JalopnikJalopnikHere's the base price list, as spotted on JeepRenegadeForum:
That doesn't include dealer fees, destination charges, or options of course. Here are the powertrain options in each trim to help you sort out what you're getting:
- Sport: $17,995
- Latitude: $21,295
- Limited: $24,795
- Trailhawk: $25,995
- 4x4 adds $2,000
Renegade Sport and Latitude
Renegade Limited (Optional on Sport and Latitude)
- 1.4-liter MultiAir Turbo engine with 6-speed manual (9-speed auto available with packages)
- 4x2 or 4x4 (Jeep Active Drive)
Renegade Trailhawk
- 2.4-liter Tigershark engine with 9-speed automatic
- 4x2 or 4x4 (Jeep Active Drive)
- 2.4-liter Tigershark engine with 9-speed automatic
- Jeep Active Drive Low with 20:1 crawl ratio and unique five mode Jeep Selec-Terrain™ systemAnd here's the powertrain
I thought the Renegade was based on Fiat's 500X rather than the Panda 4x4? It's certainly a hell of a lot bigger than a Panda 4x4 in the metal.This car is cool, plus the Panda 4x4 Platform
The 500 and the Panda are on the same platform, it's likely stretched alittle so it's Sub-compact size.I thought the Renegade was based on Fiat's 500X rather than the Panda 4x4? It's certainly a hell of a lot bigger than a Panda 4x4 in the metal.
The 500 and Panda are on the same platform.The 500 and the Panda are on the same platform, it's likely stretched alittle so it's Sub-compact size.
Im suprised they used that old commercial though.It's clear from the commercial: 500x = giant cock.
The Jeep is better in every way.
They'll be perfectly fine for the 2.4. The turbo engine will have all sorts of problems because turbo engines just naturally have all sorts of problems.Built in Italy? Well, that certainly explains the $995 destination fee. How bad are we guessing the reliability ratings will be in the first couple of years?
Its still cheaper than the Chevy Trax.....
They'll be perfectly fine for the 2.4. The turbo engine will have all sorts of problems because turbo engines just naturally have all sorts of problems.
In that case, I don't know what to tell you. If in 2015 they can't make a naturally aspirated engine that lasts 250k miles without blinking then maybe they should just give up.Well, the Cars.com Cherokee with the same powertrain blew an engine at 13,300 miles. Sounds like it isn't a super-common issue, but, that the 2.4L units are having more issues than they should. If it isn't the engine, its the transmission, as well. Although they just rolled out another update today, they had been replacing as many as 12-15 transmissions a week. Not exactly sky-high numbers, but certainly a bit more than what should be gone through.
And that's the damn thing... The engine has been around for years, and its been quite reliable - well, the old ones, and the modified versions that were shared between Chrysler, Mitsubishi, and Hyundai. What the hell did they do to make the Tigershark that bad?
In that case, I don't know what to tell you. If in 2015 they can't make a naturally aspirated engine that lasts 250k miles without blinking then maybe they should just give up.