On to JC's results!
Tak's 04' Honda Integra Type R (DC5)
Lap time: 3:07.996
Sector 2: 34.450, Sector 3:58.924
The 1st car I tested (mainly because i wanted it over with) is Tak's ITR. Holy crap, it's slower than a stock one, and hell's it should be. With that much rear downforce, and less hp than a stock one with an oil change (not even broken in just buy one, and oil change it). This is what Honda owners typically do in real life and it saddens me. Stick a wing on things, a fart can, use stiff as hell springs, and lower it (before any of you say I hate Hondas, I am a proud eg6 owner). This car understeers pretty badly for its setup. On cold tires you get this slight oversteer, and you think that's a sign of good things to come, but as soon as you drive it more and more it understeers more until the front tires are thoroughly heated, then the understeer backs off a bit. Man is this car slow. It's barely 5kg lighter than stock too, with a stock box. Man once you get into 4th, you just get angry at the car, when you need to use 5th, you slap yourself. Overall it's not bad and is not that hard to drive, but considering the stock one drives better and is faster, I have no choice but to give it a low score. Overall I recommend a softer rear to start with and less downforce.
Pro's:
-It's easy-ish to drive on warm tires
Con's:
-Understeer
-the rear is extremely firm
-extremely slow on straights(only car slower so far was taks t200 126hp Suzuki and the awd and way heavier T200 Celica by 2mph.)
-If you shift even a tad early, your lap is over, especially if done uphill.
Verdict: 85 (stock ITR gets a 91)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DigitalBaka's Volvo C30 R-Design '09
Time: 3:02.772
Sector 2: 33.241, Sector 3:58.341
On to the LOLvo! Man I love this thing. It's so fun to drive. Sure it has some understeer (anything with this much torque will), but boy is it fun. I was smiling the entire time. Just break early and shift up on downhills to avoid the understeer a bit.
Pros:
-AMAZING TRANS!
-Great suspension
Cons:
-TORQUE! (understeer)
Verdict 95/100.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rotary Junkie's Toyota 86 GT '12
Time: 3:00.785
Sector 2: 32.637, Sector 3: 57.916
This car loves to go fast. Too bad the L.S.D. says, "Screw Sonic, I don't like fast." It's still stupidly fast, but it has serious oversteer on exit. Many times I would be pumped up for a sector only to be slapped in the face by oversteer.
Pro's:
-Amazing trans
-suspension
Con's:
-Serious oversteer on exit.
Verdict: 98/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
fbccars924's Toyota Supra 3.0GT Turbo '88
Time: 3:04.876
Sector 2: 33.865 , Sector 3: 59.834
Is this a drift car(I actually drove it for a lap on comfort hards, and it wasn't bad)? Its a fun little car. It's kind of slow, but not bad.
Pro's:
-Very fun
Con's:
-It would make Jeremy clarkson very happy.
Verdict: 95/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AudiMan2011's BMW Z4 3.0i '03
Time:3:02.226
Sector 2: 33.569, Sector 3: 59.026
Great car. I had a ton of fun in it. Only problem is mild understeer on entry and slight oversteer on exit.
Pro's:
-Suspension
-trans
Con's:
-slight understeer on entry
-slight oversteer on exit.
Verdict: 99/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Korza's S2k
Time: 3:00.945
Sector 2: 32.842, Sector 3: 57.955
Quite a fun car. It's serious though. Only faults are very slight but controllable oversteer. It also feels a tad stiff.
Pro's:
-Almost everything
Con's:
-Slight oversteer on exit, though rare and controllable
-a bit stiff
Verdict: 99/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hei's Soccermom special.
Verdict: 1000/100, I mean look aliens, now look back, 0/0. Yup.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solidsnake7735's Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV GSR '96
Time: 3:02.799
Sector 2: 33.361, Sector 3: 58.366
This is quite the car. It is very well balanced, albeit a bit stiff. This car excels at this track. It handles its AYC quite nicely. I can't say much more about the legendary Evo IV. As long as you take it calmly, the car won't mess up on you. That's how well tuned, old 4wd's work in this game.
Pro's:
-Everything
Con's:
-A tad stiff
Verdict: 100/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DCybertron's Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX GSR '05
Time: 3:00.646
Sector 2: 32.965, Sector 3: 57.572
There are a few typo's in this tune btw. 4th gear should be 1.185, as all the contestant did is switch the top speed to 149. So watch out for that, or you'll be confused. It's a bloody fast car. Though, it does feel a tad rushed. The AYC is a bit high and causes slight oversteer on some tight downhill corners, and a tad of understeer on throttle uphill. Other than that, marvelous tune, just needs some tiny adjustments.
Pro's:
-Almost everything
Con's
-AYC is a tad high
Verdict: 99/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robrabbitman's Honda NSX Type-R 92
Time:2:58.629
Sector 2: 32.896 , Sector 3: 57.206
Holy crap this car was fun. It's horrible on cold tires, but once you get it going, it's so damn rewarding. I love this car, and if may I request, can I please have a copy sent to me. The slowest lap I ran was my 1st lap on cold tires which was a 3:01.223. Other than slight oversteer on exit when pushed, this car is perfect.
Pro's:
-Everything!
Con's:
-rare oversteer on exit (minor and doesn't bother car)
Verdict: 100/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
extreme car's Honda NSX Type R '92
Time: 2:59.336
Sector 2: 32.701,Sector 3:57.279
Man this car is quite fast but it oversteers waaaaayyyy tooooo muuuuuucchhh. Holy crap its a handful. I think it needs some accel work on the L.S.D.
Pro's:
-Great suspension
-Great trans
Con's:
-OVERSTEEEEER!
Verdict: 96/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
787bcgr's Honda NSX Type R '92
Time: 2:59.712
Sector 2: 32.721 ,Sector 3: 57.554
Fast car, great trans, slight oversteer. That sums it up lol. The L.S.D. seems a bit weak on exit if that's corrected, this car would get a 99 or maybe even a 100.
Pro's:
-Suspension
-Trans
Con's:
-Mild oversteer
Verdict: 97/100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZedMan1993's Acura NSX '91
Time: 3:00.566
Sector 2: 33.447, Sector 3: 58.873
Well this one feels a bit slow compared to the other 3. It's also very stiff. I get lots of understeer mid corner. It's a nice base tune. With care, this could be a top notch tune. Just needs to be adjusted.
Pro's:
-great rotation
-no oversteer like the other 3
Cons:
-Understeer
-acceleration is slow.
Verdict: 96/100
best I could do with this car was around 58.3xx seconds 👍. I knew the car had on oversteer problem but was fixed with my latest update... I set up the LSD too aggresive, but overall i was pleasantly surprised.
I may toss out some FRs and drive a few of these myself...just for my own learning.
Thanks guys for testing my car.
