Chikane_GTR
Premium
- 8,146
- Heaven
To the OP please just stop
What if GT7 didn't even advertise that standards are in the game?
Then in game there could be a little menu called GT Classics, where the most popular semi-premium cars could be kept, pending a full premium version being added.
Kill the duplicate cars and any cars that have already have a premium version, but keep the ones that aren't fully premium (yet) in the classic section.
Add an Allow 'standards' check box to online settings and then nobody would have to see or use a standard car if they didn't like it.
That's an excellent (using twisted PD logic) way to get the standards into the game and boost the car content. I can easily see this happening and calling it a ground-breaking achievement in blending the "Gran Turismo classics fans have overwhelmingly told us they want to continue to enjoy", and the power of the PS4. 1000 car on PS4 here we come.What if GT7 didn't even advertise that standards are in the game?
Then in game there could be a little menu called GT Classics, where the most popular semi-premium cars could be kept, pending a full premium version being added.
Kill the duplicate cars and any cars that have already have a premium version, but keep the ones that aren't fully premium (yet) in the classic section.
Add an Allow 'standards' check box to online settings and then nobody would have to see or use a standard car if they didn't like it.
That's an excellent (using twisted PD logic) way to get the standards into the game and boost the car content. I can easily see this happening and calling it a ground-breaking achievement in blending the "Gran Turismo classics fans have overwhelmingly told us they want to continue to enjoy", and the power of the PS4. 1000 car on PS4 here we come.
Problem is this is PD. There is no way they would include hundreds of cars and then not include them in marketing.Using PD's logic we'll lose premiums for the next game. Think of how many cars have randomly disappeared from GT games over the years, especially in the jump from GT4 to 5 (which given the appaling quality of some of the cars thst made it is silly). And I'd be happy to know why the Ginetta G4 and Jensen Interceptor vanished between 5 and 6!
Like I said, if PD did not advertise the 'classic' models as being in the game it would be a bonus to the game rather than making up the numbers.
Think of it like a CoD game with old maps hidden in the game as bonus/ Easter egg levels.
I said this in another standard car thread and I will echo it here. I always though it would be better to just remove all the lower standard cars from the game and release it with a lower car quantity. That was until another racing game did something similar. They released the next version on the next gen console and ended up removing about 500 cars from the game from 700! Along with over half the tracks have been removed. All with the main focus to have better graphics.
While I have thought that would be a great idea, I think its terrible. So now the majority of the content has been removed from the previous game just to have better graphics. Huge disappointment. Its a tough situation for PD to be in. They either remove the majority of their cars to keep the best quality, by sacrificing quantity. Its really a lose lose situation for both developers.
I really like how GT6 handled the premium / standard situation. We still have all the cars and they can be brought everywhere. No the standards are not as good as the premiums but at least we can still drive them around and bring them to photo travel. Truly sit and think about how empty the game would feel with 800 cars removed from the game.
Op you can relax, if you took notice at GT6 car roster you would see that PD is actively removing duplicates. I was going through my garage of race cars and noticed that the '01 R8 #2 car is gone the silver/yellow car...totally gone.
Nobody wants to lose the cars themselves, it's the old models that have to go. That is the problem. I mean where would you draw the line? Would PS1 assets be ok in a PS4 game? SNES? There has to be a point where old, outdated assets are removed or preferably replaced and personally I think two generations of console is beyond that line. Have you seen what PS4 is capable of? You're ok with mixing that with low poly, rough upscaled PS2 assets?Last I checked the #2 was still available at the dealership.
I don't want to lose any car. If somebody don't like standards than don't use them. Where is the problem?. I still think that they need to add things not to removed them. If they droped some of the standard race car (Minolta, Pescarolo, V12 LMR, D2....) or any iconic standars (E-type, Giulia, 2002 turbo, R5....) would that make any good to the GT franchise? Higly doubt.
I have also been saying that for years. More developers and some outsourcing would indeed help a LOT. All the great responses are what we have been echoing for many years. I love KYs vision for GT, he just needs more people to help him complete that wonderful goal.What i don't understand is why PD doesn't hire MORE car developers? I mean they have like 200 employees (for everything) right now, but this game franchise has made over a billion $ in sales! Can't they hire (at least temporarily), another 300 emplyees and convert those damn standards to premiums once and for all ?
I'm wondering.. If upgrading 800 cars to premium is that hard and time consuming, how did they do it (create the 1200 cars) in the first place?? It was the best (graphics) possible then, just as premiums are now. I know more details means more time "drawing", but it is not only the hardware generating graphics that improve in time, but also the tools and software used to make the animations too, right??
Did they not anticipate this when they decided to make premiums?
I'm not sure you know entirely how game development works. You don't make something "more HD" (which makes no sense anyway) just by added new textures and it really isn't even as simple to do that as you make out.
What your comparison ignores is that Photo mode is not what the player will see. Sure, two tiny still images look pretty similar quality-wise (ignoring the terribad trees in the background of the GT shot), but in motion, the two games aren't even on the same level.
Please do yourself a favour and play both games before you compare the car models.But the car models themselves (my point) are not far off from each other and being lazy (PD's strong-suit) will still give an acceptable level of quality. They do however need to spend the time on the tracks and environments to get that up to scratch.
Please do yourself a favour and play both games before you compare the car models.
That's an excellent (using twisted PD logic) way to get the standards into the game and boost the car content. I can easily see this happening and calling it a ground-breaking achievement in blending the "Gran Turismo classics fans have overwhelmingly told us they want to continue to enjoy", and the power of the PS4. 1000 car on PS4 here we come.
Surely they will, they will just conveniently leave out the 'standard' part, like they did before GT5 release.Problem is this is PD. There is no way they would include hundreds of cars and then not include them in marketing.
That's already the case with GT6. They ditched STANDARDS from everywhere in hope people wouldn't notice. Only leaving small clues to those who already knew what to look for.What if GT7 didn't even advertise that standards are in the game?