh, I don't get it, and I don't want to.
 
There are some problems with that theory, one big one regarding a PS3 GT6 coming out next year. It hasn't been announced. How many AAA games do you know that get announced and released within a year?

Hey now, I remember this exact argument I made months and months ago. ;)
 
Hey now, I remember this exact argument I made months and months ago. ;)

But months and months ago it could have been announced and released next year. It obviously hasn't and now it is too late, it wasn't a few months ago. Metal Gear Solid Ground Zeroes was only revealed at the end of August for a current gen release next year. There was still time a few months ago.
 
But months and months ago it could have been announced and released next year. It obviously hasn't and now it is too late, it wasn't a few months ago. Metal Gear Solid Ground Zeroes was only revealed at the end of August for a current gen release next year. There was still time a few months ago.

Not in conjuntion with the same argument I did then, that it made little to no sense to release a new GT that late in a consoles lifecycle. Not with a (then)new announced iteration of hardware to be released only a few months after GT6(PS3) release (if GT6 were to be release in third quarter/late 2013).

And not to forget that PD might be working on a vita version, with it's (Vitas)current lackluster performance might have been given extra prioriarity over GT6 to get it out as soon as possible to boost hardware sales. If it's being made that is, which is pure speculation on my part.
 
If it's an awesome and finished game it's no problem. GT5 wasn't...

GT4 is still the best GT Game ever, i hope GT6 can beat it.

It's still a problem in my opinion but, it's very small if, GT6 lives up to the hype.
 
Today, my friend told me that GT6 would probably be released in about a year. He's not an expert, but I think he might be right.
 
SimonK
Indeed but we would just have to hope that the extended lead-in time with the new console (They started as soon as GT5 was done, remember) that we will have a complete experience in 2014.

I doubt that developer kits have remained the same for 2 years.
Also, the first GT experience for the PS4 will be a Prologue for sure, so, not a complete one.

If the PS4 is right around the corner, it means PD has screwed things badly by not releasing a second proper complete GT experience for the PS3, something that wouldn't be too hard (more tracks, cars, categories and a bunch of extras long discussed in other threads).
 
I doubt that developer kits have remained the same for 2 years.

No but the largest part of the work (building the cars) was a cross-platform activity, maybe that's how they started. Building the cars with the knowledge they could either be used for another PS3 game or a PS4 game but not really knowing at the time.

Also PD are of course a first party dev so would have been the first to get all of the new dev kit developments. Again most of the work in a GT game is modelling, Kaz said that himself and since he also said the premium cars are high enough quality for next-gen then I think it's fair to say that they'll have enough time with the near-final dev kits to build the 'game' part in time for 2014 as well as further modelling time.

Of course I could be entirely wrong and they've spent a large chunk of their time making a Vita game and they're still miles behind on GT6. The fact they can't get away with PS2 models on PS4 and so really need to get cracking to compete with Forza 5 kinda makes me hopeful though.


Also, the first GT experience for the PS4 will be a Prologue for sure, so, not a complete one.

After missing out on a second full PS3 experience I truly, truly hope not. People aren't going to stand for that crap again, or at least I hope not.
 
SimonK
No but the largest part of the work (building the cars) was a cross-platform activity, maybe that's how they started. Building the cars with the knowledge they could either be used for another PS3 game or a PS4 game but not really knowing at the time.

Also PD are of course a first party dev so would have been the first to get all of the new dev kit developments. Again most of the work in a GT game is modelling, Kaz said that himself and since he also said the premium cars are high enough quality for next-gen then I think it's fair to say that they'll have enough time with the near-final dev kits to build the 'game' part in time for 2014 as well as further modelling time.

Of course I could be entirely wrong and they've spent a large chunk of their time making a Vita game and they're still miles behind on GT6. The fact they can't get away with PS2 models on PS4 and so really need to get cracking to compete with Forza 5 kinda makes me hopeful though.

After missing out on a second full PS3 experience I truly, truly hope not. People aren't going to stand for that crap again, or at least I hope not.

As a first party dev, wouldn't it be reasonable to expect them to deliver a GT Vita game? This alone could push GT6 back one whole year, considering they use most of GT5's code for the Vita game.

Even if they skip the Prologue version, 2015 seems like a good bet. Unless they are spending A lot of time doing a 4K GT version...

Ok, this is getting scarier each time.
 
Back