GTP Cool Wall: 1981-1989 Dodge Aries

  • Thread starter Wiegert
  • 527 comments
  • 40,568 views

1981-1989 Dodge Aries


  • Total voters
    206
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
No car made before 2000 is as cool as the Miura. I'd swap my Dodge for a Miura any day.

Oh, dear. At this point, I will quote Vsauce Michael: "Parody of extremism and sincere extremism are difficult to distinguish. Although clever... [your rebuttals are] ad hoc explanations, excuses made on the spot that only address one issue and don't fit all the evidence... Why the egotistical obsession with our observations?"
 
Please tell me more about the 82hp badass.

It's late at night here and I could do with reading something spectacularly boring to get me away.


Was their target demographic the recently deceased?
114hp is Mustang horsepower, and we all know how Mustangs are badass. Most Aries's had the middle-of-the-range 96hp 2.5L engine, anyway.
 
The Aries was much closer to "badass" than "ass".

are-you-serious-right-now.jpg


I get liking a car, but there is a reason biker gangs don't roll around on Vespas even if they are a good quality product.
 
But surely, if you're directing a film you'd have the funds to access a Daytona, right?
I'm a frugal guy, so I'd go for the cheaper option.

View attachment 528677
You may want to rethink that :P

I'll give the Bullitt a second or third place, very cool vehicle indeed.

A brief history of the Dodge K-Car in the movies:

i553221.jpg

i448663.jpg

i570599.jpg

i480725.jpg

i191665.jpg

Your pics are broken.

are-you-serious-right-now.jpg


I get liking a car, but there is a reason biker gangs don't roll around on Vespas even if they are a good quality product.

I'm serious about the way I feel on the Aries. Biker gangs don't roll around on Vespas because they are scooters, not bikes.
 
114hp is Mustang horsepower
It went as low as 88hp.
and we all know how Mustangs are badass.
I think you're overstating the "we" there - but only slightly more than you're overstating the badassness of the third gen Mustang with the Pinto...
Most Aries's had the middle-of-the-range 96hp 2.5L engine, anyway.
Whoah, steady on there. Not sure I can take in all the awesome at once.

And it still looks like ass.
 
114hp is Mustang horsepower, and we all know how Mustangs are badass. Most Aries's had the middle-of-the-range 96hp 2.5L engine, anyway.
You could get 150hp Grand Ams in 86, mot to mention all the better or more fun cars Dodge made. Skylark turbos Daytona turbos, Omni turbos. This is the most boring Dodge I know of. Ever.
 
If I was in a film and casting someone to drive this car, it would be a car nerd who is very informed about Mopar and knows that not all 80's cars were uncool. But that's just me.

Even in the 1980s the only people who had these as cars in movies were poor people, fleet operators and background vehicles. College kids or jocks or whatever? They might have Daytonas.
 

For third-gem Stangs, 114 was Mustang horsepower.


Wonder what's inside the box. Parts for a broken, unreliable Cavalier maybe?

It went as low as 88hp.I think you're overstating the "we" there - but only slightly more than you're overstating the badassness of the third gen Mustang with the Pinto...
Whoah, steady on there. Not sure I can take in all the awesome at once.

And it still looks like ass.

It looks like a badass ass (mule).

You could get 150hp Grand Ams in 86, mot to mention all the better or more fun cars Dodge made. Skylark turbos Daytona turbos, Omni turbos. This is the most boring Dodge I know of. Ever.

Bear in mind Grand Ams were a different size class than Aries. Aries was compact, Grand Am was midsize. Sure, Dodge made funner cars in the 80's, but this was not the most boring car the company ever pumped out.
 
For third-gem Stangs, 114 was Mustang horsepower.
5.0 is a different story. Of course, it started out as 140 HP, but it sure got stronger.

Wonder what's inside the box. Parts for a broken, unreliable Cavalier maybe?
I think he's trying to say that it's boxy.
 
This is ironic

Not seeing the irony. I need an explanation.

Even in the 1980s the only people who had these as cars in movies were poor people, fleet operators and background vehicles. College kids or jocks or whatever? They might have Daytonas.

Poor people? I don't think so, because people who buy the new Dodge Dart, starting at $16k, aren't poor. Poor people are turning to late 90's and early 00's Neons, maybe Stratuses.

I almost dare not ask, but compared to what? Glaucoma?

Compared to Chevy Cavalier, Ford Escort, and every other 80's compact. How can you compare a car to an eye disease in the first place?
 
For third-gem Stangs, 114 was Mustang horsepower.



Wonder what's inside the box. Parts for a broken, unreliable Cavalier maybe?



It looks like a badass ass (mule).



Bear in mind Grand Ams were a different size class than Aries. Aries was compact, Grand Am was midsize. Sure, Dodge made funner cars in the 80's, but this was not the most boring car the company ever pumped out.
It's exactly as bad as the Cavalier, can't you see?
To everyone else, it looks just like that, only 5% are seeing it differently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back