- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
The burqa is not a sign of fundamentalism.signs of fundamentalism like burka,
The burqa is not a sign of fundamentalism.signs of fundamentalism like burka,
On what do you base this assumption that every country on the planet would be better off without foreign aid? You don't think the very existence of Israel would be in jeopardy if America withdrew it's military aid?
So how do you propose we "stop" fundamentalism? Arrest people by their religious beliefs or ethnic backgrounds? That sounds a lot like what Canada and the US did during WWII against Japanese immigrants. Yeah, not a good idea.Got it, islamic fundamentalism isn't problem until they start cutting heads off or shooting people, it's also fine when they radicalize young muslims and government should totally not give a damn about it. Counting losses.
You stop fundamentalism by declaring its priests and prophets to be heretic, and anathema to King and State. And then putting their heads on spikes if necessary. The crowned royalty of Arabia should divest itself of the Wahhabs.So how do you propose we "stop" fundamentalism?
Got it, islamic fundamentalism isn't problem until they start cutting heads off or shooting people...
...it's also fine when they radicalize young muslims and government should totally not give a damn about it.
So far it was mostly action - reaction thing.
The police already presumably deploy more heavily in known problematic areas. Or maybe not since it's dangerous.
like racist or bigot
And who exactly is doing it, I thought we are talking about radical islam, encouraging fundamentalism is not a way forward. Or is it?
No, it's bleeding heart if someone jumps to conclusion immediately as someone mention a minorities.
again? ... bleeding heart
(btw. is this really abuse phrase in English language? I feel more abused by his assumptions ...)
I don't have any moral panic but I'm interested in those numbers, do you have a link?
I'm interested in those numbers, do you have a link?
I had to laught at this, i love the euros but their getting raped and this is how its going to be in every shop around if ya'll dont wake up... i like the british anglican looking woman with the fair skin hahahah
Remember religion like Islam dont follow race or nationality, so i dont consider myself 'bigoted" or whatever pro islamists would say.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/07/fashion/dolce-gabbana-muslim-hijab-abaya/index.html
I had to laught at this, i love the euros but their getting raped and this is how its going to be in every shop around if ya'll dont wake up... i like the british anglican looking woman with the fair skin hahahah
Remember religion like Islam dont follow race or nationality, so i dont consider myself 'bigoted" or whatever pro islamists would say.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/07/fashion/dolce-gabbana-muslim-hijab-abaya/index.html
Most bigots think that they are completely justified in their bigotry, and that as a result they are not bigots at all, so you're in good company there. You're not some blistering social critic who speaks a truth that everyone else is afraid to give voice to, however much you might want to be. No, you're just willing to take a dump on a key element of someone else's identity because it's inconvenient for you.i dont consider myself 'bigoted"
Which is probably the single most traumatic experience a person can live through.I had to laught at this, i love the euros but their getting raped
Charisma. It's a dangerous thing.
This is how you know the politicos have emptied their tanks, they trot out the Hitler comparisons.Wilders doesn't have charisma. Neither does Trump. They have populism, and Trump has more than Wilders.
Pictures like that are posted by people who are suffering from mental issues.
Neither one of the blondies are capable of what Hitler has done.
No, there is always room to receive and house true refugees. All that is missing, is the willingness to do so.You guys i didnt say i hate muslims, i said i dont feel comfortable living with millions of them from foreign lands to the point that islamic fashion is a new thing..... I support some sort of asylum for war refugees, but not amongst the population. 500 rape and violence incidents in cologne have proven that the extreme tolerance merkel shows is too much there needs to be protections for native born citizens of a country these muslims especially from the north african countries are squatters in my opinion, i have a right to have opinions too, it cant all be pro migrant rhetoric. And anyways, europe is teeny tiny, theres not room to house all of war torn populations imo.
One of them isnt a political clown.Local Dutch Socialist Party leader tweets: "Find the differences"
(the tweet has been removed)
There was no conclusion to jump to. You were pretty clear that you wish to specifically target Muslims and make it more difficult for them to immigrate.
It's not about them being a minority. I'd jump on anyone who suggested the same treatment for Christian immigrants as well. I'm not arguing against your proposals because they're part of the Muslim minority, I'm arguing against it because they're part of the human majority.
If you want to take offense then so be it ...
I don't. You can look them up for yourself, if you're interested.
I support some sort of asylum for war refugees, but not amongst the population.
And anyways, europe is teeny tiny, theres not room to house all of war torn populations imo.
Another thing I would like add about Islam, truth to be told but I think westernized Muslims(main the ones that see themselves as secular/liberal)...
...It seem to seem when it come to criticizing western policy in the Middle East its mainly limited to Palestine as oppose to the broader issue of western intervention in the region...
which doesn't to me as a surprise given the fact that westernized Muslims tend supportive of western policies in the greater Middle East and the repressive regimes, the end result is that groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS can control the narrative.
English speaking areas outside UK are more conservative, I dont always agree but on this issue we need to have some sort of detention centers, big ones that can house these families humanely but it makes the liberals in my country look bad to support full on integration, they could loose the election over it, and a h3ck of a lot is at stake here in the usa for 2016....anyhow we have problems here and Ted Cruz or some other bible belt thumper is just waiting in the wings, waitin to take over...We have that in Australia. It's called detention centres. It amounts to basically imprisoning refugees.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_immigration_detention_facilities
It doesn't work terribly well, if we're honest. It doesn't deter people from coming, and a lot of pretty bad stuff happens to people in detention.
Not entirely sure if you missed some sort of emoticon to display your sarcasm, or if you're actually serious.
That's wrong, I think, it's not only the West where you'll find moderate Muslims.
Again, I think that's wrong. Why would you think critics of "Western Policy" (Muslim or otherwise) limit themselves to Palestinian issues?
Some of that may be right but you're coming out of a couple of incorrect assumptions and ignoring a great swathe of history doing so.
Like no duh. The point I making is secularized/western thinking muslims are a big part of the problem and why? Because buy large they tend support repressive regimes, regimes that have been hostile to conservative Islamic groups like the Muslim Brotherhood.
Ask yourself this question, why don't you see many western Muslims(e.g. those living in the United States or Europe) let alone pundits criticizing the wider foreign policy of the west in the middle east?
There is a good reason...criticizing western policies would only brand them as Al Qaeda/ISIS sympathizers so the criticism is limited to Palestine alone. On top of that criticizing western foreign policy would essentially mean turning their backs on the regimes they support.
I know far, far, far more about the middle east and its politics then you might come to know.
Our government insists that detainees of the detention centres are treated humanely. The UN calls it torture. Everything about our detention centres is swept under the rug of national security. They are kept in offshore facilities, do not have adequate access to medical care or legal representation, and are often at the mercy of the locals. The government actively pursues a policy of trying to persuade them of returning to their homelands, and have consciously tried to make the process of getting into Australia so difficult and dangerous that asylum seekers will prefer to stay in war-torn regions at the mercy of the likes of ISIL than attempt the trip. When a (non-government) senator finally got access to one site, she was spied on and subject to a gross invasion of her privacy. Furthermore, the government criminalised the act of whistle-blowing, so if any worker tries to bring the appalling conditions to the public's attention, they face a fifteen-year prison sentence.I dont always agree but on this issue we need to have some sort of detention centers, big ones that can house these families humanely
Vague article. Was this a mosque that was found to have a stockpile of weapons? If these groups were really radical and calling for all that entails, I don't think I oppose the decision. Will any good come of it though if they only "shut down" the groups, but left the people? I don't think a "radical" idea goes away just because you don't officially recognize the group. They just take it that further under ground. If they were indeed "radical" that is.Banning Islamic associations and closing mosques is the latest fashion in Paris. 💡
http://news.yahoo.com/france-bans-three-radical-islamic-groups-following-november-000652197.html
Paris (AFP) - France has banned three Islamic associations which ran a mosque in a Paris area shut down following November's jihadist attacks, Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said Wednesday.
The mosque at Lagny-sur-Marne was closed in early December as part of a huge security crackdown after 130 people were killed in a coordinated series of shootings and suicide bombings in Paris on November 13.
Vague article. Was this a mosque that was found to have a stockpile of weapons? If these groups were really radical and calling for all that entails, I don't think I oppose the decision. Will any good come of it though if they only "shut down" the groups, but left the people? I don't think a "radical" idea goes away just because you don't officially recognize the group. They just take it that further under ground. If they were indeed "radical" that is.
Yes.Bill aiming to ban child marriages in Pakistan shot down as "anti-Islamic"
Another case of the famous No True Islam™ at work?