I agree but, as you mentioned, the market is much bigger now. Also, technology is harmonized, transportation costs also went down, etc. I bought three games in 2013 (the biggest ones for the PS3) and I'm sure there are hundredths of thousands like me. At €60 for each copy, they made a lot of money. Only for GT6 did I get the impression that something is fundamentally wrong.One thing to factor in; game prices have only increased once in 30-40 years. Back in the 80's msrp was $50.
They went to 60 with the 360 and ps3.
Ironically PC prices have always been the same.
When I got into games 20 years ago a team over 10 people was big... Now? 100-200 is not that uncommon.
Then in the last decade used games allowed retailer to sell my game 5x times over... Further reducing the funds...
To help you with the math, on average a publisher makes around $32 per unit before cogs and manufacturing (it nets around 20). A retailer makes around $9-11 per unit... And sometimes covers shipping costs... And the retailer margin increase exponentially when reselling.
Yes, there is a lot of money in games, but it's harder to capitalize on.
So developers are doing more with less every year as salaries and inflation keep going up... Not just a few years, but the past 30+...
Edit: yes there are more gamers, but the average gamer age is 36 and getting older every year so the 90's were the hay day for developers.
Yes, but its a slight misnomer when you know the average gamer is over 30... So there is a bell curve in there.I agree but, as you mentioned, the market is much bigger now. Also, technology is harmonized, transportation costs also went down, etc. I bought three games in 2013 (the biggest ones for the PS3) and I'm sure there are hundredths of thousands like me. At €60 for each copy, they made a lot of money. Only for GT6 did I get the impression that something is fundamentally wrong.
Tried to find some data on game prices and stumbled upon this: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/06/are-the-ps4-and-xbox-one-really-that-expensive-historically/
Not directly related to games but still interesting nonetheless.
Yes, but its a slight misnomer when you know the average gamer is over 30... So there is a bell curve in there.
I'm not sure if that is public knowledge but it been the topic of many debates... "Why aren't we making more gamers? What's the tipping point? What's the point of saturation?"
All ending with more questions than answers. But there are answers... There aren't many old school guys around anymore, less that evolved with the industry and maintained the magic 'recipes', and far less listening as the industry grows... And that growth is taking from margins, not lining up with demand, leading to even less stability of jobs.
Teams grew because we wanted to do epic things, now those sizes are required to do standard things.
There is a diminishing return. The days of selling a million units for a hit is now a min requirement, not a goal.
It's that appreciation that keeps me talking... Nothing here can come back and bight me... At worst ill never make it as 'community member of the month'Am actually really enjoying your insight into this.
Well the RB events did say January 1st, and then it was changed to "some time in January" and then February came...I rememeber Kaz saying (or misunderstood saying) that he doesn't have a definite order to things when asked about DLC and updates before GT6's release. Maybe update 1.05 will mark when Kaz and his team finally get their 🤬 together and have a plan on how to run GT6.
Just a thought I've been having.
The red bull events were released on the 28 of jan..Well the RB events did say January 1st, and then it was changed to "some time in January" and then February came...
Oh c'mon Lawndart, the battle field strewn with bodies is a bit dramatic. I am one of those vets as well, we got our first pc in 75 and I think I started hearing about the death of gaming in 76 Here we are 30+ years later and it still isn't dead, cheer up
Hmm... Something was released I thought the first of February...The red bull events were released on the 28 of jan..
Hmm... Something was released I thought the first of February...
Anyways, what is to say we won't have to wait the same time we did for that update, other than the fact that Jordan said "in seven more days..."
I believe those dates set were from Kaz which were said before game release about monthly updates, and a little after. The Ronda and Feb update was announced at the botched round table discussion where an unlucky representative was sent to fill in and I think spewed out dates.But isn't that coming from the same people that announced the previous dates ?
But there are also millions on PS3's. I understand what you're saying but PD is a big structure that also enjoys a preferential treatment from Sony. This could have benefited the consumer but it's not and it's actually working against us.There is a diminishing return. The days of selling a million units for a hit is now a min requirement, not a goal.
I think we've mentioned before that those two mean nothing together....Because they're many hacks and glitches I could see the update got delayed (which its PD problem in the beginning, stating that's hacks wouldn't be found in gt6) guessing they'll try to fix them before the update.
Because they're many hacks and glitches I could see the update got delayed (which its PD problem in the beginning, stating that's hacks wouldn't be found in gt6) guessing they'll try to fix them before the update.
Wat hacks and glitches?I think we've mentioned before that those two mean nothing together....
No, coding and products are two different things..Wat hacks and glitches?
I suddenly have U2's 'I still haven't found what I'm looking for' in my head10 days and 57 pages later OP still hasnt had his question answered.
Better AI, standing starts and endurance racing, etc was never promised. However, better online features, VGT cars, Zahara track, track creator etc were promised and heavily influenced many buyers.Why is everyone getting their hopes up for the update anyways? It's not going to bring better AI, standing starts, endurance races, easy comprehendable online lobbies and other basic racing features that this game needs. Instead, it's going to bring out a car, fix a few freezes and maybe a new track. Where's the saviour in that?
Oh trueNo, coding and products are two different things..
However, bugs and glitches deserve first priority IMO
Better AI, standing starts and endurance racing, etc was never promised. However, better online features, VGT cars, Zahara track, track creator etc were promised and heavily influenced many buyers.
Not a peep from the Gran Turismo Facebook page, figured as much, but I'll keep bugging them, tagging them directly so they must be seeing the comments/posts.
Still, I have little hope for this "7 days" nonsense. Jan 1st turned into "January", and February turned into "........" (silence), 7 days could just become "update yet to be determined"
I'd love to see PD prove me wrong with a fully-functional Zahara next Friday, but I only see 7 days as borrowed-time for PD.
Disk space? That's a joke, right?New cars, tracks, play modes (B-Spec) or other standalone programs (Course Creator) will in no way affect the load upon the processor or RAM of the PS3... Disk space, maybe, but that's nowhere as limited on most people's system to be much of a concern.
Updates are more data installed on your hard drive that needs accessed while playing the game. Loading more data is always an increase in burden.That makes no sense whatsoever, how will updates burden it further. I thought updates usually help the game, that's why we all look foreword to them.