This whole argument is worthless. What street is quoting me on is innacurate and not correct.
The debate is not just mustang vs trans am. It's what street likes in a car vs. What I like in a car.
Street loves any car that has a lot of power. Fine.
I like mustangs. I tell him about the saleen display at the Woodward dream cruise, he says every saleen I have ever seen is fake ( just a modded mustang with a saleen bumper), says stangs suck, and that trans ams are better.
Street states this as fact grounding it on the fact that trans ams have more power than a stang.
I say: I don't care what you think. I like stangs.
He says: but stangs suck
Me: But I like stangs
Him:But they suck
Repeat for a few hours until it is time for some sleep, start again tommorrow with two different cars, mine less powerful, but I like it, his more powerful, making it better because of that.
. Street likes power in a car, because he seems to think he would like racing (did you hear he races? Think again. he's 15 years old, with no car, formerly owning a dodge neon before he could legally drive go figure), so he goes for a more powerful car, While I go with something that has a design that I like, yet still has a resonable amount of power
Is there a problem with liking a car for personal preferance on it's design and how it looks as well as power? Or is power the only almighty decider? Street constantly says you guys have an almost exactly the same view on what a car should be like (=more powerful than what I like
). I am sick of hearing this from street, and I want to know what you think, comming from YOU