- 286
- Newcastle
- sheephead99
its a strong Favorite for my 490pp entry
its a strong Favorite for my 490pp entry
Had a run on Tsukuba with some parts tuning in my weapon of choice. I have some looooong nights ahead of me. The understeer is....well if I get on too early I'll shoot off the track and end up at Fuji.....
Nissan sileighty
I will be adding myself to the 550 list i will have lots of time to test since spring break will be happening during the testing.
I believe for this shootout he's asked the testers add the tuners.520
3) Hermanvongerman- PSN: Jontank5
4) Snake55wildcat- PSN: Snake55wildcat
5) VTiRoj- PSN: RoJJieE
6) CSLACR- PSN: CSLACR
7) Theo777- PSN: zigatan
11) Motor City Hami- PSN:MotorCtyHamilton
12) SolidSnake7735- PSN: SolidSnake7735
13) sheephead99- PSN: sheephead99
I also need these people to send me FRs if they want they tune tested
I'm not sure the RX-7 can win any of the PP classes, but for a trifecta car, it's probably the absolute best I'm guessing.PraianoI will add myself for 490PP , i`m not sure of the superiority of the RX7
I'm not sure the RX-7 can win any of the PP classes, but for a trifecta car, it's probably the absolute best I'm guessing.
Plus it'll be neat to tune the same car 3 times, or maybe try for a "1 tune to rule them all", meaning same tune for all three, minus power adders, ect for lower PP.
DigitalBakaThat's what I was going to try. I have a hard enough time getting one done. Still need to figure out the logistics of removables...probably need to have just engine tuning for my low level. Should be fun to figure out though.
I believe for this shootout he's asked the testers add the tuners.
Ok, Ryan, I think I can do the 520PP as well, as my 490PP tune can handle a bit more grip and go, though it is naturally more loose and lairy. So I'm in the All-in-1 bandwagon too.
ok Onboy updated it, just to make sure you are still just doing 490 and 520 right?
Allrighty then, here are my testing results thus far.
TUNERraino63
MAKE&MODEL:Nissan Skyline GT-R M-Spec Nur(R34) '02
CIRCUIT:Tsukuba TIME:0:59.633
CIRCUIT:Suzuka TIME:2:17.721(2:16.863)
When I first tested this tune I admittedly didn't do my do dilligence of carefully reading the posted tune, and did not reset the final drive as specified. Thus, the time in parenthesis is the time I ran with the gear set for Tsukuba.
As for general impressions of the car, I found understeer to be somewhat of an issue. It can be managed with precise throttle control but that is not my strong suit. I also found the tail end quite loose, which offset the understeer sometimes but frankly not enough for me. Also, it was my experience that the bumper strips at tracks edge were not my friend in this car. That being said, I have to admit that I am biased against 4WD cars in general for the reasons I stated above.
If i understand you have run a faster time at Suzuka with the Tsukuba gear box??? You can´t reach the max speed at suzuka with this setting , something wrong or i don´t understand everything. What are your times??? Finally?
CIRCUIT:Tsukuba TIME:0:59.633 with suzuka gearbox??
Like I said in the post, my first round of testing your car I failed to reset the final drive for Suzuka, so the (2:16.863) was achieved with the 3.385 final drive setting. The 2:17.721 time was achieved with the 3.030 final drive that you stipulated in your posted tune. The best explanation I have for the gap in the times is that with the numerically higher final drive ratio I was able to make up time lost to understeer better than I was with the intended final drive ratio. Yes my top speed was lower in the faster run but I think the two times speak for themselves.
I chose to post both times because I thought this was a discussion worth having. Also, I did not run a second round at Tsukuba with the Suzuka gearing because I didn't think it would provide any positive differences in lap time.
The Tacoma has almost killed one tester, wonder who will be next?,
back to tuning and test driving my 490pp and 550 pp rides.........
Boy oh boy that Tacoma is a handful