Historic Sports Cars!

  • Thread starter kit_fisto
  • 54 comments
  • 10,360 views
I think that PD and Sony touched upon something in GT4 that, if done right, could add immeasurably to GT5: auto racing history.

Between World War 2 and 1991 there were five basic eras of sports car racing worldwide that produced some of the most iconic cars for auto enthusiasts in history.

The first era dated from 1953 to 1961 in which the World Sportscar Championship season had about six races a year for prototypes, serial sportscars, and GT cars in basically two classes: over and under 2.0 liters in engine displacement. This era produced cars like the Ferrari Testa Rossas, Aston Martin DBRs, Jaguar C-type and D-types, Maserati Tipo 60/61 "Birdcages," etc.

The second era spanned approximately 1962-65 when the FIA decided to concentrate on GT cars (although prototypes were still the featured class at famous races like Le Mans, Sebring 12 Hours, the Targa Florio, and 1000 km of Nurburgring). This era produced cars like the 289 FIA Cobra and Daytona coupe, lightweight Jaguar E-type, Corvette Grand Sport, Ferrari 250 GTO, etc.

Perhaps the most famous era in world sportscar racing (the third) occurred between 1966 and 1971 when we saw such cars as the Ford GT40, Ford Mk IV, Lola T70 Mk III, Ferrari 330 P3/P4 or 512 S/M and the legendary Porsche 917.

Many prototype sports cars were excluded in 1972 when a 3 liter limit was established. There was also a separate classification for GT cars (1968-75). In this fourth era of sports car racing (1972-77) many manufacturers lost their interest -- Ferrari (1973), Matra (1974), Porsche (1976), Renault (1976) and Alfa Romeo (1977) -- but each of them seemed to produce one of their most memorable and/or desirable sports prototypes just before they burned out. Cars like the Ferrari 312PB, Porsche 936, Renault Alpine, and Alfa-Romeo 33TT12, etc. -- but the championship died in 1978 as the European Sportscar Championship.

The last era (fifth) -- (1976-1991) -- leading to the current one lasted 10 years and belonged to the group C cars and IMSA GTP cars. This was the period of world sports car racing that appeals the most to today's enthusiast (IMO) with some of the most beautiful and quickest machines in the sport's history.

In each of the era's named, the design and development of sports cars evolved, rather than change radically from year to year. Thus, if PD were to take three or four of the most desirable cars from each era and do their physics, relatively simple bodywork modeling could yield dozens of model variations for each era. Not only that but some cars in each era featured engines from different manufacturers represented in GT4 so PD and Sony already have licensing agreements with these firms. Examples would be the same Listers powered by both Jaguar and Chevrolet and the Lola T70 Mk. III coupe powered by both Chevrolet and Aston Martin.

Instead of necessarily adding cars to the GT5 inventory, if 125 of the 730 cars in GT4 -- 25 cars from each era -- could be made "vintage" racers and substituted for some of the almost indistinguishable and seemingly endless variations on single Japanese model street cars, I think it would add a new and exciting dimension to GT5 and make it the preeminent console racing simulation game.

Since, in actuality, the "small bore" racers from each of the named sports car racing eras were usually based on production models and tended to be much more long-lived than their "big bore" cousins, only about 25 of the 125 vintage cars would well represent this segment of sports cars. Many of the base models already exist in GT4: for instance, the Fiat 500 was the basis for dozens of Abarth models, the AC Ace gave birth to the 289 Cobra (whose FIA model was the basis for the bodywork of the game's 427 Cobra S/C).

A few modified small-bore production cars -- Sunbeam Alpine/Tiger, Triumph TR-2,3,4, MGA and MGB, Austin Healey 100/4/S/M/6 and 3000 Mk. II & III, etc. -- provided the backbone of sports car racing for decades and could have both production and race versions in the game with very few changes. Add in a few of the small exotics -- Osca MT4, Porsche 500, RS, RSK, Alfa Romeo GTZ, etc. -- and GT5 could have its own lively and entertaining under 2-liter historic racing world.

The only other thing that would be needed to bring this concept to full realization would be the addition of three or four historic race tracks to the new game. GT4 already has the two "biggies:" Le Mans and Nurburgring. In the course of five eras the world's sports cars raced on numerous tracks but certain ones tended to remain on the schedule throughout most of their history: Spa, Sebring, and Monza. Other worthwhile additions might be Watkins Glen, Reims, and one of the Tourist Trophy sites.

Adding historic tracks like these would have the additional benefit that GT5 could center the national and one-marque races around popular national racing venues (and market segments). For example, the British GT5 fans would get to race British cars at Le Mans and a Tourist Trophy track (Dundrod, Goodwood, or Oulton Park); fans of American iron could race American cars at Laguna Seca, Infineon, Sebring and Watkins Glen); the French gamers have Le Mans and Reims; the Italians have history at Le Mans and Monza; the Germans get Le Mans and Nurburgring; and everyone -- but especially the Benelux fans -- get Spa-Franchorchamps.

Anyway, that's one direction I'd like to see GT5 go.
 
i like the 50's to 70's era as much as i like modern stuff

theres so much motorsport history that GT could touch on

ask yourself , when was the last time you got to drive a Bizarrinni in a racing game ?
 
Just wondering why you left out the Can Am cars?? I know there was a few of them in GT4 but a lot of the technology that series prodced was WAY ahead of its time.
 
vipergts662
Just wondering why you left out the Can Am cars?? I know there was a few of them in GT4 but a lot of the technology that series prodced was WAY ahead of its time.
I had no intention of leaving out the Can-Am cars -- one of my all-time favorite series -- but rather to include them in the 3rd and 4th era of sports car racing.

One nice thing is that many of the cars that participated in the Can-Am were variations of cars that were famous in endurance and sports car racing (e.g. Ferrari 330 P3/4, Ferrari 612/712P, Ferrari 512S/M, Ford Mk. IV --> Can-Am Ford G7A, Alfa Romeo T33/3, Matra MS630/650, and numerous models of Posche 908 and 917, including the famous Gulf 917Ks and Mark Donohue's all-conquerering 917/30 "turbo panzer").

Also, much as sports cars of the period did, Can-Am cars largely evolved around a common basis, so a relatively few physics models could represent the entire (first) Can-Am period.

Perhaps the ultimate example of both circumstances was the Lola T70. In the hands of John Surtees it won the first Can-Am Championship (1966) and it went on to compete (in Mk. II, III, and Mk. IIIB versions) in Can-Ams well into the 1970s. These cars were also powered by various Chevrolet and Ford engines, allowing for numerous manufacturer variations. Also, in coupe form, the Lola T70 Mk. IIIB was a significant presence in world sports car endurance racing of the period powered by both Chevrolet and Aston Martin engines (serving as the latter's "factory" entries). Essentially, PD could model the physics of the base Lola T70 and with minor bodywork modification (to roadster and coup forms) have close to a dozen possible different cars in the game.

The same holds true for the perennial Can-Am champions, McLaren. From a physics engine POV, perhaps two base models could serve to represent nearly every McLaren that ever raced in the Can-Am: the M1A/B/C-M6A/B (which would include the M12 and McL'Eagle) and the numerous M8 variations (which essentially includes the M20). McLarens also were powered by the engines of nearly every American manufacturer, so two basic models could provide the basis to fashion dozens of different Can-Am cars with only bodywork changes.

The game already has two cars from my favorite Can-Am manufacturer: Chaparral. The 2J is a joy but I think PD dropped the ball on the 2D (I'd much rather see the more exotic 2F coupe endurance racer). In any case, a Can-Am simulation in the game needs only the iconic 2E/G Can-Am car with a working wing (a la Mercedes SLR in the game) to have the McLaren's only real opposition (until the Porsche 917/20/30 arrived) represented.

Then, perhaps, three more cars -- e.g. AVS Shadow DN-4, L&M Lola T260, and the Autocoast Ti22 (or maybe Honker Mk. II or Caldwell D7 or McKee) -- and the game would have the Can-Am era pretty well covered, IMHO.
 
Hey, you should include saloon racers from those eras too. I love the early 60's cars like Mini Cooper Ss, Jaguar MK2s, Ford Galaxie 500s, Mustangs, Lotus Cortinas, Falcon Sprints, Alfa Giulias and BMW TiSAs to name but a few. Plus some of the 50's cars like Jag MK7s and stuff.
 
Mephistopheles
Hey, you should include saloon racers from those eras too. I love the early 60's cars like Mini Cooper Ss, Jaguar MK2s, Ford Galaxie 500s, Mustangs, Lotus Cortinas, Falcon Sprints, Alfa Giulias and BMW TiSAs to name but a few. Plus some of the 50's cars like Jag MK7s and stuff.
Good idea. :)

As an American, though, I guess I'm biased where saloon cars are concerned toward wanting cars from the famous "Pony Car Wars" period of the Trans-Am series circa 1969-70. I can't understand why PD and Sony included the big-engined American "muscle cars," which were more suited for drag racing (without a working drag strip in GT4) and Woodward Avenue profiling and/or NASCAR's high banks (in the case of the Superbird) while ignoring the "pony cars" that were specifically adapted to road racing on the types of tracks that proliferate in GT4?

I think five cars (both street and racing models) added to the new game could represent the excitement and drama of the entire Trans-Am period: the Boss 302 Mustang (69 or 70), the AAR Cuda (70), the Challenger T/A (70), either the Mark Donohue-edition or 1970 Javelin Trans-Am edition, and the 70 Firebird Trans-Am (which also came in a big-engine muscle car street edition). The Trans-Am Camaros are already numerous in GT4, so Chevy is in there, too (although once past the Penske/Donohue years they were mostly "also rans").
 
I was going to say that I had my own topic on vintage cars. This is a different matter because we're talking more along the lines of classic sports cars as well as vintage race cars. On the racing front, Can-Am is about as historic as any other series. You may even make a case for the 1960s F1 cars like in Grand Prix Legends. It doesn't mean they have to have licensed racers, just many of the cars. I can also make a case for some of the classic rally cars as well.

With all the classic cars available in past GT games, is it possible to combine the old school with the new school? What is the proper balance of classic cars and modern ones (threshold is no older than 10 years)? We could have a field day talking about this deal.
 
Don't forget the classics of the Ford Vs Chrysler Stock Car wars from '66-'70!

'66-67 Charger/Coronet VS '66-67 Fairlane 500

'68 Torino/Cyclone VS '68 Charger/Road Runner

'69-70 Torino Talladega/Cyclone Spoiler VS '69 Charger 500/Daytona/'70 Road Runner Superbird

After that, we entered the dark '70s, where cars balooned in size and shrunk in power.
 
JohnBM01
I was going to say that I had my own topic on vintage cars. This is a different matter because we're talking more along the lines of classic sports cars as well as vintage race cars. On the racing front, Can-Am is about as historic as any other series. You may even make a case for the 1960s F1 cars like in Grand Prix Legends. It doesn't mean they have to have licensed racers, just many of the cars. I can also make a case for some of the classic rally cars as well.

With all the classic cars available in past GT games, is it possible to combine the old school with the new school? What is the proper balance of classic cars and modern ones (threshold is no older than 10 years)? We could have a field day talking about this deal.
Personally I'd be delighted if a third of GT5 were focused on classic cars and races. PD is already doing it (in a lame fashion IMO) in the Japanese Hall with races for pre-70, 80s and 90s Japanese cars. And, of course, the European Hall has the 1000 km races for pre-1970 cars. I think they just need to expand that concept with the addition of a pre-1960s series of races and true classic cars instead of just cars (especially Japanese) that happen to be made before a certain date.

I mean, I really, REALLY don't get the attraction of owning 30 models of nearly indistinguishable Skylines when I could, for instance, own 30 distinct models of classic Ferrari racing car without much technical effort on PD's part. As I've noted, for decades racing cars evolved on the same basic platform. For two periods of about 20 years -- the front-engine era 50s to 60s and the rear-engine era of the late 60s to late 70's -- Ferraris, for instance, had the same basic mechanical underpinnings: 94.5-in wheelbase, same suspension (and presumeably handling), with mostly just different engines and bodywork (spyder and coupe). Enzo would take an almost identical car and fit it with a 4-, 6-, 8-, and 12-cylinder engines of various displacements for his top-line racers. Besides the engines (which are out of sight in the GT games), Ferrari distinguished them only with different model numbers and exotic bodywork. Thus, it seems to me that PD could make one physics model (like the Skyline) for the front-engined Ferraris of the 50s and 60s and then spend their time modeling different classic bodywork while simply adding horsepower to the physics equation. Then, instead of three slightly different Skylines, one could win or buy, say, a 1954 Ferrari 375, a 1956 Ferrari 290MM, and a 1958 Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa -- radically different looking cars with the same basic mechanics. Which would you all prefer?

Also, something that is missing from the contemporary automotive scene with all the consolidation in the auto industry are the literally dozens and dozens of different, interesting manufacturers from various nations that participated in international sports car racing over the years. I think people would be fascinated to drive and own the "best of the best" of earlier historic racing and street cars and rekindle an interest in the "Glory Days" and because of it, GT5.

Right now it seems to me that PD is just giving lip service to several of the nations in the game -- Australia, Belgium, Holland and Sweden come immediately to mind. Even, to an extent, the UK and France, given the breadth of their earlier motorsports involvement. All PD would have to do IMO to add some meaning to those countries' involvement in the game would be to add a track like Spa-Franchorchamps and/or Zandvoort (and maybe a Silverstone or Brands Hatch) and some of the historic racing and rally cars from those countries to race on them in "period" races.
 
I agree totally with all of this and hope they do it. I would especially like to see old rally cars. And who could complain about Mk2 Escorts and Lotus Sunbeams?
 
I don't have much to add to this really but I would love to see GT5 take this direction. I realize that this company is developed in Japan and it is always going to be very heavy saturated with Japanese cars but I just hope that they can add some more of the great cars from the past they have left out. I would much rather see them trim the number of cars and put in some great vintage racers of the past. I like the modern Japanese racers but we have enough skylines and evos. By cutting the number of them and adding some great cars like the Ferrari 250TR or the Lola T70 it could really add some depth to the game. I think a Trans Am series would be awsome also. If they could add enough to do some vintage race series that would be spectacular.

I still give GT4 a spin now and then but to me it lacks a real depth because there so many cars that were similar. I find myself just playing with the same old cars in the same old series. I think vintage racers and race series would realy help solve that problem.
 
Hey, you should include saloon racers from those eras too. I love the early 60's cars like Mini Cooper Ss, Jaguar MK2s, Ford Galaxie 500s, Mustangs, Lotus Cortinas, Falcon Sprints, Alfa Giulias and BMW TiSAs to name but a few. Plus some of the 50's cars like Jag MK7s and stuff.
I too was going to make a suggestion on saloon cars. NASCAR has never been popular here and drag racing is a kind of fringe motorsport. Sports cars are popular but expensive and Australia doesn't really have the sponsor base to support a top line sports car series especially with such a strong touring car series, so all that has been left is saloon or touring cars. All the cars you mentioned have raced here but we also have some of our own that would make a great addition to GT. We have Holden, Ford and FPV in GT4, hopefully that was an experiment for PD and now there might be bigger things to come. Holden, Ford and Chrysler (Valiant) all had factory saloon/touring car efforts with their performance versions or homologation specials. Some of these cars would have been a hit at any touring car series and they were allowed freedoms that Trans-Am cars weren't so they were quicker than they were. The question is how do you get PD interested in our ideas?
 
I'm not trying to suggest that PD has every Japanese car on the planet, but do you think there are some classic Japanese cars that PD may have not put into a GT game? My favorite Japanese classics are the Toyota 2000GT and the Datsun 240Z. I don't know too much about Japanese classics to be honest. I did enjoy that 240RS rally car, though. Outside of Japan, I'm actually curious about old Holdens and [Australian] Fords. I've been hearing about Holden Toranas and stuff, so I'm kind of curious about them in the next GT.

In Europe, I think a nicer selection of European automobiles. After all, the automobile was born in Europe, so why not some nice classics to prove that? A few nice examples can include the Bentleys which won Le Mans. Not just the 2003 model, but the ones which won the race five times within ten years. In the sense of racing teams represented in GT5, the ultimately weird deal would be if that six-wheeled Tyrell F1 car was in GT5. More GTP race cars would also amount to some incredible fun with classics. Maybe even a car like the Aston Martin AMR-1 can be featured. I don't think the AMR-1 had as much racing success as it could have had, but it was a car I remember from "Victory by Design: Aston Martin." I want to mention a few more variants of the Ford GT40. I'm confused as to consider it an American car, or a European car. Remember around 2002? Ford was going to name their lovely car the GT40, but the British had the naming rights to the GT40, so it was considered the Ford GT. I've seen this more as a British car from an American-based company. There were some other variatons of the GT40. My only problem is, should I label the different Le Mans-winning GT40s as American cars, or European?

I think it's a no-brainer that many of us Americans want to see a greater collection of American muscle cars. I've grown fond of 1957 and 1958 Corvettes as of late. I tell you, there are beautiful Corvettes. I've always considered Corvettes as "in-between" muscle cars. They have that American muscle to them, but they are also sports cars. Muscle car or sports car? We may never know. I also love my 1960s Shelby Mustangs. There is nothing like a 1960s Mustang. They have that mean stance and classic styling. They are unmatched in style and power. I would probably introduce AMC to GT5 as well. I can't think of too many names right now, so I'll leave it as that.
 
JohnBM01
I think it's a no-brainer that many of us Americans want to see a greater collection of American muscle cars. I've grown fond of 1957 and 1958 Corvettes as of late. I tell you, there are beautiful Corvettes. I've always considered Corvettes as "in-between" muscle cars. They have that American muscle to them, but they are also sports cars. Muscle car or sports car? We may never know. I also love my 1960s Shelby Mustangs. There is nothing like a 1960s Mustang. They have that mean stance and classic styling. They are unmatched in style and power. I would probably introduce AMC to GT5 as well. I can't think of too many names right now, so I'll leave it as that.

not only do i wish for there to be a greater collection of american muscle cars, which i want to know why they left out the famous 55/57 chevy belairs. they are displayed at car shows, raced on drags, raced on tracks and they didnt bother to put them in...

also, i wish that not only there be more cars but a reason to race them. like manufacturer races or classic car cups. ya know?
 
JohnBM01
I think it's a no-brainer that many of us Americans want to see a greater collection of American muscle cars. I've grown fond of 1957 and 1958 Corvettes as of late. I tell you, there are beautiful Corvettes. I've always considered Corvettes as "in-between" muscle cars. They have that American muscle to them, but they are also sports cars. Muscle car or sports car? We may never know. I also love my 1960s Shelby Mustangs. There is nothing like a 1960s Mustang. They have that mean stance and classic styling. They are unmatched in style and power. I would probably introduce AMC to GT5 as well. I can't think of too many names right now, so I'll leave it as that.

Ah the age old question of whether a Vette is a muscle or sports car. lol Either way I love them.

One thing I would like to see with the addition of more american muscle is more American like tuning methods. Lets say in the game you could only afford a Cuda with a 340 in it. Sure the car is fast and all but maybe your dream is to own a 440 or a hemi car so maybe there could be an engine swap option for that car. I know tuners in other countries do engine swaps with their cars but when I think of American muscle I think of how many of those cars have had swaps to get more ponies out of them. I would in general like to see a total revamping of the tuning part of this game but that's another post all together. I don't want to get too far off topic here.
 
Let it be known that I love Bel-Airs. Those are beautiful machines from the 1950s. I think my late brother's father owned a Bel-Air. They are certainly eye-catching machines.

By the way, the muscle car vs. sports car argument has been long-going about the Corvette? I don't want this to go off topic, but I'm just asking.
 
Bel Air? I dunno...In GT, a better car would be a Chevy 210 with the Hi-Po V8. It's got less bling, and would be lighter than a Bel Air. Same car, but less of the convienience items and chrome that aren't needed.

'57 Chevy 210 with a Fuelie. That's the hot setup.

The 'Vette...it's a sports car, in my opinion. A Musclecar is an Intermediate. like a Chevelle. the 'Vette isn't, and niether is the Camaro, that's a Ponycar.
 
Wait... a classic American car = bling? Since when did someone make THAT distinction on GTPlanet? You're an original, "Jim Prower!" I actually was wondering about maybe homemade race cars. I think during the Monterrey Historics event, I've heard of a number of homemade open top sportscar racers back then. I can't think of any cars right now, I'm afraid. I may look online to review these homemade race cars from the 1950s and such.
 
JohnBM01
Wait... a classic American car = bling? Since when did someone make THAT distinction on GTPlanet? You're an original, "Jim Prower!" I actually was wondering about maybe homemade race cars. I think during the Monterrey Historics event, I've heard of a number of homemade open top sportscar racers back then. I can't think of any cars right now, I'm afraid. I may look online to review these homemade race cars from the 1950s and such.

Most mid-to-late '50s cars had more chrome, by weight, than a set of "DUB" wheels. (Though I think them "DUmB" wheels, but that's off subject) The 210 had less chrome trim (especially the large side panels on the '57) on the exterior than the Bel Air, therefore weighed less. Also had fewer comfort and convenience options, which increased the weight differential. however, you could get it with the big engine...And go Racing.

Being a stock car fan educates you about '50s cars.

Those "Hot Rod" Sportscars are also a good idea. i'd like to hear more about those, since they beat the Ferrari and Porsche owners of California in their day
 
JohnBM01
Let it be known that I love Bel-Airs. Those are beautiful machines from the 1950s. I think my late brother's father owned a Bel-Air. They are certainly eye-catching machines.

By the way, the muscle car vs. sports car argument has been long-going about the Corvette? I don't want this to go off topic, but I'm just asking.

Yeah, basically since the 427 Vette the lines were blurred and the discussion began.
 
I've thought about this many times, ever since I won that little vintage Honda race car. I wish I could drive Richard Petty's Superbird so bad! I also wish I could see some cars there were even older than the 1950s, such as the blower Bentleys, and the "Silver Arrow" Audis and Benzes. (And let them be raced! I was so disappointed when I couldn't race my v-16 Audi Streamliner.)
Might be fun to throw in the #32 Marmon Wasp, too, though I can't tell how competitive it would be. If you don't know what that is, it's the car that won the first Indy 500 back in 1911.
 
Might be fun to throw in the #32 Marmon Wasp, too, though I can't tell how competitive it would be. If you don't know what that is, it's the car that won the first Indy 500 back in 1911.
I knew the name but I just couldn't remember why.
Outside of Japan, I'm actually curious about old Holdens and [Australian] Fords. I've been hearing about Holden Toranas and stuff, so I'm kind of curious about them in the next GT.
So does that mean you are curious as to whether or not they will be in GT5 or do you want some background info or history on Holden and Ford?
 
I'm actually just curious to know more about classic Australian cars, Schrodes. Just want to know what classic Australian cars would really put Australia on the map in GT5. A little background and history would be nice.
 
jeffxl04.jpg


jeffxl02.jpg


untill the early 90's the 1971 Valient Charger R/T 265 was the fastest Aussie made car over the 400m
 
Didn't that thing have a 6-cylinder Hemi?
It was indeed a six cylinder Hemi. It came with a 215, 245 or 265ci six. It is the 1972 E49 Charger that is regarded as Australia's quickest accelerating production car. It used a 302hp version of the 265 engine. There is some debate as to if it is still Australia's quickest production car. The HSV VS GTS-R was reported to be quicker with it's HRT (Holden Racing Team) Blueprinted 5 litre engine stroked to 5.7 litres but recent run-offs have the Charger still on top of the GTS-R. Some have got 13.8 second quarter miles on modern rubber from the E49. But the HSV GTS of 1999 is generally agreed to be quicker with it's Callaway built 5.7 litre V8 making 410hp.
http://www.valiant.org/ausval.html
 
i am obsessed with 60s and 70s cadillacs. when i first got gt4, i saw the cadillac brand and got very exited, only to find that the only car was a 2002 model.

there should be about 8 classic caddys in gt5
 
I normally couldn't care less about Cadillac, since I'm not a big fan of Cadillac. The best thing for American car representation would be the Trans-Am machines of the 1960s and maybe even the 1970s as well.
 

Latest Posts

Back