The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,186
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
As if I was referring to anything other than the Aries with that description.
Those A-pillars says otherwise. Hell, even the wheel arches look like they're struggling to maintain any amount of curvature.
I know an Aries isn't as curvy as Kim Kardashian's buttocks, but all 80's sedans were boxy. The Aries was stylishly boxy. Foxy boxy.
Badass?
It seems you have literally been blinded by Mopar bias.
I don't think so.
W&N's Sunbird - even in it's last known state of ruined suspension and tappety knocks from the front end - has more road presence, grace and appeal than this thing. And that's really saying something.
Please don't mention White Nerdy.
The Grand Am was a marginally smaller car than the Aries.
You are thinking of the Sunbird or 1000.
You can describe the Aries' looks as "badass" but for accuracy you need a space between the 'd' and the 'a'.
I don't think so.
It's exactly as bad as the Cavalier, can't you see?
To everyone else, it looks just like that, only 5% are seeing it differently.
No, the Cavalier is worse than the Aries. I think more than 5% think the car is cool, I just think some are embarrassed to show support for an 80's "junky" sedan.