Got it, islamic fundamentalism isn't problem until they start cutting heads off or shooting people...
What exactly is the problem with fundamentalists who aren't committing crimes?
...it's also fine when they radicalize young muslims and government should totally not give a damn about it.
Over here, incitement to commit a crime is also a crime. I assume you have something similar.
So far it was mostly action - reaction thing.
How do you know this?
The police already presumably deploy more heavily in known problematic areas. Or maybe not since it's dangerous.
So why do they need to deploy even more heavily to known problematic
Muslim areas?
like racist or bigot
I didn't call you a racist or a bigot. Although the comparison was interesting; persecution because of race or gender is socially unacceptable in modern times, but persecution because of religion or culture is still apparently fine.
And who exactly is doing it, I thought we are talking about radical islam, encouraging fundamentalism is not a way forward. Or is it?
No, you just shifted the goalposts. You were talking about implementing measures that would affect
all Muslims, not just radicals or criminals.
No, it's bleeding heart if someone jumps to conclusion immediately as someone mention a minorities.
There was no conclusion to jump to. You were pretty clear that you wish to specifically target Muslims and make it more difficult for them to immigrate.
It's not about them being a minority. I'd jump on anyone who suggested the same treatment for Christian immigrants as well. I'm not arguing against your proposals because they're part of the Muslim minority, I'm arguing against it because they're part of the
human majority.
again? ... bleeding heart
(btw. is this really abuse phrase in English language? I feel more abused by his assumptions ...)
Yes, it's using almost exclusively in debate and argument to label someone who is perceived as being overly emotional about political issues.
If English isn't your first language then take a moment and look it up.
I suppose if English isn't your first language you wouldn't have noticed that I phrased my words carefully such that I didn't label you, I made observations about your apparent beliefs. If you want to take offense then so be it, but that's how you appear from what you've said.
If you don't want to appear to be that sort of person, perhaps consider if you might like to re-evaluate your views.
I don't have any moral panic but I'm interested in those numbers, do you have a link?
I don't. You can look them up for yourself, if you're interested.
I just find it interesting that you are comfortable with saying that there's a major problem in Europe that requires urgent attention by the introduction of some fairly major changes to immigration policy. But you don't actually know the scale of the numbers, whether this is a major problem, a minor one, or not a problem at all. You don't know what introducing these major changes would do, if anything. And this despite you having more intelligence than the official government agencies.
Where have you been getting your information from to form these opinions? The news? Are you Edward Snowden?
If you can't make a cogent argument, slap a nasty label on it.
I support some sort of asylum for war refugees, but not amongst the population. 500 rape and violence incidents in cologne have proven that the extreme tolerance merkel shows is too much there needs to be protections for native born citizens of a country these muslims especially from the north african countries are squatters in my opinion, i have a right to have opinions too, it cant all be pro migrant rhetoric. And anyways, europe is teeny tiny, theres not room to house all of war torn populations imo.
