I need to kill a debate

  • Thread starter Joey D
  • 101 comments
  • 1,911 views

Joey D

Premium
47,476
United States
Lakes of the North, MI
GTP_Joey
GTP Joey
My friend says the Mustang is way better than the Trans Am and Camaro. I think not. I think that the Trans Am and Camaro are way better then the Mustang. Can you guys please help.
 
The only stang that has any shot against ANY Trans-AM/Camaro is the Saleen S-351 but other than that stang the F-body cars whip the Horse.
 
During the 80s the Mustang had the edge but unless you bring in the recent Cobras Trans Ams and Camaros are better. The best is the Trans Am, since it looks better than Camaros. Mustangs, have to think about that, but 90-99% of Firebirds look better than Camaros.
 
I was in a chat room and some guy said a stock mustang could beat a stock trans am. I said dude you know nothing about cars.

He told me he did and that the mustang was better in every way and I shouldn't go by stats. Then he called me a dirty mexican for liking Trans Ams.

If anyone would like to mess with these two guys who know nothing there sn's are Spam2mapS and Claychampion. They reported me to AOL for something and I was told not to speak with them. So if anyone talks to them I would like it if you kept quite about me and the forum.
 
Look at the Bullitt Mustang, that is a mildly upgraded GT, does it have the hp of a Trans Am? I suppose he could have said something like a stock Civic can beat an F-body.
 
Well he thinks he knows everything about cars cause his dad works for ford.
 
Eismann1270: your wrong about stangs
Spam2mapS: about what?
Eismann1270: Trans Ams are better
Spam2mapS: whatever
Eismann1270: I asked a real car guy
Eismann1270: on my forums
Spam2mapS: stats don't matter buddy
Spam2mapS: real car guys like stangs better
Spam2mapS: not because they have better stats
Eismann1270: This guy is a car guy
Spam2mapS: whatever
Spam2mapS: I know lots of car guys
Eismann1270: What mustang do you think is better
Spam2mapS: gt, roush, saleen
Spam2mapS: cobra
Eismann1270: well you can't compare roush or saleen to a stock car dumb****
Spam2mapS: uh
Eismann1270: thats like a Civic and a NSX
Spam2mapS: yeah you can
Spam2mapS: why not?
Eismann1270: no you can't it one side dumb****
Spam2mapS: huh?
Eismann1270: Saleens aren't stock
Eismann1270: but thats the only way a stang can beat a Trans Am
Spam2mapS: saleens and roushes are stock customs, they come in one design, so you can, unlike independant customs, compare them to other cars
Spam2mapS: I have said MANY times
Spam2mapS: I don't base what I think about stangs off of stats
Spam2mapS: or macclarens would rule the world
Eismann1270: you should
Eismann1270: no they wouldn't
Eismann1270: there are better cars then McLerens
Spam2mapS: your system of judging cars by stats is rediculous
Spam2mapS: going by your way of thinking:
Spam2mapS: why would I get this viper
Eismann1270: I base it off car web sites
Spam2mapS: when I could get something more powerful?
Eismann1270: you really don't know anything. This is going in the forum for people to laugh at you
 
thats true but still come on a real car guy likes an engine not a car.
 
Originally posted by Dudebusta
ford blocks are easier to work on than GM's

HAVE YOU LOST YOUR MIND!!!

Have you ever worked on a Small Block chev? They are 900X easier to work on than the fords, more parts ect. Basically the engines are identical.

Note that we are compairing CIB engines not the DOHC bastards.
 
Actually, I lied. thinking of it, both engines are exactly as easy to work on as the other... Chevy engines have more and cheaper parts however.

Above based on summit racing's catalogue.
 
This whole argument is worthless. What street is quoting me on is innacurate and not correct.

The debate is not just mustang vs trans am. It's what street likes in a car vs. What I like in a car.

Street loves any car that has a lot of power. Fine.

I like mustangs. I tell him about the saleen display at the Woodward dream cruise, he says every saleen I have ever seen is fake ( just a modded mustang with a saleen bumper), says stangs suck, and that trans ams are better.

Street states this as fact grounding it on the fact that trans ams have more power than a stang.

I say: I don't care what you think. I like stangs.

He says: but stangs suck

Me: But I like stangs

Him:But they suck

Repeat for a few hours until it is time for some sleep, start again tommorrow with two different cars, mine less powerful, but I like it, his more powerful, making it better because of that. :rolleyes:. Street likes power in a car, because he seems to think he would like racing (did you hear he races? Think again. he's 15 years old, with no car, formerly owning a dodge neon before he could legally drive go figure), so he goes for a more powerful car, While I go with something that has a design that I like, yet still has a resonable amount of power

Is there a problem with liking a car for personal preferance on it's design and how it looks as well as power? Or is power the only almighty decider? Street constantly says you guys have an almost exactly the same view on what a car should be like (=more powerful than what I like :rolleyes: ). I am sick of hearing this from street, and I want to know what you think, comming from YOU
 
Ok what is the Trans Am :confused:

With being :uk: It's probably a car I know but with a different name in the :USA:?

Oh yea and Welcome to :gtplanet: SpammapS
 
I have nothing against the Mustang, and will not argue further, my only contention is that performance wise a Trans Am is superior to a Mustang GT.
 
Back