famine
Notwithstanding all of that, what makes you sure that your hitherto unspoken interpretation is the correct one?
David Lynch has explained the basic plot line of the film... I'll see if I can find the link... This is what get's me... I explained numerous times that I would love to have a
civil conversation about the film (via PM)... I never proclaimed my intellectual superiority... It's about as rediculous as posting your IQ...
Rather than trying to convey your perceived intellectual superiority over others, I suggest you stick to just the facts to hand. The populous of GTP was asked for their 10 favourite films, not some pompous diatribe about how clever you are because you think you understood a film most people wouldn't give houseroom to. The fact that you class it as one of your favourite films HAS been logged and will be included with the rest of the results when this thread closes in 30 days.
Wha are you on about?... I don't think I am in any way more intelligent than you or anyone else... I merely stated that there are different types of intelligence... I have always had a nack for interpretting art, yet, I can't do math to save my life. Some might have a nack for organization and problem solving, but are completely inept in social situations, and on and on, in many variations... I have the utmost faith in your ability to interpret these films, and I'm sure if you were to watch it a few more times, you would indeed start to unravel the story... For Christs sake, I already stated it took me 3 times through to get a good grasp of the basic timeline and plot structure. My experience with Lynch films, as well as other more abstract writer/directors, gave me some of the tools that made it a bit easier to at least begin to find clues the first time through. Understanding the director and their style, helps better interpret any film IMO... I am not talking down to anyone... I'm just really tired of people blindly puting something down, just because it was tough to follow, or they had trouble interpreting it...
BTW, since we're on the subject... What exactly was your reasoning behind your "killing a moderator" statement?... Since we're on the topic of pomposity... I have said nothing derogatory about anyones film choices, yet I have been the reciever of such...
Should you perhaps have said "It was only unintelligible to those who don't have a nack with interpreting art" if that's what you meant?
Yes, I should have said something along those lines... It was a bit of a stab, I agree... It's just amazing to me how many people can misinterpret a film and then badmouth it on those points... I was a little heated and lashed out unnecessarily... I apologise...
And I never said David Lynch was on drugs...if you had bothered to READ my post with your high intelligence level, you'd have picked up on the fact that I said if I wanted to get the same experience I get from watching a Lynch movie, all I have to do is drop acid.
You didn't huh?...
David Lynch is ****ed up. All he does is create visual representations of bad drug trips.
How exactly was I supposed to interpret this statement?... My point was, David Lynch, did not create a visual representation of a "bad drug trip"... That's what I'm getting at... If you must know... The majority of the film is in a dream state, and is complicated by the main characters obsession, and thus, psychosis... As I have said before.. It is very difficult to bring such realities to the big screen, and Lynch did a great job of doing so... Yes, that is my opinion, of which I am entitled... If I knew that I was going to get such flack over posting
Mulholland Dr. as one of my favorite movies, I would have refrained...
I just posted the film, and recieved all kinds of badmouthing of it soon thereafter...
Delphic, explain to me how a midget who talks backwards while a guy walks through several rooms lined with red velvet curtains and gets attacked (Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me) is considered a "simple story?" Blue Velvet is another doozy of a movie.
Do you understand the difference between "story" and "plot structure"?... Before anyone jumps down my throat again... I am not talking down to you, I am just asking a question that will better help me understand the best way to explain what you have asked... Once again... If anyone wants to discuss this further, please send me a PM... I have no wish to clutter this thread, and I have tried numerous times to take this converstation out of this thread and into a PM, but people keep replying instead of PMing...
This is the last time I will post in this thread regarding this subject (out of respect for Famine).. Anyone that wants to continue the discussion (discussion, not flamfest) please send me a PM instead of filling this thread with any more flaming...
So, would you like to insult anyone else, or have you finished now? Can we get back to the light-hearted thread at hand?
Yesterday 9:09 PM
I didn't insult anyone... I may have poorly worded a few small details, but my intention was never to belittle anyone... I have tried to get this thread back on topic, so with everyones help, I would love to do so...
Other honorable mentions...
Ronin (one of the best car chases ever filmed)
My Left Foot
´ll post my top 10 list when I get home, but I got curious about this one. I don´t think I know this movie, is it new? A link would be great, thanks.
No, it's not new... It was released in 1985...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088846/
It's an interesting film... Visually stunning...