GT7 Update Coming August 25

  • Thread starter Kevster823
  • 1,162 comments
  • 131,825 views
You assume Sony isn't behind the whole thing. I blame them for pushing PD to release it before it was ready. They needed another AAA title for the PS5 and they wanted it NOW. And here we are.
What difference does it make whether the questionable decisions were made by the publisher or developer? All that should matter to the customer is the end product’s ability to deliver what was advertized.
 
Yes, it is. Well done. People want the latest models, even if they are "inferior". The 2022 F1 cars are slower than the 2021 cars but guess what? People still want to drive them in the official game, because they're new.

Plus you're conveniently ignoring all the car models that are brand new, not just new year models of existing cars. Ferrari 296? One of the newest Ferraris, people always want to drive the latest new Ferrari model.

Also going by your logic, why are they adding the 1988 McLaren F1 car? It's far inferior to later McLaren F1 cars, the 2022 cars would run rings round it. The answer is because it's still a desirable car for people to drive despite that. The same applies to all cars, people don't only want to drive them because they're the best in their class, or the best ever version of that model. You can't just use the performance being "inferior" when it suits your argument.
I literally said a few posts down cars with pedigrees deserve the spot over new cars with zero pedigree. Troll.
 
I literally finished first on race, game loaded up to give my money, went offline for server maintenance and I recorded that session haha i was breaking records trying to make it
 
I really don't think PD could come up with worse updates if they tried. Trying to sneak in a Mangusta "by Dior" as a new vehicle is hilarious. The GTO and the Cayman have been in so many previous games. The only car of any substance is the MP4/4 IMO. Even that doesn't have a proper rival to race against.
As for Catalunya with 3 layouts, again, why weren't they available from the get go? To then claim it's free, seemingly 'new' DLC is totally disingenuous.
Isn't the F1500T-A supposed to be competition for the MP4/4? Even though the performance was slightly different between the '85 and '88 F1 seasons, I'd imagine PD will have them somewhat balanced.
 
Not really a secret, but hey, you do you.

I did buy it digitally. Day one. I bought something that was not what was advertised. Hell, it still isn't what is currently advertised. Selling cars anyone? The more people that don't stand up to this scum behaviour, the worse it is for the gaming industry as a whole. I for one, won't bend over and take it up the tailpipe from these developers after they have shown time and time again that they do not respect their loyal fanbases, yourself included.

How do you defend this behaviour? honestly?
All things considered, I personally think this is the best Gran Turismo to date. I go back and play GTS a few times a month to compare/contrast a few things. I’m always left with the same feeling; GTS isn’t the game GT7 is. Better physics, better graphics, better sounds, dynamic track conditions, dynamic TOD and weather. Content lacking aside (which is completely subjective btw), personally I think this game has provided repaid me it’s cost 2x’s over with smiles. I’ll gladly be waiting to fork over a C-note for GT8… whatever that ends up looking like. I could never go back to playing the older games after this one. And I’m sure I feel the same way when GT8 comes out. PD gave us great bones with this game. The rest will come in due time.

JMHO 👍🏼
 
How many times i heard this about sports games and they always ends up buying that latest game anyway 😊
Well, certainly not me.

I don't know what's your guys problem with people quitting anyway. It's not like the company will go bankrupt lol
 
Last edited:
If it wasn't for us pointing out and shining a constant light on the glaring issues with this game, then the stupid rally would still be the best money maker right after it was nerfed. How can you defend a scummy company that so obviously tried to nickel and dime you?

I am glad to see this game copping all the flak because it damn well deserves it.


Trolling? I am expressing rightful disappointment on a forum after being lied to about what this game was, shelling out $125 because I was led to believe that THIS WAS THE GT! The return to form! Look at what was delivered. GT Sport 1.5. If you can't see that, then I don't know what to say.

Like the person above you, I have no idea how you can blindly defend a scum company that obviously tried to nickel and dime you. They tried, copped alot of warranted backlash and now they are very slowly back pedaling.

This game is of interest to me because my money was basically stolen from me. I will wait until it is what I was sold and continue to check in here and comment where I see fit.

Never forget what these scumbags tried. I know I won't.
Where did you read me defending this company?
I was just pointing out the mindless unending screaming some people post on this forum.
Get over it. You don't like the game. You think you were misled. You lost 70 pop on a game. Move on pal, your emotional pain is waisted on an everyday occurrence that a mature person would not anguish over for six months. If this is your reaction to not liking a game you bought, I wonder how that relates to the serious stuff in the world, you know the stuff you read in papers every day.
 
Well yes, that's what I said "people", which most people understand that in general speech/text to mean an indeterminate number of people, but not every person. If I meant everybody, I'd have said everybody.
“People want” implies consensus. I’m sure you’d disapprove if someone kept saying “people want old cars”.
 
1661407970561.png
 
I literally said a few posts down cars with pedigrees deserve the spot over new cars with zero pedigree. Troll.
You also said newer cars shouldn't be added because they're inferior to the older models.

But magically the same doesn't apply to older cars for you.

Look, I get it. You personally prefer older cars. But that doesn't mean there aren't plenty of people out there who want the new cars. You're just not one of them.
“People want” implies consensus. I’m sure you’d disapprove if someone kept saying “people want old cars”.
No, because both are true. People want new cars. People want old cars. I thought that was pretty obvious, one statement doesn't discount the others, but perhaps not. English can be a funny language.
 
Last edited:
If you feel so offended , go ahead sue them
You and I both know that would get nowhere, that's why these companies just keep pushing to see how far they can go before they no longer get away with it. Sadly with the blind defenders of practices like these, it would seem they can go much, much further.

I'm afraid this is the trend now, man.

This will also be my last GT, despite finding enjoyment with it.
Yeah same here unfortunately man. The real shame is the sheer amount of potential there is in this game. It could so easily be one of the greatest games made.

Where did you read me defending this company?
I was just pointing out the mindless unending screaming some people post on this forum.
Get over it. You don't like the game. You think you were misled. You lost 70 pop on a game. Move on pal, your emotional pain is waisted on an everyday occurrence that a mature person would not anguish over for six months. If this is your reaction to not liking a game you bought, I wonder how that relates to the serious stuff in the world, you know the stuff you read in papers every day.
Well complaining about complaining usually constitutes the defense of a belief contrary to that which you are complaining about.

I think that this game deserves all the complaints its getting and then some more. It wasn't 70 pop either, it was 125. Now I don't know about you, but to some that is a damn hefty chunk of hard earned and when I part with my cash I expect to receive what I was sold.

And there's another point, anguishing for six months. That's right. They have had six months to bring this game up to scratch and have it represent the promises made by PD and the reviewers. They still have not done this. not by a long shot.

Also. *Wasted
 
Not really a secret, but hey, you do you.

I did buy it digitally. Day one. I bought something that was not what was advertised. Hell, it still isn't what is currently advertised. Selling cars anyone? The more people that don't stand up to this scum behaviour, the worse it is for the gaming industry as a whole. I for one, won't bend over and take it up the tailpipe from these developers after they have shown time and time again that they do not respect their loyal fanbases, yourself included.

How do you defend this behaviour? honestly?
I hear you bro. I for one will purchase GT8 second hand even if I had to wait months and will not give PD my money for what they tried to do with GT7.
 
Yeah same here unfortunately man. The real shame is the sheer amount of potential there is in this game. It could so easily be one of the greatest games made.
Agreed, the only thing that still interests me right now is just hotlapping, other than that I'm just not sold on. The multiplayer lobbies are still unstable too (well, according to my experience. Don't know if these white knights here have different experiences).
 
Agreed, the only thing that still interests me right now is just hotlapping, other than that I'm just not sold on. The multiplayer lobbies are still unstable too (well, according to my experience. Don't know if these white knights here have different experiences).
The wasted potential is the reason for my disappointment. All the stuff is right there for this to be the true return to form, but they just don't do it. They insist on this dangling of the carrot to keep the donkey moving.

I enjoy hot lapping too. its really good fun. That's one of the things the GT does really well. Although its not classed as a full blown sim, its damn close and it feels awesome on the wheel.
 
While understandable why PD didn't have the Marlboro logos on the car, its strange they didn't at least model it the MP4/4's livery after this:

View attachment 1186652

Its pretty much still in period as was the case with the Lotus 97T when it too ran in races where Tobacco advertising was banned.
I think this has something to do with how PD has always valued the aesthetic side of things, just like having generic slits on tyres when you put racing slicks on historic cars. Yes, having those barcode-looking substitutes is gonna make it look more period-correct, but having them on the car will displease some people because it simply doesn’t look nice to them. Removing them will also make other groups annoyed, but given they don’t know how many people find these things important, they probably just went with what they thought looks the best. Either that or it simply wasn’t on the car when they modelled it for the game. :lol:

Anyway, it’s one of those small decisions that I welcome. :)
 
Back