GTS vs GT6 - Cars comparison
- Thread starter emula
- 1,346 comments
- 276,749 views
- 2,647
I’d like to see a comparison between GT6 cars in photomode and GT Sport cars in game!!
- 28,470
- Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- Johnnypenso
- 1,427
- Italy
I hope that's not true.... rebuilt from the ground models that are already perfect would be a huge waste of time and resources
Last edited:
- 2,150
- Jakarta
Not mine, but here early comparison of R32 Skyline on both games :
- 1,937
- Cotswolds, UK
- doc-shipman
The thing that these comparisons highlight the most (to me at least) is how much of a difference the lighting engine makes.
I'd put decent money to say that if you put one of the GT6 models in to GT Sport you would be hard pushed to spot the difference at a glance.
It's things like the light clusters and the wheels/ chrome parts that really stand out.
Yes, the level of detail on the new models is much higher, but the changes in the lighting model are just insane.
I'd put decent money to say that if you put one of the GT6 models in to GT Sport you would be hard pushed to spot the difference at a glance.
It's things like the light clusters and the wheels/ chrome parts that really stand out.
Yes, the level of detail on the new models is much higher, but the changes in the lighting model are just insane.
- 11,334
- The 51st state of america
- sparkytooth50001
It's really interesting to see how much PD has improved and developed their car model work over the last 11 years through that Skyline GT-R, one of the earliest models ever made for PS3 gran turismo. In comparison this brand new, better shaped mesh made just recently of the same car is a night and day difference. The gauge cluster used to be just a low quality texture haha
- 2,227
- Bács-Kiskun
The improvement is insane! 
- 1,548
- New Zealand
- MHFanatik
Yeah, I think we can agree that in their pursuit of perfection PD modellers have gone completely mad and insane, I mean just utterly ridiculous dedication to the craft.
- 485
- Croatia
Tessellation really is a game changer. Keep up the comparisons đź‘Ť
- 3,383
- Las Vegas
- dawko-san
- 1,748
- vspectra06
- vspectra06
It's pretty obvious they completely remodeled these cars and didn't just simply increase polygons to smoothen out edges and add more detail to previous models. The body panels' spacing, thickness, and even shape have been redone. Those differences are noticeable on some of the tessellated GT6 models too. I think some of the GT6 car models were more accurate than others so for those it's a bit more difficult to spot these types of differences compared to GTS.
Last edited:
- 1,548
- New Zealand
- MHFanatik
Patiently waiting for F40 and Countach comparisons
- 605
- Poland
- Emet_PL
For most of the cars it's true but some of them are actually copied with changed textures (for new shaders, and overall resolution) and a bit modified polygon mesh in some places. Audi quattro S1 is a perfect example of that. It even doesn't support tesselation.It's pretty obvious they completely remodeled these cars and didn't just simply increase polygons to smoothen out edges and add more detail to previous models. The body panels' spacing, thickness, and even shape have been redone. Those differences are noticeable on some of the tessellated GT6 models too. I think some of the GT6 car models were more accurate than others so for those it's a bit more difficult to spot these types of differences compared to GTS.
Gejabo
Premium
- 2,577
- Arnhem
- Gejabo
The F40 an Countach look nothing like each other. Apples and Oranges..
Sorry couldn't resist, I'll just leave now....
- 1,548
- New Zealand
- MHFanatik
- 3,383
- Las Vegas
- dawko-san
I can't believe how blind we all were when we saw some early eye-candy GT5 pictures. Everyone was like "it can't get any more realistic"
Now we can see how wrong we were
Merry Christmas anyway.
Now we can see how wrong we were
Merry Christmas anyway.
