GTP Cool Wall: 1981-1989 Dodge Aries

  • Thread starter Wiegert
  • 527 comments
  • 39,625 views

1981-1989 Dodge Aries


  • Total voters
    206
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think "we never even tried" is more fitting, giving up would imply they put effort into the car at some point in time.:lol:

Hey remember these cars saved Chrysler, they had to try a little by making the Ks dirt cheap.
 
I'll bite.

I'd give a Model T an uncool. Not for the reasons you listed, although the 'single color' applies based on what I believe.

My main issue with the Model T was what it became for Ford - something that nearly drove the company into bankruptcy because of Henry Ford believing that there was nothing better available in terms of cars, and therefore didn't bother to try to bring new ideas in.

Sure, they did sell a ridiculous number of the things, mainly because of two factors; nothing else better available, and price. Those two in combination can be fantastic, but when you keep producing the same thing over and over without any changes for a long time, eventually a few things will happen;

-Complacency, here being that the large number of sales of the Model T meant there wasn't a push for innovation;
-Market saturation, with how many Model Ts there were sold eventually there is a point where the market will drop out because of the number available.

(I'll continue the rest of this post later, have a dinner event to attend and I'm on mobile so I can't easily pull my resources and citations together until I get home.)
 
Wait, so reliability, high build quality, and sort-of handsome looks aren't ok?
That is one of the ugliest cars I have ever seen. It makes ugly cars like Cavaliers eye candy. You gotta appreciate you're overattached to this car.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VXR
Remember, this car saved Chrysler from bankruptcy.

So did the Porsche Cayenne, in a sense. It inflated the sales of Porsche massively. The Jetta MK3 also allowed VW not to pull the plug in America. Heck, even the 2012 Honda Civic is very boring. Maybe it didn't quite save the scompany, but it sold in great numbers. But are they cool? No way. Besides, just look at it!

Now you should understand that the Aries isn't a Seriously Uncool car, and it really was important in Chrysler's history.

Refer back to my other statement.

No offense, but you're just asking to start a flame war. If you praise this car but know that know one else does, then it's probably a not a good idea to try and change other's minds about it. Same goes for anything else.
 
It wasn't super boxy like a Cavalier, which I mentioned before.

So... Ultra, "Beware! Legitimately Sharp Edges" boxy?

aries-in-snow.jpg


And regular-old "super" boxy:

Chevrolet-Cavalier-1982-CX5160-SV-0004.jpg


Yeah. I can believe that.
 
Last edited:
I'm just guessing that you weren't alive between 1981 and 1989. I was. This wasn't "pretty stylish" back then - it was ass.


If I were in film and casting someone to drive this car it would be "extremely elderly man who has a heart attack while driving very slowly indeed". If you pulled up outside my house in this I'd think you were here to take my grandma to bingo - and she's been dead for fourteen years.
The Aries was much closer to "badass" than "ass".

If I was in a film and casting someone to drive this car, it would be a car nerd who is very informed about Mopar and knows that not all 80's cars were uncool. But that's just me.

Bo
Bingo!

Even if it was the things you believe it is, it still wouldn't be cool. Just look at the thing.

Like =/= cool. Or in your case, obsessed with =/= cool.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

An utterly tragic car. Genuinely depressing. Firmly in the pits of hell, far, far below SU.

Tragic?

It was the opposite of a failure. Combined, Aries/Reliant achieved two million in sales in nine years. And it was only sold here in 'Murica. I don't think it's depressing, and it belongs in heaven, not hell. Good cars go to heaven, and failed cars go to hell.
 
The Aries was much closer to "badass" than "ass".

If I was in a film and casting someone to drive this car, it would be a car nerd who is very informed about Mopar and knows that not all 80's cars were uncool. But that's just me.
it would be a car nerd who is very informed about Mopar
and knows that not all 80's cars were uncool.
Wouldn't a guy who was being casted to film and was very informed about Mopar drive something more high performance in the 80s, something like a Daytona, over this?
 
So... Ultra, "Beware! Legitimately Sharp Edges" boxy?

aries-in-snow.jpg

Chevrolet-Cavalier-1982-CX5160-SV-0004.jpg


Yeah. I can believe that.
They are both boxy cars by today's standards. The one on the top is slightly less boxy, and looks better though.
 
Wouldn't a guy who was being casted to film and was very informed about Mopar drive something more high performance in the 80s, something like a Daytona, over this?
If I was the director, I'd give the person casted an Aries, also because they cost less than a Daytona, easier to access since they are less rare.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back