- 759
- South Africa
- GTAS_PEETHAM
Great verse for eliminating critical thinking.
Nope. It's what happens when a document is translated from three languages into one and then retranslated 450 times by people with different agendas.When the bible speaks, the demons shatter and flee, and please, I'm not calling ANYONE demons here.
@Famine
That's exactly what happens when you make something so simple, so technical, and you actually do lean on your own understanding...
Nope. It's what happens when a document is translated from three languages into one and then retranslated 450 times by people with different agendas.
The link you gave exactly shows what the different agendas are. Your "preferred" translation is one promotes ignorance for better obeyance, the second promotes confession, the third suggests that God is your safety net and the last is probably the most sensible, promoting the acquisition of knowledge while retaining belief.
Which one did God mean? You'll say the first one, but other people who believe more-or-less exactly the same things as you will say one of the others.
Why? Because that's how you want to interpret it. Interpretation shouldn't be necessary with such a perfect being...
You'd think Indonesia or Malaysia would take up the chance of saving fellow Muslims stranded at sea.
Not to mention the immigrants just go straight to Australia. Which usually take the route outside Indonesian border.You'd think any country would take up the chance of saving fellow human beings stranded at sea.
Would be my personal view on it, and strictly speaking would be the one required under international law (the shipping laws over vessels in distress are very clear).
Huh, I don't get it. Why would any Muslim pass up on the opportunity to move to a perfect Islamic society, and instead take a longer way to a land of the unbelievers?Not to mention the immigrants just go straight to Australia. Which usually take the route outside Indonesian border.
There are quite rare instances where they get here. Several months before some Iranians caught up here.
Easy.Huh, I don't get it. Why would any Muslim pass up on the opportunity to move to a perfect Islamic society, and instead take a longer way to a land of the unbelievers?
So how come the same kind of freedom is enjoyed nowhere in the Islamic world? Why has the formerly strongly Christian West managed to secularize, while the Islamic world continues down the path of oppression, censorship and corruption? Several Muslim countries have a large supply of oil as well, so for those, lack of money to build a stable society isn't an excuse.Easy.
Australia has more economic power than South East Asian countries. Not to mention the "western" freedom and clean environment, I guess. So in their mind they will live in Australia happily ever after.
So they said
Which is a very different point and question to the one you first raised.So how come the same kind of freedom is enjoyed nowhere in the Islamic world? Why has the formerly strongly Christian West managed to secularize, while the Islamic world continues down the path of oppression, censorship and corruption? Several Muslim countries have a large supply of oil as well, so for those, lack of money to build a stable society isn't an excuse.
Actually, in here, its almost like in America. There are some hate groups to be expected. But majority is fine, no real oppression. In fact its the most tolerant muslim countries ive ever encountered. The reason why its more amplified is because in America, they have their own territory. In here, its just lumps together in one place.So how come the same kind of freedom is enjoyed nowhere in the Islamic world? Why has the formerly strongly Christian West managed to secularize, while the Islamic world continues down the path of oppression, censorship and corruption? Several Muslim countries have a large supply of oil as well, so for those, lack of money to build a stable society isn't an excuse.
You sure about that?Actually, in here, its almost like in America. There are some hate groups to be expected. But majority is fine, no real oppression. In fact its the most tolerant muslim countries ive ever encountered.
As they have done with Muslims from the 'wrong' bit of Islam.
Well, they have a problem with regonizing religion other than what has been stated in law. Which does have an effect when those minorities appeal to justice.As they have done with Muslims from the 'wrong' bit of Islam.
http://www.globalpost.com/article/6...-indonesia-worlds-most-populous-muslim-nation
It's wrong on both counts.
A list of 'approved' religions shouldn't exist in an society, people should be free to believe or not believe, as long as they don't impact on the rights of anyone else its got nothing to do with the state.Well, they have a problem with regonizing religion other than what has been stated in law. Which does have an effect when those minorities appeal to justice.
The problem is from the two articles above not only is it still being used, but its also being used against one religion that is on the approved list.Itll be considered to be revoked. But it wouldnt take in a short time sadly. Also note that only the "conservative fundamentalist" who actually bother with this thing. The more contemporary majority didnt even bother. Sadly those govs on some parties would like to listen to the former, which i noted as one of weaknesses.
Oh, they're just following the policies that western nations have put in place. You have argued that the West should not be obligated to take asylum seekers elsewhere - you may consider this a forerunner to the inevitable result of rejecting refugees: under-equipped nations refusing to take in refugees. Because if the West won't do it, why should they? Apparently you seem to think that they owe the refugees something because of a shared faith.You'd think Indonesia or Malaysia would take up the chance of saving fellow Muslims stranded at sea.
There's eight hundred asylum seekers abandoned off the coast of Indonesia who proves otherwise.I know you have a problem with your government's policy but it saves lives.
How does a wooden fishing boat carry enough food and fresh water to feed hundreds of people for 3 months. At even 1 litre/day for 500 people that's 45,000 litres or 45 metric tons of water.IN THE ANDAMAN SEA OFF THAILAND — A wooden fishing boat carrying several hundred desperate migrants from Myanmar was spotted adrift in the Andaman Sea between Thailand and Malaysia on Thursday, part of an exodus in which thousands of people have taken to the sea in recent weeks with no country willing to take them in.
Cries of “Please help us! I have no water!” rose from the boat as a vessel carrying journalists approached. “Please give me water!”
The green and red fishing boat, packed with men, women and children squatting on the deck with only plastic tarps to protect them from the sun, had been turned away by the Malaysian authorities on Wednesday, passengers said.
They said that they had been on the boat for three months and that the boat’s captain and crew abandoned them six days ago. Ten passengers died during the voyage, and their bodies were thrown overboard, the passengers said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/15/w...ya-bangladeshi-migrants-andaman-sea.html?_r=0
You'd think Indonesia or Malaysia would take up the chance of saving fellow Muslims stranded at sea.
No, it doesn't:I know you have a problem with your government's policy but it saves lives.
Blackburn
The council was shaken in 2004 when six Labour councillors quit the ruling group one month after an election and became independent representatives, and the council temporarily fell into no overall control.[2][3] The councillors, who eventually re-joined the party, left over an internal row reportedly sparked by the demotion of particular councillors in a post-election reshuffle.[2] Allegations of vote-rigging and corruption have dogged the council, with members of the Muslim community reportedly being "strong-armed by mosque leaders and councillors to vote Labour" during elections.[4] The possibility of corruption has been eased by reforms to postal voting which have made electoral fraud "childishly simple" in the UK according to a European watchdog.[5] The number of postal votes registered in Blackburn in 2005 was 20,000, compared to 7,600 in 2001.[4] In April 2005, local councillor Mohammed Hussain was jailed for three years for rigging the 2002 town hall election by stealing at least 230 postal vote ballots in his ward.[6]
It's all a matter of perspective. The allegation that people were "strong-armed by mosque leaders and councillors to vote Labour" could just as easily be interpreted as mosque leaders and councillors advocating for community members to vote for the party that they felt best represented their interests. So is it bullying or is it campaigning?I don't see anything especially Islam-related in this.
Either way, the Muslim community is marginalised, and Muslim influence in society is quashed, which is exactly what the author wants.
If it was a white guy who fixed it, wouldn't be issue. If its muslim it's time to start a bandwagon and get on it.
They don't unfortunately. 10 died on the voyage, although it's debatable how accurate "3 months" is as a timeline.How does a wooden fishing boat carry enough food and fresh water to feed hundreds of people for 3 months. At even 1 litre/day for 500 people that's 45,000 litres or 45 metric tons of water.
Huh, I don't get it. Why would any Muslim pass up on the opportunity to move to a perfect Islamic society, and instead take a longer way to a land of the unbelievers?
So how come the same kind of freedom is enjoyed nowhere in the Islamic world? Why has the formerly strongly Christian West managed to secularize, while the Islamic world continues down the path of oppression, censorship and corruption? Several Muslim countries have a large supply of oil as well, so for those, lack of money to build a stable society isn't an excuse.
Going to have to explain Pakistan and Bangladesh vs India and Sri Lanka for this theory to hold water.Generally speaking, I'd say the main problem of the islamic world is that it is a world composed of countries that for the most part emerged from colonialism only in the last sixty or so years. No post-colonial nation (bar few exceptions) fared well, regardless of predominant religion or ethnicity.
Generally speaking, I'd say the main problem of the islamic world is that it is a world composed of countries that for the most part emerged from colonialism only in the last sixty or so years. No post-colonial nation (bar few exceptions) fared well, regardless of predominant religion or ethnicity.
Going to have to explain Pakistan and Bangladesh vs India and Sri Lanka for this theory to hold water.