Jaguar Reveals Rebrand for its EV Future (šŸ˜¬)

  • Thread starter Famine
  • 130 comments
  • 6,665 views
I love that this is triggering the brown-shirts... when was the last time the Daily Heil ran an article about a straight white dude behind a marketing campaign?
 
Relevance?
The new brand advert video. Take a look, its quite dramatic. There has been lots of talk about why Jaguar would do such a horrendous thing as that. Its this Jaguar director.
92310055-14106133-image-a-4_1732149354590.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty certain they are trolling with new their advert - not the most original idea, but I presume they just wanted it to go 'viral'. Meanwhile, they've posted a teaser of the new car...


You say that like the ā€œtrollingā€ has stopped with that teaser image. No, they are still committed to alienating everyone.
 
oh.
so it's not bad because it's jumping on the generic Apple clone design ethos a decade after companies started getting made fun of for doing it (again, it's been so long that companies have already started switching back)
it's not bad because it's stupidly formatted in a way that draws direct attention to the fact that it is just the current Google logo
it's not bad because the accompanying ad is art student wankery that does nothing for the brand




it's bad because of WOKE.
Other than people with varying skin colours prancing around in tacky, retro-neon outfits, Iā€™m not sure what exactly was woke about a bad fashion show.

Been seeing a lot of that vocabulary in the Jaguar discussion lately. But hey being overtly racist on social media is cool now, so not surprising.
 
Last edited:
Forbes has an article on the advert and has quoted some experts about it.

ā€œFrom a branding perspective, the rebrand feels like a misstep. The video, featuring androgynous models in gender-neutral or gender-bending attire, risks alienating traditional customers in a climate where numerous brands have recently faced backlash for their perceived political stances,ā€ Bruno Benedini, founder of Taillight Branding, observed via email.


ā€œMore importantly, the campaign appears disconnected from the very traits Jaguar spent decades building. Gone are the understated elegance, performance nods, and any clear connection to British heritageā€¦For a car company to launch a rebrand video without a single reference to its carsā€”its core productā€”is simply mind-boggling,ā€ he pointed out.


Rebranding efforts should not stray from what people believe or are comfortable with.


ā€œThe ad was bold and seems to be, at first glance, parallel to what failed Anheuser Busch and the marketing of its Bud Light line, in that the ad is far removed from what the majority of its consumer base likely believes. Culturally, [it is] dangerous to operate on the fringes of socially accepted norms,ā€ Michael Toebe, a trust, risk management, communications and reputation specialist at Reputation Intelligence - Reputation Quality, warned via email.

Forbes article
 
The new brand advert video. Take a look, its quite dramatic. There has been lots of talk about why Jaguar would do such a horrendous thing as that. Its this Jaguar director.
You... do know that's a (hilariously vulgar) musical created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone of South Park/Team America, right?
 
The new brand advert video. Take a look, its quite dramatic. There has been lots of talk about why Jaguar would do such a horrendous thing as that. Its this Jaguar director.
92310055-14106133-image-a-4_1732149354590.jpg
Buddyā€¦ people are trying to point out to you that this guy being queer has nothing to do with your distaste for the company's new design direction. It is an embarrassing opinion to voice, hence why people are laughing at you.
 
Buddyā€¦ people are trying to point out to you that this guy being queer has nothing to do with your distaste for the company's new design direction. It is an embarrassing opinion to voice, hence why people are laughing at you.
I think you have only shone a light into your own feelings.
You realise the Q word is defined as offensive in English language and should only be used to describe oneself.
My view is to do with him being visually camp style not homosexual. This is why I think the taste is ridiculous, just look at him.
Off the top of my head I can name three homosexual celebrities Sir Ian McKellen, Stephen Fry and Graham Norton. I appreciate two the other is horribly camp.


You... do know that's a (hilariously vulgar) musical created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone of South Park/Team America, right?
I thought it looked a bit much. No, I had no idea. Just adding the Daily Mail's extra "image". Good old Daily Mail.
 
Last edited:
You realise the Q word is defined as offensive in English language and should only be used to describe oneself.
You might want to check into the meaning of LGBTQIA+...
Weird segue from a car company rebrand, but there we go I guess.
Can we get back to the topic now, and off this weird vibe of "obviously it was bad, a gay did it"?

Edit: No, that's not one of those optional requests.

Edit: No, that's not one of those optional requests.
 
Last edited:
Back