GTP Cool Wall: 2002-2006 Pyeonghwa Hwiparam
- Thread starter GranTurismo916
- 109 comments
- 8,339 views
- 3,957
- Cleveland
Please don't encourage further nominations like this by going on at length with how terrible they are... I may vote SZ just to keep this thing out of hell so people stop trying. I don't want to look at or know about something like this.
- 6,658
- Marietta, GA
- Dagger31198
This is exactly why the cool wall result system is very, very flawed. The vast majority voted SU, but because one guy wanted to spite everyone, it will now be virtually impossible for it to get to hell.
- 3,957
- Cleveland
I did in fact suggest an improvement in the Results Thread, but added complication...
- 86,597
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Or, more likely, so that they'll keep trying because they weren't successful this time round thanks to your protest vote...
- 4,487
- YorkshireLand
- SVTlover
Errm....yeah. This isn't going to end well.
- 2,964
- Buckinghamshire
- GTP_Snorevette
Isn't that the name of that one bloke who played Sherlock?
- 1,657
- With Kim Jong Un
A rebadged version of an already bad car, that alone makes it Seriously Uncool. Not only that, a terrible name, and it was made in North Korea, a country which by all accounts should not build any cars. Hell is too kind for this car. Shoot the monkeys who work at Pyeonghwa, destroy all known Hwiparams, and delete any evidence of this car.
Last edited:
- 14,656
- The UK
- JASON_ROCKS1998
- JR98 GAMING
Not just all Hwiparams, all cars ever built by Pyeonghwa too!
- 5,551
- Controls set for heart of sun
- GTP_RogerTheHors
That may be, but I personally think the OP should maintain neutrality.
- 4,763
- Houston, TX
Oh look a Quest sedan from best Korea. SU.
- 6,658
- Marietta, GA
- Dagger31198
My mom has owned a 2001 Quest for as long as I can remember, and it took me this long to realize they do look similar.Oh look a Quest sedan from best Korea. SU.
Roo
Premium
- 7,416
- Hampshire, UK
- GTP_Roo
Boo-freakin'-hoo. You say that like where this car ends up on the Cool Wall is important or something.
In any case, even if you discounted the Cool and SZ votes, as it currently stands it would only take one more Meh or Uncool vote to keep it above -1.800. I voted it Uncool; it's not interesting enough to be SU, and the only thing keeping it from a Meh vote from me is the name. I've contributed to keeping the car out of Hell. What of it?
As an aside, if you don't like the idea of people being contrary for the sake of being contrary, the Internet is possibly not the place for you.
Edit: Got my numbers wrong. A car needs to be lower than -1.89 to go to Hell. The Uncool votes alone keep it out, even if the 7 people who voted Meh, Cool or SZ had voted SU.
Same applies to @CSMDuty11.
Last edited:
@CSMDuty11 -- This thread is simply the pursuit of a specific outcome, driven by mutual back-patting over a metaphorical low-hanging fruit, because North Korea. It's an unreasonable poll, so it gets an unreasonable vote. Is it even about the coolness of a car? I don't think so.
- 19,618
- Alabamamania
Eighty-four horsepower sounds kind of puny, but where are you going? And what's your rush to get there? What other traffic are you competing against, and where do you really think there's infrastructure for a weekend drive?
These sound a bit like Zen metaphors, so three pounds of flax.
They filled the doors with solid leader.
In any case, if you actually lived in North Korea, you'd probably get so excited for your chance to buy it (or, you traded away your family to the lowest rung of society to prove your worth) you'd vote Cool, because only The Leader is Sub-Zero and able to stop sub-atomic particles from motion.
These sound a bit like Zen metaphors, so three pounds of flax.
They filled the doors with solid leader.
In any case, if you actually lived in North Korea, you'd probably get so excited for your chance to buy it (or, you traded away your family to the lowest rung of society to prove your worth) you'd vote Cool, because only The Leader is Sub-Zero and able to stop sub-atomic particles from motion.
Last edited:
