If You Could only Drive One Car for the Rest of Your Life, What Would it be?

  • Thread starter Sam48
  • 423 comments
  • 45,841 views
It can be any car in the world, but just one, so what would you drive?

I would personally take a Nissan GTR. It's made in Japan, so I'll be able to put light years on it without worrying about it breaking down. It's durable, and I could use it year round. But, most importantly, it's fast and cool.
We get snow here in PA, so all these supercars aren't an option, and I'm not foolish enough to pick a giant 4WD gas guzzler.

Subaru WRX STI, because it's a sports car that can drive in the snow, with proper seats and a trunk. (no hatchback for me)

I wouldn't be so sure Japanese means bulletproof, as car makers up top tend to head for the pits as they expand.

Of course if I could move somewhere without snow, it'd be this..
viper_black_dodge_viper_acr_11.JPG
 
I can think of two, V70R and Legacy GT.

Very much in the same vein, what about a BMW 5 Series Touring? The E60 generation was available in the US, and was available with a big V8, or alternatively, if four wheel drive is needed, then a V6 AWD version was offered.
 
ozyran
I can think of one that meshes up with nearly all, if not all, of those criteria:

Unfortunately, though, they're increasingly difficult to find.

That car is sex on wheels.
 
Very awesome! I'd hit that too, no matter if it doesn't look like that anymore.

I am glad the Chevelle is still around, but I really with that my dad didn't sell the '57 Ford that was in front of it. From what I have heard that car was a blast to drive. The 406 that was in it was built by one of Mickey Thompson's mechanics back in the mid '60's. It dynoed 575 at the flywheel. The car had the potential to be in the 11's with it's 114 MPH trap speed, but it never hooked real well with the street tires that were on it.
 
You didn't give an answer to the actual question.

What car can do most of the following:

Go competently around a track.
Take you up a snowy mountain.
Not embarrass you in front of adults.
Fit a ton of stuff.
Be comfortable in every day situations.
Not get vandalized by hipsters.
Run for a long time.
Appeal to more than car enthusiasts.
Appeal to car enthusiasts.
Whatever else a car can do.

You're saying there is not a car that can do more than one of those things?

'88 Nova Twin-Cam. ;3
 
Very much in the same vein, what about a BMW 5 Series Touring? The E60 generation was available in the US, and was available with a big V8, or alternatively, if four wheel drive is needed, then a V6 AWD version was offered.

Funny you mention the 5er touring as I was thinking along the same lines, though I'd be tempted to suggest the E39 Touring rather than the E60:

BMW-528i-touring--1997-2000-.jpg

Ideally, the 528i as it had rack and pinion steering as opposed to recirculating ball as in the 540i, and it still performs pretty well (I think Autocar timed the sedan at about 6.5 to 60, which seems pretty good to me) without drinking as much fuel.

Reliable, handles excellently, the Touring has loads of space, the ride is significantly better than the run-flat-tyred E60, it still looks classy even 15 years after release, the straight six is one of BMW's best ever engines, silent at low revs and sounds great at higher ones, and if you need AWD grip there was almost certainly a 528ix sold somewhere.

It's probably getting on for being one of those "best cars in the real world" you hear of. And of course if you need either a more relaxing drive or a more economical one, they did an auto and you could buy an excellent diesel in the 530d too.
 
Funny you mention the 5er touring as I was thinking along the same lines, though I'd be tempted to suggest the E39 Touring rather than the E60:

BMW-528i-touring--1997-2000-.jpg

Ideally, the 528i as it had rack and pinion steering as opposed to recirculating ball as in the 540i, and it still performs pretty well (I think Autocar timed the sedan at about 6.5 to 60, which seems pretty good to me) without drinking as much fuel.

Reliable, handles excellently, the Touring has loads of space, the ride is significantly better than the run-flat-tyred E60, it still looks classy even 15 years after release, the straight six is one of BMW's best ever engines, silent at low revs and sounds great at higher ones, and if you need AWD grip there was almost certainly a 528ix sold somewhere.

It's probably getting on for being one of those "best cars in the real world" you hear of. And of course if you need either a more relaxing drive or a more economical one, they did an auto and you could buy an excellent diesel in the 530d too.

See, I thought hard about the E39 before I picked the E60. By all means, I think the E39 still has fantastic classic good looks and is still a very respectable machine, but it was never offered in AWD. If AWD is not needed, I would say the E39 may be more ideal, but if AWD is needed, then only the E60 offered it. Everything else you said though was spot on. 👍
 
You're saying there is not a car that can do more than one of those things?
Actually, no, I'm not saying there's no car that can do two or more things of that list, I'm saying you're not going to find a car that can do everything everyone would want it to do.

In case you missed it, this was the point I initially adressed with that post:
It got me thinking though, is there a car that can appeal to everyone?
And I'm simply saying that there isn't a car that can fulfill all the needs people have at the same time. Someone wants a RWD drift car, someone else wants an AWD rally car, the next person wants to go at least 200mph, the next wants at least 30mpg, someone else wants to be able to haul their horse trailer or carry half a ton of firewood and in addition, there are some people that want a convertible and some that want a roof rack or something of that sort.

You can have a car that, like and Evo or Impreza, can offer a few things of what people might ask from a car. My point, though, is that it is basically impossible to find a car (or even come up with one that isn't an Autobot) that can answer all the needs of everyone - basically because there are quite a few contradictory things people will ask of their cars.

I actually thought people would get that idea without me explaining that train of thought in detail, but whatever.

Just in case, let me give you an example:
My father wants a large luxury sedan with lots of power to comfortably go on buisiness trips get and a good bit of speed out of it.
I want something that handles well and doubles as a track car and a daily driver.
My mom wants something to replace her Smart Car with: tiny, good fuel efficiency, cheap in terms of taxes and insurance.

Hats off to anyone who can find a car that can offer all of that, and that's just three people.
 
Last edited:
1970Chevelle4541.jpg


I've owned 2 Chevelles in the past and I can say, without question, that as long as I don't go mod-crazy I'd drive one of these until I'm dead. With the most basic upgrades to the suspension, it's actually a pretty smooth car. A Chevy engine can run for 150k miles with just basic upkeep and the driveline is stout...if not a little archaic. A/C units make a morgue feel like a sauna and the power steering is so over-assisted, you can go lock-to-lock in a parking lot while using only your pinky.

No emissions crap to fall apart, throw codes, or exceed the value of the vehicle. If you have the SS interior, the seats are actually quite comfy...not exactly supportive though.

Don't need more than 2 doors and there's plenty of room in the back for 3 of your friends or concubines.

It looked good and sounded good then...it'll do the same tomorrow.

Rust? I'd move back to San Diego.
 
This was a very Tough question. Do i go for looks? comfort? Reliability?

Well... I can only choose 1, but i will post more than 1 and then eliminate!

Looks
Kyoto-Gion2.jpg


It is a gorgeous car, i would HAVE to have a red one, i dont believe a ferrari is a ferrari without that signature red.

Comfort

Mercedes-S-Class-99.jpg

My friends dad works for Mercedes and they have an S class that i have ridden in and omg did i just melt into those seats.

Reliability
volvo-s80%20(1).jpg


Its a Volvo, with proper maintenance 500K+ on the odo is nothing. just breaking it in.


Final Choice
0806chp_05_z+1968_camaro_front.jpg


Now i did not choose one of the three for reliability comfort or looks.
I chose the 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. Its a gorgeous car, I would only change 2 things on this all original SS/RS, A new exaust, I like it louder and sounding much much meaner. I would change the stock radio because i love my tunes and the radio sucks sometimes, HOWEVER i would buy one of those old timey radios that has a new one built in (with speakers of course) and i guess a new suspension for comfort so 3 things, but i would get the stripe package probably a black metallic or black pearl. reguardless it would turn heads AND be awesome, with room for the family!
 
Luminis
Actually, no, I'm not saying there's no car that can do two or more things of that list, I'm saying you're not going to find a car that can do everything everyone would want it to do.

In case you missed it, this was the point I initially adressed with that post:

And I'm simply saying that there isn't a car that can fulfill all the needs people have at the same time. Someone wants a RWD drift car, someone else wants an AWD rally car, the next person wants to go at least 200mph, the next wants at least 30mpg, someone else wants to be able to haul their horse trailer or carry half a ton of firewood and in addition, there are some people that want a convertible and some that want a roof rack or something of that sort.

You can have a car that, like and Evo or Impreza, can offer a few things of what people might ask from a car. My point, though, is that it is basically impossible to find a car (or even come up with one that isn't an Autobot) that can answer all the needs of everyone - basically because there are quite a few contradictory things people will ask of their cars.

I actually thought people would get that idea without me explaining that train of thought in detail, but whatever.

Just in case, let me give you an example:
My father wants a large luxury sedan with lots of power to comfortably go on buisiness trips get and a good bit of speed out of it.
I want something that handles well and doubles as a track car and a daily driver.
My mom wants something to replace her Smart Car with: tiny, good fuel efficiency, cheap in terms of taxes and insurance.

Hats off to anyone who can find a car that can offer all of that, and that's just three people.

What car gets the closest? Of course there us no car that gets 35mpg, holds 6 adults, goes 200mph, has AWD, is at least averagely reliable, costs less than 30k etc.

But there are plenty of cars that can do 90% of those things and 75% of the others. The point is to find the most well rounded car, not be a pedantic, uncompromising stick in the mud because a race car can't hold a bag of groceries.

An Enzo can only go around a track, an S80 can only be comfortable, a top fuel dragster can only accelerate, a Smart car can only do economy, and we can go on forever. If you could only have one car but knew you would be performing many different tasks, including comfortably going on business trips, going to the track, and everything else, would you say "forget it, not possible?" Or would you find a car that can achieve most of what you want it to?

It got me thinking though, is there a car that can appeal to everyone?

This is a preface. This is not the question. This is the setup to the scenario. Everyone knows the answer to this is "no." That question is an introduction to the rest of the post.
 
Last edited:
Funny you mention the 5er touring as I was thinking along the same lines, though I'd be tempted to suggest the E39 Touring rather than the E60:

*wonders how many other people can look at their drive and see a car from this thread*

If I had to get rid of all of my cars except one, my heart would say I'd keep Red, my loins would say I'd keep (a finished) Marvin, but my head would say the Baron. And then I'd get a V8 one :D
 
But there are plenty of cars that can do 90% of those things and 75% of the others. The point is to find the most well rounded car, not be a pedantic, uncompromising stick in the mud because a race car can't hold a bag of groceries.
Wait a sec. This is from the opening post:
It can be any car in the world, but just one, so what would you drive?
Why is it up to you now to decide whether a car fits this thread or not? So no, that's not the point, that's your point. which is fine, but why force it onto others?

All I'm saying is, you can't find the definite answer because there's no car that can do everything perfectly, anyways, so it's kinda pointless to impose some sort of limit on this thread, isn't it?

Or would you find a car that can achieve most of what you want it to?
Do you know what irks me about this? You want to enforce some sort of "realism" in this thread, but if we're being actually realistic, it's utterly pointless in the first place. Give it another twenty years, and most of the cars posted in here will be basically impossible to keep running, anyways. Be it a BMW 5-series that won't be fixed because the prices for spare parts are through the roof or an STI that you can't afford to fill up with fuel anymore. Might as well be unrealistic in the first place, no?

Also, why does everyone else have to play by your rules? If all someone wants is a flashy, fast car, why argue with a Lambo?

This is a preface. This is not the question. This is the setup to the scenario. Everyone knows the answer to this is "no." That question is an introduction to the rest of the post.
And I specifically did that, answer that preface, obvious or not. So, I don't get why you'd challenge that statement.
 
There is two cars i really cant choose between.

4012454166_6e1a06b1d4_o.jpg

Orange please! :D Or light green.
Yes i know it aint the most practical car in the world. But i simply cant describe my love to this car. Loved it ever since Top Gear showed the first version of it the Zonda C12.

2007_porsche_911_turbo_1.jpg

The color dosent matter. My neighbour has one of thoose and it is parked in front of my house every single day. The 911 turbo is both pretty practical for a supercar and fast. It really just is the perfect supercar for everyday living.
 
1970Chevelle4541.jpg


I've owned 2 Chevelles in the past and I can say, without question, that as long as I don't go mod-crazy I'd drive one of these until I'm dead. With the most basic upgrades to the suspension, it's actually a pretty smooth car. A Chevy engine can run for 150k miles with just basic upkeep and the driveline is stout...if not a little archaic. A/C units make a morgue feel like a sauna and the power steering is so over-assisted, you can go lock-to-lock in a parking lot while using only your pinky.

No emissions crap to fall apart, throw codes, or exceed the value of the vehicle. If you have the SS interior, the seats are actually quite comfy...not exactly supportive though.

Don't need more than 2 doors and there's plenty of room in the back for 3 of your friends or concubines.

It looked good and sounded good then...it'll do the same tomorrow.

Rust? I'd move back to San Diego.

No such thin as an SS interior. Bucket seats ,and console, could be had with a Malibu, and lots of Super Sports came with a bench seat. I am also fairly certain that the round pod gauge dash could be ordered with at least the Malibu 400, if not with the plain Jane Malibu's. Only unique features are the center of the steering wheel on a Super Sport has SS, and most had SS door panel emblems. However, even the LS5 car out in the driveway came from the factory with Malibu door panel emblems.

Which flavor Chevelles did you have? I absolutely agree that these cars are hot when the weather is. Especially with a black interior. The vinyl top on the '71 doesn't help at all. :crazy:

*wonders how many other people can look at their drive and see a car from this thread*

If I had to get rid of all of my cars except one, my heart would say I'd keep Red, my loins would say I'd keep (a finished) Marvin, but my head would say the Baron. And then I'd get a V8 one :D

I can. The car may not look as good as it did in the first picture, but as far as mechanics go it's the same thing. Actually improved. It's got better springs/shocks all the way around, and the engine is making more power than a factory LS5 could drum up. Now if only it had it's original engine. One of these days.
 
I think If I could drive only one(!) car for the rest of my life it would have to be this:





It's got the looks, comfort, power, handling, pragmatism, emotion, and sheer presence that any good car should have. To me it's got the best all-round appeal of any car, ever. I've always admired the 550 ever since it came out when I was younger. To me it embodies everything I could ever want in a car.👍👍

Now, if only I could afford one!:scared:
 
My choice is easy. I've wanted this car since the very first time I saw one. Simply the sexiest American car ever made.
Z06History_1.jpg
 
No such thin as an SS interior. Bucket seats ,and console, could be had with a Malibu, and lots of Super Sports came with a bench seat. I am also fairly certain that the round pod gauge dash could be ordered with at least the Malibu 400, if not with the plain Jane Malibu's. Only unique features are the center of the steering wheel on a Super Sport has SS, and most had SS door panel emblems. However, even the LS5 car out in the driveway came from the factory with Malibu door panel emblems.

Which flavor Chevelles did you have? I absolutely agree that these cars are hot when the weather is. Especially with a black interior. The vinyl top on the '71 doesn't help at all. :crazy:



I can. The car may not look as good as it did in the first picture, but as far as mechanics go it's the same thing. Actually improved. It's got better springs/shocks all the way around, and the engine is making more power than a factory LS5 could drum up. Now if only it had it's original engine. One of these days.

It's my understanding that the bucket seats and console w/the afterburner style shifter was an "SS" option you could tick off at the dealer even for your lowly 307 powered Malibu. GM had all sorts of 'packages' back then as the car you ordered could be very ala carte.

I had a '72 that was cobbled together to make quite a street beast. My 2nd was a gorgeous '69 SS396 (402) in hugger orange. I still dream about that car while the '72 was over-modded and not really fun.
 

Latest Posts

Back